2 Dec
2009
2 Dec
'09
8:39 p.m.
AMDG Eric Niebler wrote:
This is arguably a bug in gcc's vector implementation in that it doesn't work property with types that have overloaded unary operator&. It's possible that I might be able to work around the problem in xpressive. Feel free to file a bug against xpressive at svn.boost.org. You should also file a bug against gcc at gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla.
I think gcc is okay. See 20.1.3 table 30 expression - return type - requirement &t - T* - denotes the address of t. In Christ, Steven Watanabe