- Boost-users - lists.boost.org

boost timers
by Mark Wyszomierski 06 Nov '07

06 Nov '07

Hi, Do any of the boost timer methods allow elapsed time to be measured in a separate thread? Something like: int main() { boost_thread timer; timer.Start(); while () { // some timeout. sleep(5000); // check how much time has passed. cout << timer.GetElapsedTime() << endl; } return 0; } Thanks

2 2

[program options] storing values into a set instead of vector?
by Ovanes Markarian 06 Nov '07

06 Nov '07

Hello all! I would like to allow only unique parameters to be stored: param = X param = Y param = X should result in a collection of {X, Y} Therefore I want my params to be stored in a set instead of vector? Is there any chance to implement/specify it without putting the params into the vector of strings and re-inserting them into a set? Doing it the way: value<string_set>() result in an error. Some other question? As I see "program options" works only with basic_strings<charT>, where it is assumed that the traits class is default. What if I wish to specify my traits class for the basic_string will it work? Many thanks! Ovanes

1 0

Starting ThreadClass including Mutexes
by Honki 06 Nov '07

06 Nov '07

Hi boost-users, I'm new in the mailing list, so I hope, that I'm right here and you can help me. I want to start a ThreadClass that includes some boost::mutex variables, but it doesn't work because of the "noncopyable" definition of the mutex-class. *******************MyClass******************* ...... class OutputProcessor_C { public: ClientOutputProcessor_C(); virtual ~ClientOutputProcessor_C(); void operator()() { while( true ) { boost::xtime wakeUpTime; boost::xtime_get(&wakeUpTime, boost::TIME_UTC); wakeUpTime.sec += ( 0.05 ); boost::thread::sleep( wakeUpTime ); Process(); } } protected: void Process(); boost::mutex m_publishDataMutex; ...... ********************************************* *******************MyMain******************** ...... int main(int argc, char* argv[]) { // Classpointer boost::shared_ptr<OutputProcessor_C()> outputProcessor(new OutputProcessor_C()); // generate Thread boost::shared_ptr<boost::thread> threadOutputProcessor(new boost::thread(*outputProcessor)); ...... ********************************************* When I tried to compile the source code, there is an error - "It is not possible to copy the constructor for the class 'boost::mutex'". Where is the problem? I don't want to copy anything. If it is not possible to generate a simple thread class that includes some mutexes, that is really weak. Greetings, Matthias

2 1

[thread] static mutex construction
by Pedro Lamarão 06 Nov '07

06 Nov '07

Hello all, I've been wondering how boost::mutex plays in the static initialization game. I'm toying with a "plugin" system where plugins statically register with a singleton plugin_manager using a helper struct like this: template <typename PluginT> struct register_plugin { register_plugin () { shared_ptr<plugin_base> ptr(new PluginT); plugin_manager::instance().register(ptr); } }; static register_plugin objects, specialized for each plugin type, are constructed in an anonymous namespace to register the plugin at static initialization time, like so: namespace { register_plugin<foo_plugin> rp; } plugin_manager::instance() looks like: { static plugin_manager* s_instance; // s_mutex is a static member { boost::mutex::scoped_lock lock(s_mutex); if (s_instance == 0) { s_instance = new plugin_manager; } } return *s_instance; } So far I've implemented two plugins in this application and everything just works. It seems to me there is a static initialization race between every register_plugin object and plugin_manager::s_mutex. Am I just lucky or is there some magic about mutexes in this regard? I'm working on a Fedora 7 i386 system. -- Pedro Lamarão

2 1

[crc] Easy way to get the "correct checksum" constant?
by Norbert Unterberg 06 Nov '07

06 Nov '07

Some CRC algorithms (when using 0xFFFF as an initial value and final XOR) have a nice property that then checking the consistency of a data block that has a CRC checksum appended, the resulting checksum value is a constant. Is there an easy way to extract this constant value from boost::crc directly? Example: We use a CRC like this: typedef boost::crc_optimal<16, 0x1021, 0xFFFF, 0xFFFF, true, true> crc_type; When sending a block of data, we append the generated CRC. The receiver side feeds the complete block incluing the CRC bytes into its generator. When the data block has no errors, the crc.checksum() is always exactly 0x0F47. Currently, I manually calculate that constant by something like this: crc_type crc; crc_type::value_type val(0); crc.process_bytes(&val, sizeof(val)); m_key = crc.checksum(); Is there an easier way to extract this "crc is correct" value? Norbert

