29 Aug
2009
29 Aug
'09
10:45 a.m.
AMDG Mathias Gaunard wrote:
Steven Watanabe wrote:
I see. I forgot about the default implementation. The problem with this scheme is that if boost is an associated namespace of T, then boost::begin will be ambiguous with boost::range_detail::begin.
A solution could be to have all ranges in the boost namespace overload begin to avoid the ambiguity. Overloading that they already do with the current system.
That isn't enough. std::vector<boost::function<void()> > has boost as an associated namespace e.g.. In Christ, Steven Watanabe