- Boost-users - lists.boost.org

Boost Preprocessor - Nested repeat?
by midnight2silverlake 11 Dec '02

11 Dec '02

I have what looks like a perfect application for Boost/Preprocessor. I have 192 entries in a Factory Map a portion of which are show below. I'd like to generate the permutations of the three macro inputs, but can't figure out where to start. Any help would be appreciated. #define MAP_ENTRY_MCR( aLang, aType, aAcc ) \ \ mMap[ CKey( aLang, aType, aAcc ) ] \ = CVarX< aLang, aType, aAcc >::Make; MAP_ENTRY_MCR( DCTlanguageC, DCT_DOUBLE , DCT_NONE ); MAP_ENTRY_MCR( DCTlanguageC, DCT_DOUBLE , DCT_INIT ); MAP_ENTRY_MCR( DCTlanguageC, DCT_DOUBLE , DCT_ANYTIME ); MAP_ENTRY_MCR( DCTlanguageC, DCT_FLOAT , DCT_NONE ); ... Thanks, Jeff Flinn

4 9

Errors running thread samples on W2K
by Mahendra Chheda <mchheda＠yahoo.com> 11 Dec '02

11 Dec '02

Hi, I downloaded boost recently and compiled it on my win2000 server using VC++ ver 7.0 (VS.Net) I then compiled some samples from an article by Bill Kempf (http://www.cuj.com/articles/2002/0205/0205a/0205a.htm? topic=articles). I have defined the debug version of boost libs (boost_threadmon.lib & libboost_thread.lib) in my link process. My code samples do compile and link without any errors. However, I seem to be hitting a common error across most of the samples. The error msg is: Assertion failed: !this->empty(), file D:\MMC\Code\boost_1_29_0 \boost/function/f unction_template.hpp, line 324 Assertion failed: !this->empty(), file D:\MMC\Code\boost_1_29_0 \boost/function/f unction_template.hpp, line 324 I get an abort screen to stop my code. Has anyone seen this before. Can someone pls guide me on how to fix this. Thanx. Mahendra

1 0

Which doorway
by Malcolm Smith 10 Dec '02

10 Dec '02

I'm no expert on these type of libraries but I have come to the point where I must find time to study *this* library more. I have a current project that requires some re-writes in specific areas and I'm hoping Boost will be able to make this job easier. Is there something in boost that will ease the implementation of a state-machine type functor. As an example, I am using a 3rd party C++Builder component that makes socket connections to hardware devices. I need to modify the connection code so 'what needs to be done after a connection success/failure' is handled in the appropriate events. The thing is, this connection event can be called due to connections in other areas of the application under different conditions. If I can implement a state based connection handler then I could re-direct the calls to the appropriate (alternate) event. As an example (I'm only just starting to read up on the STL), I know I could use a std::map to hold state values as the key and call the appropriate handler via a pointer to a function in .second - what I'm hoping is there is a library that allows for unrestricted function signatures (different parameter lists) to be associated with state values. To make this clearer // I know this is not valid code but it explains what I'm after typedef std::map<int, *pf(...)> StateFunctions; void Method1(void); int Method2(TCustomClass &MyClass); StateFunctions[1] = Method1; StateFunctions[2] = Method2; Does this make sense to anyone ? I've probably got all the terminology wrong so feel free to correct me where ever applicable. Thanks in advance. -- Malcolm Smith MJ Freelancing- http://www.mjfreelancing.com Software Protection for C++Builder Borland Technology Partner

2 3

Regex++ for CE? Also, trimming code size.
by Brady Reed 10 Dec '02

10 Dec '02

I am very interested in the Unicode version of this library for some Pocket PC apps. Is anyone aware of any ports of regex++ to Windows CE? The dll version of the parser seems to be rather large, about œ meg for the release version, and 600K for the debug version. This seems to be very large (the gnu rx parser is well below 100K), and I would expect there to be a greater difference in the code size between debug and release versions. Is there a way to cut this code sized down? Or do I need to do something different to build it? Thanks, Brady Reed _________________________________________________________________ MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus

