10 Dec
2005
10 Dec
'05
10:02 a.m.
Daniel Wallin <dalwan01@student.umu.se> writes:
David Abrahams wrote:
"Paul Mensonides" <pmenso57@comcast.net> writes:
However, it would be nice to have a clean Boost library in parallel to the hacked to death Boost library (which is what we have now), and challenge implementors to support that.
Great idea! Why don't we add a simple way to make all BOOST_WORKAROUNDs turn off?
I think there already is:
#define BOOST_STRICT_CONFIG
See boost/detail/workaround.hpp
Oh, right, I forgot. So anyone who wants to start an embarrass-the-nonconforming-vendors campaign is free to do so. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com