yes i thought too, sadly at this point changing from Lattice* lat(filename"); to Lattice lat("filename"); means changing many lines of code of the algorithm asociated (which was initially a secuential program) anyways, this whole experience and problems debugging, resulted in a lot of learning. On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 5:53 PM, Robert Ramey <ramey@rrsd.com> wrote:
Cristobal Navarro wrote:
i found the problem, and found a solution, but would be better if i learn some explanations of you guys which know much more.
problem was that i was sending the pointer of my object { Lattice* lat = new Lattice("filename"); world.send(1, 1, lat); } that generated the errors on the packing algorithms i suppose (correct me if im wrong)
so instead of changing all my program i only sent the object pointed
world.send(1, 1, *lat );
and on the receiver process i receive it with
Lattice lat; world.recv(0, 1, lat);
then i can transform it to pointer again to keep my algorithms unchanged,
Lattice plat = ⪫
i wonder, is this a good approach to solve the error i was having?? at least does work and i can continue programming, which makes me happy :)
If it were me I would declare
world.send(?, ?, const Lattice & lat); world.recv(0, 1, Lattice & lat);
then: Lattice lat("filename");
world.send(1, 1, lat); and Lattice lat; world.recv(0, 1, lat);
transparent, easy and guarenteed correct.
Robert Ramey
_______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users