2 1

parent_iterator
by matt 09 Dec '02

09 Dec '02

I am a newbie to the graph library. I have a directed graph, and given a vertex_descriptor, I would like to access its parents. It is sort of an adjacency_iterator in reverse I believe. Is there such a thing, or do i have to derive it from and existing iterator...? Thanks, Matt

1 0

Python: C++ parse tree tools?
by William Trenker <wtrenker＠hotmail.com> 09 Dec '02

09 Dec '02

Does anyone know if there is a GCC option to save the C++ parse tree to a file? Or has anyone come across a C++ parser utility that does this? I'm building a Python extension for a library that has many .hpp files and I would like to try and automate the generation of the Boost.Python headers for this library. Thanks, Bill

3 2

Regex Match() Abortion
by eydelber 07 Dec '02

07 Dec '02

This probably is annoying me to no end. I have a string that I am matching against a pattern called 'sql'. My program tests 'sql' against 14 possible patterns. The patterns are in an array of strings. EVERYTHING works except for the last pattern. And even then, only when the 2nd sub-expression is longer than a certain length. For example, this works: insert into test (one,two,three) values () Through a lot of testing, I have seen that after the comma delimitted list in the second sub-expression surpasses a certain length, then my program gets aborted at the line if(sqlRegex.Match (sql)) { I am running the latest version of boost regex++, and I am running g++ 2.96 on Linux. I ran gdb, and I seemed to have narrowed down the problem to c_str(), but this is not logical. Here is the part of my program: string checks[] = { /* 0 */ "create table (_ID_) (\\(((\\s*,?\\s*(_ID_) (_TYPES_)( not null)?( unique)?( default ((\\d+(\\.\\d+)?)|(\"[^\"] *\")))?( unique)?\\s*)+)\\))", /* 1 */ "show tables", /* 2 */ "drop table (_ID_)", /* 3 */ "show tdb\\.xml", /* 4 */ "desc( table)? (_ID_)", /* 5 */ "alter table (_ID_) add( column)? ((_ID_) (_TYPES_) ( not null)?( unique)?( default ((\\d+(\\.\\d+)?)|(\"[^\"]*\")))?( unique)?( first| after (_ID_))?)", /* 6 */ "alter table (_ID_) drop( column)? (_ID_)", /* 7 */ "alter table (_ID_) add( column)? \\(((\\s*,?\\s* (_ID_) (_TYPES_)( not null)?( unique)?( default ((\\d+(\\.\\d+)?)| (\"[^\"]*\")))?( unique)?( first| after (_ID_))?\\s*)+)\\)", /* 8 */ "rename table (_ID_) (to|as) (_ID_)", /* 9 */ "alter table (_ID_) alter( column)? (_ID_) (set default ((\\d+(\\.\\d+)?)|(\"[^\"]*\"))|drop default)", /* 10 */ "alter table (_ID_) modify( column)? ((_ID_) (_TYPES_)( not null)?( unique)?( default ((\\d+(\\.\\d+)?)|(\"[^\"] *\")))?( unique)?( first| after (_ID_))?)", /* 11 */ "alter table (_ID_) change( column)? (_ID_) ((_ID_) (_TYPES_)( not null)?( unique)?( default ((\\d+(\\.\\d+)?)|(\"[^\"] *\")))?( unique)?( first| after (_ID_))?)", /* 12 */ "alter table (_ID_) rename( to| as) (_ID_)", /* 13 */ "insert( into)? (_ID_)( \\(((\\s*,?\\s*(_ID_)\\s*)+) \\))? values \\(\\)" }; int checksLength = sizeof checks / sizeof *checks; int i; RegEx sqlRegex; for(i=0;i<checksLength;i++) { sqlRegex.SetExpression(checks[i],true); if(sqlRegex.Match(sql)) { break; } } The interesting thing is that the first string, checks[0] is similar to the insert syntax, and when I use a very long string for the create table syntax, it works perfectly fine. Also, I tried just adding another element to checks, just trying, but that didn't work. Also, I had no such problem for the other 12 cases, it only happens with this last insert case. Any help will be greatly appreciated, I have been stuck on this for days!! Thanks, Kevin

