- Boost-users - lists.boost.org

[Interprocess Test]Boost Interprocess tests failed to compile on solaris 9
by d s 30 Jul '09

30 Jul '09

Hi, The interprocess test compilation fails on solaris 9. Error is thrown for solaris atomic operations. Following the command used and log - ./bjam ./libs/interprocess/test/ ...patience... ...patience... ...found 1953 targets... ...updating 473 targets... common.mkdir bin.v2/libs/interprocess common.mkdir bin.v2/libs/interprocess/test common.mkdir bin.v2/libs/interprocess/test/intersegment_ptr_test.test common.mkdir bin.v2/libs/interprocess/test/intersegment_ptr_test.test/gcc-3.4.2 common.mkdir bin.v2/libs/interprocess/test/intersegment_ptr_test.test/gcc-3.4.2/debug common.mkdir bin.v2/libs/interprocess/test/intersegment_ptr_test.test/gcc-3.4.2/debug/threading-multi gcc.compile.c++ bin.v2/libs/interprocess/test/intersegment_ptr_test.test/gcc-3.4.2/debug/threading-multi/intersegment_ptr_test.o In file included from ./boost/interprocess/detail/managed_open_or_create_impl.hpp:20, from ./boost/interprocess/detail/managed_multi_shared_memory.hpp:30, from libs/interprocess/test/intersegment_ptr_test.cpp:17: ./boost/interprocess/detail/atomic.hpp: In function `boost::uint32_t boost::interprocess::detail::atomic_add32(volatile boost::uint32_t*, boost::uint32_t)': ./boost/interprocess/detail/atomic.hpp:331: error: invalid conversion from `volatile uint32_t*' to `uint32_t*' ./boost/interprocess/detail/atomic.hpp:331: error: initializing argument 1 of `uint32_t atomic_add_32_nv(uint32_t*, int32_t)' ./boost/interprocess/detail/atomic.hpp: In function `boost::uint32_t boost::interprocess::detail::atomic_cas32(volatile boost::uint32_t*, boost::uint32_t, boost::uint32_t)': ./boost/interprocess/detail/atomic.hpp:341: error: `atomic_cas_32' undeclared (first use this function) ./boost/interprocess/detail/atomic.hpp:341: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in.) ./boost/interprocess/detail/atomic.hpp: In function `boost::uint32_t boost::interprocess::detail::atomic_inc32(volatile boost::uint32_t*)': ./boost/interprocess/detail/atomic.hpp:347: error: invalid conversion from `volatile uint32_t*' to `uint32_t*' ./boost/interprocess/detail/atomic.hpp:347: error: initializing argument 1 of `uint32_t atomic_add_32_nv(uint32_t*, int32_t)' ./boost/interprocess/detail/atomic.hpp: In function `boost::uint32_t boost::interprocess::detail::atomic_dec32(volatile boost::uint32_t*)': ./boost/interprocess/detail/atomic.hpp:353: error: invalid conversion from `volatile uint32_t*' to `uint32_t*' ./boost/interprocess/detail/atomic.hpp:353: error: initializing argument 1 of `uint32_t atomic_add_32_nv(uint32_t*, int32_t)' "g++" -ftemplate-depth-128 -O0 -fno-inline -Wall -g -pthreads -fPIC -DBOOST_ALL_NO_LIB=1 -DBOOST_THREAD_POSIX -DBOOST_THREAD_USE_DLL=1 -I"." -c -o "bin.v2/libs/interprocess/test/intersegment_ptr_test.test/gcc-3.4.2/debug/threading-multi/intersegment_ptr_test.o" "libs/interprocess/test/intersegment_ptr_test.cpp" ...failed gcc.compile.c++ bin.v2/libs/interprocess/test/intersegment_ptr_test.test/gcc-3.4.2/debug/threading-multi/intersegment_ptr_test.o... common.mkdir bin.v2/libs/thread/build/gcc-3.4.2/debug common.mkdir bin.v2/libs/thread/build/gcc-3.4.2/debug/threading-multi common.mkdir bin.v2/libs/thread/build/gcc-3.4.2/debug/threading-multi/pthread gcc.compile.c++ bin.v2/libs/thread/build/gcc-3.4.2/debug/threading-multi/pthread/thread.o gcc.compile.c++ bin.v2/libs/thread/build/gcc-3.4.2/debug/threading-multi/pthread/exceptions.o gcc.compile.c++ bin.v2/libs/thread/build/gcc-3.4.2/debug/threading-multi/pthread/once.o gcc.link.dll bin.v2/libs/thread/build/gcc-3.4.2/debug/threading-multi/libboost_thread-gcc34-mt-d-1_39.so.1.39.0 ...skipped <pbin.v2/libs/interprocess/test/intersegment_ptr_test.test/gcc-3.4.2/debug/threading-multi>intersegment_ptr_test for lack of <pbin.v2/libs/interprocess/test/intersegment_ptr_test.test/gcc-3.4.2/debug/threading-multi>intersegment_ptr_test.o... ...skipped <pbin.v2/libs/interprocess/test/intersegment_ptr_test.test/gcc-3.4.2/debug/threading-multi>intersegment_ptr_test.run for lack of <pbin.v2/libs/interprocess/test/intersegment_ptr_test.test/gcc-3.4.2/debug/threading-multi>intersegment_ptr_test... common.mkdir bin.v2/libs/interprocess/test/intrusive_ptr_test.test common.mkdir bin.v2/libs/interprocess/test/intrusive_ptr_test.test/gcc-3.4.2 common.mkdir bin.v2/libs/interprocess/test/intrusive_ptr_test.test/gcc-3.4.2/debug common.mkdir bin.v2/libs/interprocess/test/intrusive_ptr_test.test/gcc-3.4.2/debug/threading-multi gcc.compile.c++ bin.v2/libs/interprocess/test/intrusive_ptr_test.test/gcc-3.4.2/debug/threading-multi/intrusive_ptr_test.o In file included from ./boost/interprocess/detail/managed_open_or_create_impl.hpp:20, from ./boost/interprocess/managed_shared_memory.hpp:22, from libs/interprocess/test/intrusive_ptr_test.cpp:15: ./boost/interprocess/detail/atomic.hpp: In function `boost::uint32_t boost::interprocess::detail::atomic_add32(volatile boost::uint32_t*, boost::uint32_t)': ./boost/interprocess/detail/atomic.hpp:331: error: invalid conversion from `volatile uint32_t*' to `uint32_t*' ./boost/interprocess/detail/atomic.hpp:331: error: initializing argument 1 of `uint32_t atomic_add_32_nv(uint32_t*, int32_t)' ./boost/interprocess/detail/atomic.hpp: In function `boost::uint32_t boost::interprocess::detail::atomic_cas32(volatile boost::uint32_t*, boost::uint32_t, boost::uint32_t)': ./boost/interprocess/detail/atomic.hpp:341: error: `atomic_cas_32' undeclared (first use this function) ./boost/interprocess/detail/atomic.hpp:341: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in.) ./boost/interprocess/detail/atomic.hpp: In function `boost::uint32_t boost::interprocess::detail::atomic_inc32(volatile boost::uint32_t*)': ./boost/interprocess/detail/atomic.hpp:347: error: invalid conversion from `volatile uint32_t*' to `uint32_t*' ./boost/interprocess/detail/atomic.hpp:347: error: initializing argument 1 of `uint32_t atomic_add_32_nv(uint32_t*, int32_t)' ./boost/interprocess/detail/atomic.hpp: In function `boost::uint32_t boost::interprocess::detail::atomic_dec32(volatile boost::uint32_t*)': ./boost/interprocess/detail/atomic.hpp:353: error: invalid conversion from `volatile uint32_t*' to `uint32_t*' ./boost/interprocess/detail/atomic.hpp:353: error: initializing argument 1 of `uint32_t atomic_add_32_nv(uint32_t*, int32_t)' I have checked online, it suggests that solaris 9 atomic operations are not available for user code. It can only be used by kernel. Kindly suggest what may be wrong, or any workaround for the same. Regards, DS

