On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Peter Dimov <pdimov@pdimov.com> wrote:
using boost::lambda::bind;
should be a better choice.
Hello Peter Yes, that was my first thought too. But this code still has ambiguity issues. #include <boost/lambda/lambda.hpp> #include <boost/lambda/bind.hpp> #include <boost/function.hpp> #include <boost/range.hpp> #include <vector> #include <numeric> // and also this... #include <boost/bind.hpp> struct X { int f( ) const { return 1; } }; int sum( int a, int b ) { return a + b; } int main( ) { using boost::lambda::bind; boost::lambda::placeholder1_type x; boost::lambda::placeholder2_type y; std::vector<X> v; boost::function<int(int, int)> my_sum = bind( sum, x, y ); std::accumulate( boost::begin( v ), boost::end( v ), 0, bind( my_sum, x, bind( &X::f, y ) ) ); } Thx - Rob.