5 13

Missing bjam executable
by Jacek Generowicz 06 Dec '02

06 Dec '02

I'm trying to install Boost on Linux, but the bjam executable http://boost.sourceforge.net/jam-executables/bin.linuxx86/bjam.gz seems to be missing. Is this a known problem, or am I missing something obvious ?

2 1

RE: [Boost-Users] object_pool use ordered_malloc ordered_free. wh y?
by scleary＠jerviswebb.com 06 Dec '02

06 Dec '02

> if construct only, and freeall in ~object_pool. i think it is good. Yes. The destuctor of object_pool will call the destructor of each allocated or constructed object that has not yet been deallocated or destroyed. > can i use object_pool to replace 'new delete'? object_pool provides object-based allocation and deallocation, very similar to new and delete. > the destroy is slow. Destroying single objects that were created from an object_pool uses ordered_free, as you discovered. An object_pool will keep its free list ordered, so that it can run through the "list of allocated objects" in O(N) time instead of O(N**2) time in ~object_pool. It's a performance tradeoff with object_pool::destroy; object_pool was designed more for a "allocate a bunch of objects and then destroy all of them" type of scenario. -Steve

2 1

RE: [Boost-Users] Boost.Threads question
by James Zappia 05 Dec '02

05 Dec '02

> Thanks for all you help. I have a few new questions now, though. ;) > Again, I'm a newbie to C++ so this may seem stupid... > > I created a boost::thread object and even though it goes out of scope, > the thread continues to run. > >As it should, and as it's well documented. The boost::thread object is >analogous to a std::fstream, where the file doesn't get deleted when the >object goes out of scope. In other words, it's just a handle to the >actual running thread. Understood. > Also, when passing a class with the > operator() defined to boost::thread, it constructs and destructs the > object several times which seems odd. > >Also well documented, and essential. If this didn't occur, you'd have to >insure the lifetime of the object passed was longer than the lifetime of >the thread of execution (not the boost::thread object, the actual thread >of execution). Understood. > What I'm basically trying to do > is run a thread, have that thread lock a timed_mutex, then do its job. > Then, in main, I try to lock the same timed_mutex and if I can't get a > lock before the time expires, I need to terminate the thread. Below is > the source code and the output generated. My questions are below, after > the output. > > SOURCE: > #include <iostream> > #include <boost/thread/xtime.hpp> > #include <boost/thread/thread.hpp> > #include <boost/thread/exceptions.hpp> > > using namespace std; > > boost::timed_mutex mutex; > > class thread_class > { > public: > explicit thread_class(int sleep): _sleep(sleep) {}; > > void operator()() > { > boost::xtime xt; > > cout << "thread: locking mutex\n"; > boost::timed_mutex::scoped_timed_lock lock(mutex,true); > >Why do you continue to use this syntax? This performs an explicit lock, >not a timed lock. This overload is for two use cases: > >1) Creating an unlocked lock object: > >scoped_time_lock lock(mutex, false); > >2) Creating a locked lock object which later will be unlocked and then >locked again through a timed lock: > >scoped_time_lock lock(mutex, true); >// .. some code >lock.unlock(); >// .. some code >if (lock.timed_lock()) { > // .. some code >} > >Obviously the second use case will be extremely rare. In your case you're >doing neither of these, and you'd be better served just using a simple >scoped_lock. > > boost::xtime_get(&xt,boost::TIME_UTC); > > cout << "thread: sleeping for " << _sleep << " seconds\n"; > > xt.sec += _sleep; > boost::thread::sleep(xt); > > cout << "thread: freeing lock -- goodbye\n"; > } > > ~thread_class() { cout << "thread_class destructed\n"; } > > private: > int _sleep; > }; > > int main( void ) > { > { > cout << "main: creating thread\n"; > > thread_class test(10); > boost::thread thrd(test); > > cout << "main: sleeping for 2 seconds\n"; > sleep(2); > > cout << "main: trying to lock mutex -- waiting 5 > seconds...