2 1

Re: [Boost-users] detect if a type has a size_t member
by Hicham Mouline 29 Jul '09

29 Jul '09

> -----Original Message----- > From: Hicham Mouline [mailto:hicham@mouline.org] > Sent: 05 July 2009 15:36 > To: Hicham Mouline > Subject: FW: [Boost-users] detect if a type has a size_t member > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: boost-users-bounces(a)lists.boost.org [mailto:boost-users- > > bounces(a)lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of joel > > Sent: 03 July 2009 19:04 > > To: boost-users(a)lists.boost.org > > Subject: Re: [Boost-users] detect if a type has a size_t member > > > > Hicham Mouline wrote: > > > Can I put the macro inside the struct S ? I guess not. I'd write: > > > HAS_STATIC_MEMBER_NAMED(T, value) > > > > > > which would return a integral bool or a bool type > > it works liek BOOST_MPL_HAS_XXXX so put it where you want to define > > a boolean meta-function. It supports ::value and ::type return mpl > > boolean. I'm sorry I can quite get how to use it. I have this: #include <iostream> #include <boost/introspection/has_member_data.hpp> struct S { static const size_t maxsize =5; }; struct T { }; BOOST_HAS_MEMBER_DATA(S, maxsize) BOOST_HAS_MEMBER_DATA(T, maxsize) int main() { if ( boost::introspection::has_member_data_maxsize<T>::value ) { std::cout<<" T has max_size"<<std::endl; } return 0; } which doesn't build because error C2953: 'boost::introspection::has_member_data_maxsize' : class template has already been defined Hicham

