
7 Sep
2012
7 Sep
'12
11:35 a.m.
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 11:32 AM, James Mathiesen <james-mathiesen@pobox.com>wrote:
This use case seems really common and I was surprised it gave me problems.
I assume that nullptr_t in C++11 fixes this but then I was wondering if the cases were basic and common enough it would make sense to have a BOOST_CHECK_NULL / BOOST_CHECK_NOT_NULL and the assorted variants.
Use "0" instead of NULL. -- Chris Cleeland