1 0

boost-users [boost::function] template.
by chun ping wang 04 Nov '07

04 Nov '07

Hi I have a problem with boost::function in association with template. I have a gain function declaration declare as this.. template < template <typename ELEM,typename = std::allocator<ELEM> > class CONT, typename T, typename U > long double gain(const CONT<boost::unordered_map<T, U> >& data, const T& attr, const T& target_attr); // old signature does compile template < template <typename ELEM,typename = std::allocator<ELEM> > class CONT, typename T, typename U > boost::any ID3( const CONT<boost::unordered_map<T, U> >&, const T&, const CONT<T> &, boost::function<long double (const CONT<boost::unordered_map<T, U> >&, const T&, const T&) > ); // new signature DOES NOT compile. template < template <typename ELEM,typename = std::allocator<ELEM> > class CONT, typename T, typename U > boost::any ID3( const CONT<boost::unordered_map<T, U> >&, const T&, CONT<T> *, boost::function<long double (const CONT<boost::unordered_map<T, U> >&, const T&, const T&) > ); In the main file i have things pass as this. // old way of passing works with old signature boost::any tree( MyAnn::ID3<std::vector, std::string, std::string>(data, target_attr, attribute, MyAnn::gain<std::vector, std::string, std::string>) ); // line 76 to 82. boost::function<long double (const std::vector<boost::unordered_map<std::string, std::string>&, const std::string&, const std::string&)> gainfunc; gainfunc = MyAnn::gain<std::vector, std::string, std::string>; boost::any tree( MyAnn::ID3<std::vector, std::string, std::string>(data, target_attr, boost::addressof(attribute), gainfunc) ); I compile the file and get teh following errors. Can anyone tell me why changing the orginial signature from const CONT<T>& to CONT<T> * all of sudden breaks the code. Thanks.

1 1

回复： [Boost-users] "Getting Started" document : missing documentation of the stdlib flag
by 鑫赖 04 Nov '07

04 Nov '07

Hi: Thank you.I try it! _______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users(a)lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users ___________________________________________________________ 雅虎邮箱，终生伙伴！ http://mail.yahoo.com.cn/

1 0

回复： [Boost-users] How can change library name!
by 鑫赖 04 Nov '07

04 Nov '07

The "p" in the name means that you are using STLport: and that means you must use STLport when you build the regex lib as well. Take a look at the getting started guide for instructions, but you should end up with a "p" in the name once regex has been built against STLport. Hi, John: Thank you very much. So how to build boost library with STLPort, or can you tell me where to find the documents.I have read boost document, but I can't find instruction! Robin ___________________________________________________________ @yahoo.cn 新域名、无限量，快来抢注！ http://mail.yahoo.cn/

1 0

Serializing abstract classes
by Christoph 03 Nov '07

03 Nov '07

Consider the following class hierarchy: A - B - C1 \- B2 - C2 Is the following correct: * when A is an abstract class then (without any data members!) then I do not need to provide serialization support for this class * when A does have data members (and so does C) but B does not add any data and B furthermore is abstract (so the actuall class will be C1..) then no searialization support is needed for B? Is this correct? Should I provide serialization support for these classes even *if* it is correct? Best regards and thank you Christoph

2 1

boost::concept_check: ConceptConcept missing!
by Mattias Nissler 03 Nov '07

03 Nov '07

Hi, I've just recently started using boost::concept_check. It suits my needs very well and works perfectly so far. However, today I've come across something that is missing: The ConceptConcept! What I mean is a meta concept that checks whether a given template is a concept checking class. It should be relatively straightforward to implement, here is some example code I've cooked up: #include <boost/concept_check.hpp> template<template<typename T> class _TConcept> struct ConceptConcept { /* Instead of int, any type allowed as template parameter should do. */ _TConcept<int> c; void constraints() { /* Require the constraints() function to exist in _TConcept. */ c.constraints(); } }; template<template<typename TX> class T> void function() { boost::function_requires< ConceptConcept<T> >(); } template<typename T> struct NoConcept { }; int main(void) { function<boost::IntegerConcept>(); //function<NoConcept>(); // <- fails, NoConcept::constraints() is missing. } Note that due to the template template technique, this only works for ConceptConcept. Higher meta levels (e.g. ConceptConceptConcept) are not supported by this code. I'd like to see this in boost::concept_check. What do you think? Cheers, - Mattias

2 2