6 15

Xpressive: Compile Error
by Etienne Philip Pretorius 29 Jul '09

29 Jul '09

Hello List, Code: boost::xpressive::sregex character = +_w; Dies with compiler error: /usr/include/boost/xpressive/proto/make_expr.hpp:832: error: expected nested-name-specifier before numeric constant /usr/include/boost/xpressive/proto/make_expr.hpp:832: error: expected ‘>’ before numeric constant /usr/include/boost/xpressive/proto/make_expr.hpp:837: error: type/value mismatch at argument 3 in template parameter list for ‘template<class Tag, class DomainOrA0, class A0, class A1, class A2, class A3, class A4, class Void> struct boost::proto::result_of::make_expr’ /usr/include/boost/xpressive/proto/make_expr.hpp:837: error: expected a type, got ‘0’ /usr/include/boost/xpressive/proto/make_expr.hpp:837: error: expected initializer before ‘const’ It does not matter what the expression is. Any idea why xpressive is not working? Thank you, Etienne

2 1

[Program-Options] 2 issues
by Mikhail Veygman 29 Jul '09

29 Jul '09

Hello, I am using Ubuntu 8.10 with g++ 4.3.2 and boost 1.37.0 I have two issues I have run into with program_options. 1. Minor. When using program options to read option into a short or unsigned short g++ gives me a warning of: /opt/boost/1.37.0/include/boost-1_37/boost/any.hpp: In member function ‘void boost::program_options::typed_value<T, charT>::notify(const boost::any&) const [with T = short unsigned int, charT = char]’ 2. I have a need to pass configuration into a plugin for another package. When using multiple plugins that are compiled with the program_options I run into a problem that the second plugin loaded is unable to use program_options to parse the configuration file and dies with an error of: boost::bad_any_cast: failed conversion using boost::any_cast Any assistance anyone can provide on these 2 matters? -- Regards, Mikhail Veygman

1 0

[lambda][tr1] Are the native std::tr1::function in Visual Studio and boost::lambda compatible?
by jesseperla 29 Jul '09

29 Jul '09

I am using Visual Studio 2008 SP1 with the Intel 11.0 compiler and boost 1.38. I am compiling with the pre-processor directive: BOOST_HAS_TR1 (though I am not sure this does what I thought it did does since I see boost::tuples is used below). When I use the native tr1 function, I am unable to put a boost::lambda into it (which worked fine with boost::function), I get an errors. Any ideas? Here is the sample code: using boost::lambda::_1; auto f = _1; std::tr1::function<double (double)> f2(f); std::cout << f2(2.0) << endl; Here is the error. 1>C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio 9.0\VC\include\xxfunction (73): error: no suitable conversion function from 1> "const boost::lambda::lambda_functor<boost::lambda::lambda_functor_base<boost::lambda::other_action<boost::lambda::addressof_action>, boost::tuples::tuple<boost::lambda::lambda_functor<boost::lambda::placeholder<1>>, boost::tuples::null_type, boost::tuples::null_type, boost::tuples::null_type, boost::tuples::null_type, boost::tuples::null_type, boost::tuples::null_type, boost::tuples::null_type, boost::tuples::null_type, boost::tuples::null_type>>>" to "const void *" exists 1> return (&_Callee._Get()); 1> ^ 1> detected during: 1> instantiation of "const void *std::tr1::_Impl1<_Callable, _Rx, _Arg0, _Alloc>::_Get() const [with _Callable=std::tr1::_Callable_obj<boost::lambda::lambda_functor<boost::lambda::placeholder<1>>, false>, _Rx=double, _Arg0=double, _Alloc=std::allocator<int>]" at line 46 1> instantiation of "std::tr1::_Impl1<_Callable, _Rx, _Arg0, _Alloc>::_Impl1(_Callable::_MyTy &, _Alloc::rebind<std::tr1::_Impl1<_Callable, _Rx, _Arg0, _Alloc>>::other) [with _Callable=std::tr1::_Callable_obj<boost::lambda::lambda_functor<boost::lambda::placeholder<1>>, false>, _Rx=double, _Arg0=double, _Alloc=std::allocator<int>]" at line 165 1> instantiation of "void std::tr1::_Function_impl1<_Ret, _Arg0>::_Reset(_Fty, _Alloc) [with _Ret=double, _Arg0=double, _Fty=boost::lambda::lambda_functor<boost::lambda::placeholder<1>>, _Alloc=std::allocator<int>]" at line 970 of "C:\Program Files \Microsoft Visual Studio 9.0\VC\include\functional" 1> instantiation of "std::tr1::function<_Fty>::function (_Fx) [with _Fty=double (double), _Fx=boost::lambda::lambda_functor<boost::lambda::placeholder<1>>]" at line 41 of "C:\working\libraries\etk\test\meta\test_mathfunctions.cpp"

