- Boost-users - lists.boost.org

Re: [Boost-users] [Date_Time] Visual Studio 8 debugger visualizer
by Bruno Durin 17 Apr '10

17 Apr '10

Hi, > Now that's cool. If you agree, I will add the usual headers to your file > (so I need you to agree to make this available under the Boost license) > and put it on the visualizers wiki page for everyone to download. Definitely. I agree for the Boost licence and the wiki page. Thanks, Bruno

3 4

Re: [Boost-users] [circular_buffer] About overwriting elements
by Daniele Barzotti 17 Apr '10

17 Apr '10

> Hi Daniele, > > The circular_buffer behaves like a sliding window - which is what you don't > want apparently. If you want the behaviour you described have a look at > array_one() and array_two() methods. > With regards, > > Jan Hi Jan, I haven't seen them! They are exatcly what I need! Regards, Daniele.

1 0

Re: [Boost-users] Inconsistent dll linkage trying to use boost/test as dll
by McNamara, Nate 17 Apr '10

17 Apr '10

Thanks for the quick response. Your hint plus a few tweaks to the Makefile and the test compiles again - and much faster. Unfortunately, when I run the test, I get the following unhelpful message: The application failed to initialize properly (0xc0150002). Click on OK to terminate the application. Here is the entirety of my program: #define BOOST_TEST_MODULE foo #define BOOST_TEST_DYN_LINK #include <boost/test/unit_test.hpp> BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(my_test) { BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(4, 4); } I got the same error when I tried #define BOOST_TEST_MAIN in place of BOOST_TEST_MODULE as well; as far as I can tell from the docs they are equivalent when using the dynamic library variant: http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_42_0/libs/test/doc/html/utf/compilation. html Thanks again for your help! Nate ________________________________________ This E-Mail (including any attachments) may contain privileged or confidential information. It is intended only for the addressee(s) indicated above. The sender does not waive any of its rights, privileges or other protections respecting this information. Any distribution, copying or other use of this E-Mail or the information it contains, by other than an intended recipient, is not sanctioned and is prohibited. If you received this E-Mail in error, please delete it and advise the sender (by return E-Mail or otherwise) immediately. This E-Mail (including any attachments) has been scanned for viruses. It is believed to be free of any virus or other defect that might affect any computer system into which it is received and opened. However, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free. The sender accepts no responsibility for any loss or damage arising in any way from its use. E-Mail received by or sent from RBC Capital Markets is subject to review by Supervisory personnel. Such communications are retained and may be produced to regulatory authorities or others with legal rights to the information. IRS CIRCULAR 230 NOTICE: TO COMPLY WITH U.S. TREASURY REGULATIONS, WE ADVISE YOU THAT ANY U.S. FEDERAL TAX ADVICE INCLUDED IN THIS COMMUNICATION IS NOT INTENDED OR WRITTEN TO BE USED, AND CANNOT BE USED, TO AVOID ANY U.S. FEDERAL TAX PENALTIES OR TO PROMOTE, MARKET, OR RECOMMEND TO ANOTHER PARTY ANY TRANSACTION OR MATTER.

2 1

[Spirit] still stuck on expectation points
by philip tucker 17 Apr '10

17 Apr '10

Hello, Here's a summary of my problem: My original fully functioning grammar was this: start %= (constitkind >> id >> ':' >> id >> probs) % ","; // WORKS where - constitkind exposes unsigned, - id exposes string, - probs exposes a list of doubles, - start exposes a list of constituent structures (Is that jargon acceptable?) It recognizes strings such as a:b, foo:bar [ 0.00 ], extraposed x:y [ 0.00, 0.50, 0.99, 1.0 ], optional z:a [ 0.00, 0.50, 0.99, 1.0 ] I wanted to replace the grammar with this (note the expectation points which replace sequence operators): start %= (constitkind > id > ':' > id >> probs) % ","; // FAILS That won't compile. All I can glean from the error report is that I've induced a type mismatch. What's wrong? I got as far as this by thrashing: start %= (constitkind >> (id > ':') >> id >> probs) % ","; // WORKS Why do the parentheses in (id > ':') permit compilation? Thanks very much for any help you can give me.

1 0

Compiler's telling me a Boost class isn't a class.
by G S 17 Apr '10

17 Apr '10

Hi all. Just started using Boost, and these three lines (which compile in another project) fail here: // Get a list of endpoints corresponding to the server name. tcp::resolver theResolver(boost::asio::io_service); tcp::resolver::query query("10.10.10.10", "http"); tcp::resolver::iterator endpoint_iterator = theResolver.resolve(query); The compiler gripes thus: error: request for member 'resolve' in 'theResolver', which is of non-class type 'boost::asio::ip::basic_resolver<boost::asio::ip::tcp, boost::asio::ip::resolver_service<boost::asio::ip::tcp> > ()(boost::asio::io_service)' "using boost::asio::ip::tcp;" appears in an earlier included file. I don't see why this would work elsewhere and not here. Anybody have a guess as to what the problem is? Thanks!