\n"; > > boost::timed_mutex::scoped_timed_lock lock(mutex,false); > > boost::xtime xt; > boost::xtime_get(&xt,boost::TIME_UTC); > xt.sec += 5; > > if ( lock.timed_lock(xt) ) > { > cout << "obtain lock -- joining thread\n"; > thrd.join(); > } > else > { > cout << "failed to obtain lock\n"; > } > } > >I'd code this as: > >boost::xtime xt; >boost::xtime_get(&xt, boost::TIME_UTC); >xt.sec += 5; >boost::timed_mutex::scoped_time_lock lock(mutex); >if (lock) // or if (lock.locked()) >{ >// etc I assume you mean boost::timed_mutex::scoped_timed_lock lock(mutex,xt) because I don't see a constructor that takes only a timed_mutex. That said, I agree that your way of doing it is better. Above you asked why I continue to use the syntax I do for locking the mutex in the thread. I want to immediately lock it, then in the main thread try to lock it for a finite amount of time. I can't do that with scoped_lock. Perhaps my strategy is wrong. I want to run a thread for only a specified amount of time. I can't afford to block on a join() to wait for that thread to finish. > cout << "main: making sure thread is gone\n"; > >That's what join is for. I realize this is a toy example, but I can't see >a valid reason for coding it this way. All you've done is introduce race >conditions, even if they are conditions you can feel fairly confident will >do what you want. > > sleep(10); > > return 0; > } > > OUTPUT: > main: creating thread > thread_class destructed > thread_class destructed > thread_class destructed > thread_class destructed > main: sleeping for 2 seconds > thread: locking mutex > thread: sleeping for 10 seconds > main: trying to lock mutex -- waiting 5 seconds... > failed to obtain lock > thread_class destructed > main: making sure thread is gone > thread: freeing lock -- goodbye > thread_class destructed > > 1) Why are so many thread_class objects constructed/destructed when > calling boost::thread? > >The number surprises me a little. I'd have expected two copies, knowing >what I do about the implementation and with out carefully evaluating the >code here. But the documentation is clear that the object will be copied >AT LEAST once, and is free to copy the object any number of times. You >need to account for this in your implementation if it matters. Understood. Apologies for not thoroughly reading the doc first. > 2) After the thread object (test) goes out of scope, why does the thread > continue to run? Is it copied when calling boost::thread and run > detached from the main thread? > >I don't know what you mean by "run detached from the main thread", but >yes, test IS copied (but then, you know that based on what you asked in >1). But then, maybe you meant something else. The "thread object" is >actually "thrd" in your code above, not "test". > > 3) Is there a way I can cancel a thread if going out of scope doesn't > stop it? > >Not yet, but there will be. However, I'm not sure that what you want to >do is really to cancel the thread. It's hard to tell from this toy >example. What the application does is run a job (thread) that has a finite amount of time to finish. If it doesn't finish in that time it needs to send an alert and explicitly terminate the thread (because it can't be blocked with a join() unless it knows the thread is done). As stated above, perhaps my strategy of using the mutex to see if a thread ran in a given amount of time is wrong. Hopefully I'm making some sense, if not, I apologies. James >William E. Kempf Info: <http://www.boost.org> Wiki: <http://www.crystalclearsoftware.com/cgi-bin/boost_wiki/wiki.pl> Unsubscribe: <mailto:boost-users-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

2 1