3 3

[serialization] Polymorphic archives in 1.38
by Richard Hazlewood 29 Jul '09

29 Jul '09

I've been using serialization with polymorphic archives from boost 1.38, but I had to apply the patch given by Vladimir Prus (http://lists.boost.org/boost- users/2009/03/45658.php) to get it linking (with MSVC71). E.g.: #include <boost/archive/polymorphic_text_oarchive.hpp> #include <boost/archive/polymorphic_text_iarchive.hpp> #if BOOST_VERSION <= 103800 #include <boost/archive/impl/archive_pointer_oserializer.ipp> #include <boost/archive/impl/archive_pointer_iserializer.ipp> namespace boost { namespace archive { template class detail::archive_pointer_iserializer<polymorphic_text_oarchive>; template class detail::archive_pointer_iserializer<polymorphic_text_iarchive>; }} #endif #include <boost/serialization/export.hpp> #include <sstream> struct A { template <typename A> void serialize(A &, const unsigned) {} }; BOOST_CLASS_EXPORT(A); void test_ser() { A a; std::ostringstream ostr; boost::archive::polymorphic_text_oarchive arch(ostr); arch & a; } Can anyone tell me if this has been addressed in 1.39? I.e. does the above compile and link with 1.39 (on MSVC71)? TIA. Chard.

2 1

boost 1.40 beta
by Avi Bahra 29 Jul '09

29 Jul '09

Does any know the schedule for release of boost 1.40 beta ? Best regards, Ta, Avi

1 0

[boost] upgrade boost 1.33 up to 1.39 -> MCF assertion
by Andrey Torba 29 Jul '09

29 Jul '09

Hello everybody! When i upgrade boost form 1.33.1 up to 1.39 I get the following assertion failed error message: Debug Assertion Failed! File: F:\dd\vctools\vc7libs\ship\atlmfc\src\mfc\dllinit.cpp Line: 587 ================== void AFXAPI AfxCoreInitModule() { ASSERT(AfxGetModuleState() != AfxGetAppModuleState()); All run ok when i rollback boost. There are breaking changes in boost.Thread http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_39_0/doc/html/thread/changes.html since 1.33 Interface of scoped_lock has been changed and boost::mutex now is boost::recursive_mutex. Am i right? Did anybody experiance this problem? Any help is appreciated. -- Regards, Andrey

3 8

Is it possible to compile boost::serialization with vc7.1+stlport5.1.5?
by Li Ning 29 Jul '09

29 Jul '09

error 2039 & 2873 at boost\archive\codecvt_null.hpp(30). A problem of codecvt namespace. It seems stlport hides codecvt's namespace out of gobal. Maybe I can modify stlport's config or something else let complie success? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Is-it-possible-to-compile-boost%3A%3Aserialization-wi… Sent from the Boost - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

1 0

Re: [Boost-users] [newbie] Boost 1.39 in Mac XCode get "error: attempt to copy-construct an iterator from a singular iterator."
by Victor Tsang 29 Jul '09

29 Jul '09

I wonder how can you identify the bug in the source files as I was totally no idea when I saw the error message. Will you submit the fix to developer list? :) Regards, Victor Tsang victor.tsang(a)ieee.org From: Christopher Jefferson <chris(a)bubblescope.net> > > On 28 Jul 2009, at 09:10, Victor Tsang wrote: > > > Hi, > > ... > > > > The Debugger Debugger is attaching to process > > > > It generates a runtime error "error: attempt to copy-construct an > > iterator > > from a singular iterator.". > > > > > > However, if I compile the code in terminal: > > g++ -o test -g -Wall main.cpp -lboost_system-xgcc40-mt > > > > It runs okay without any runtime error. > > > > To duplicate the error from the command line, add ' -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG ' > to the command line, which turns on g++'s iterator debugging. Doing > this, I can duplicate your problem. > > The problem can be boiled down to the following, illegal, code. > > #include <vector> > #include <list> > > int main(void) > { > std::vector<std::list<int>::iterator> v; > v.resize(1); > } > > The code can be fixed (although there may be other occurrences of > similar problems) by changing around line 220 on asio/detail/ > hash_map.hpp from: > > // Update number of buckets and initialise all buckets to empty. > buckets_.resize(num_buckets); > for (std::size_t i = 0; i < buckets_.size(); ++i) > buckets_[i].first = buckets_[i].last = end; > > to: > > // Update number of buckets and initialise all buckets to empty. > bucket_type bucket; > bucket.first = bucket.last = end; > buckets_.resize(num_buckets, bucket); > > I'm surprised boost isn't tested with iterator checking. Any > particular reason, or has simply no-one tried? >

1 0