2 2

[test] spread case over multiple translation units
by Jeff Flinn 16 Apr '10

16 Apr '10

Is it possible have multiple cpp's linked for a single master test suite? Doing the naive below results int multiply defined symbols linker errror. See below: suite1.cpp ------------------------------------- #define BOOST_TEST_MAIN #define BOOST_TEST_MODULE Master #include <boost/test/unit_test.hpp> BOOST_AUTO_TEST_SUITE(Sweet1) BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(TestCase1) { BOOST_CHECK (true); BOOST_REQUIRE(true); BOOST_REQUIRE(true); BOOST_CHECK (true); } BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(TestCase2) { BOOST_CHECK (true); BOOST_REQUIRE(true); BOOST_REQUIRE(true); BOOST_CHECK (true); } BOOST_AUTO_TEST_SUITE_END() suite2.cpp ------------------------------------------ #define BOOST_TEST_MAIN #define BOOST_TEST_MODULE Master #include <boost/test/unit_test.hpp> BOOST_AUTO_TEST_SUITE(Sweet2) BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(TestCaseA) { BOOST_CHECK (true); BOOST_REQUIRE(true); BOOST_REQUIRE(true); BOOST_CHECK (true); } BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(TestCaseB) { BOOST_CHECK (true); BOOST_REQUIRE(true); BOOST_REQUIRE(true); BOOST_CHECK (true); } BOOST_AUTO_TEST_SUITE_END()

1 1

UTF : capturing asserts
by Carla Strembicke 16 Apr '10

16 Apr '10

Hi, Just started using the BOOST unit test framework. I have legacy code that exercises asserts. This resided on both a linux and windows platform. Using 1.42 release of boost. Is there a method in which to capture assert so as to pass a test ( like BOOST_REQUIRE_THROW)? It is either that, compile code without debug on ( which I wouldn't want to do if debugging) or replace all asserts which would be painful considering it is legacy code. Regards CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION NOTICE: The information contained in this e-mail is privileged, confidential and intended solely for the use of the addressee named above. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and destroy all copies of this e-mail. Thank you.

3 2

Inconsistent dll linkage trying to use boost/test as dll
by McNamara, Nate 16 Apr '10

16 Apr '10

I'm a newbie, and I'm trying to get the most basic example unit test up and running. The following works: #define BOOST_TEST_MAIN #include <boost/test/included/unit_test.hpp> BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(my_test) { BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(4, 4); } However, it takes a while to compile, so I want to use the DLL version of the library. I built the DLL according to the instructions here: http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_42_0/libs/test/doc/html/utf/compilation/ standalone.html Then I updated my source as follows: #define BOOST_TEST_DYN_LINK #include <boost/test/included/unit_test.hpp> BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(my_test) { BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(4, 4); } When compiling the above, though, I get a seemingly unending stream of C4273 warnings: C:\Program Files\\boost\boost_1_42\boost/test/impl/compiler_log_formatter.ipp(61 ) : warning C4273: 'boost::unit_test::output::compiler_log_formatter::log_start' : inconsistent dll linkage C:\Program Files\\boost\boost_1_42\boost/test/output/compiler_log_format ter.hpp(39) : see previous definition of 'log_start' C:\Program Files\\boost\boost_1_42\boost/test/impl/compiler_log_formatter.ipp(71 ) : warning C4273: 'boost::unit_test::output::compiler_log_formatter::log_finish ' : inconsistent dll linkage C:\Program Files\\boost\boost_1_42\boost/test/output/compiler_log_format ter.hpp(40) : see previous definition of 'log_finish' C:\Program Files\\boost\boost_1_42\boost/test/impl/compiler_log_formatter.ipp(79 ) : warning C4273: 'boost::unit_test::output::compiler_log_formatter::log_build_ info' : inconsistent dll linkage etc. Any hints re: what I'm doing wrong are much appreciated. Cheers, Nate ________________________________________ This E-Mail (including any attachments) may contain privileged or confidential information. It is intended only for the addressee(s) indicated above. The sender does not waive any of its rights, privileges or other protections respecting this information. Any distribution, copying or other use of this E-Mail or the information it contains, by other than an intended recipient, is not sanctioned and is prohibited. If you received this E-Mail in error, please delete it and advise the sender (by return E-Mail or otherwise) immediately. This E-Mail (including any attachments) has been scanned for viruses. It is believed to be free of any virus or other defect that might affect any computer system into which it is received and opened. However, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free. The sender accepts no responsibility for any loss or damage arising in any way from its use. E-Mail received by or sent from RBC Capital Markets is subject to review by Supervisory personnel. Such communications are retained and may be produced to regulatory authorities or others with legal rights to the information. IRS CIRCULAR 230 NOTICE: TO COMPLY WITH U.S. TREASURY REGULATIONS, WE ADVISE YOU THAT ANY U.S. FEDERAL TAX ADVICE INCLUDED IN THIS COMMUNICATION IS NOT INTENDED OR WRITTEN TO BE USED, AND CANNOT BE USED, TO AVOID ANY U.S. FEDERAL TAX PENALTIES OR TO PROMOTE, MARKET, OR RECOMMEND TO ANOTHER PARTY ANY TRANSACTION OR MATTER.

2 1

[boost.test] 0 return code with expected failures?
by Ahmed Badran 16 Apr '10

16 Apr '10

Hi, I have a binary that runs unit tests, 3 tests fail and these tests I have marked as being expected failures after analysis. The binary however produces a non-zero exit code even with these tests marked as expected failures . Is there a way to have the binary return a zero exit code when all the failures are expected and non-zero when some other non-expected failure happens? The test setup uses automatic test registration. Regards, Ahmed

2 7

BOOST_HAS_RVALUE_REFERENCES and Visual Studio 2010 support
by Marat Abrarov 16 Apr '10

16 Apr '10

As I see Boost C++ Libraries (1.42) doesn't support rvalue references under Visual C++ 10.0 (Visual Studio 2010) - there is no definition of BOOST_HAS_RVALUE_REFERENCES (and BOOST_NO_RVALUE_REFERENCES too) for Visual C++ 10.0. Does anybody know why it is so and when will it be supported? (and will it be so?) Regards, Marat.

1 0