Windows has it built it (I guess it comes from OpenVMS) HANDLE WINAPI CreateMutex( LPSECURITY_ATTRIBUTES lpMutexAttributes, BOOL bInitialOwner, LPCTSTR lpName ); OpenVMS has a small data part on the locks in which a user can store some data. This is another form of IPC. Wish POSIX supported this because at times I would like to know from where the lock came to me or who owns the lock I am trying to acquire. -dhruva On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 7:36 PM, Ion Gaztañaga <igaztanaga@gmail.com> wrote:
Jason Robertson wrote:
Hi, I'm trying to create simple locks based on a string name. I looked at the interprocess module which has a named mutex,but it seems not well suited/efficient for use in a single process, though I know it's supposed to work.
I don't recommend using Interprocess named mutex. It has different lifetime semantics than intra-process named mutexes and it can be less efficient than other mutexes.
I don't know about the Named Mutex pattern, but this pattern seems a bit resource expensive (creating and destroying mutexes on the fly). Wouldn't be better just to store the mutexes in the map without seeing if a client has destroyed it and re-create it again?
Regards,
Ion
Instead, I'm just creating a map<string,weak_ptr<mutex>> in a NamedMutexManager class. It's used as a singleton and uses brute force locking to implement a named lock pattern. Main method is shared_ptr<mutex> GetMutex(string name) { BigLock (only one thread at a time can get a lock so we synchronize access to map) check map if we have entry, make sure weak_ptr hasn't been reclaimed If so, make a new shared_ptr, save weak_ptr by name, return shared_ptr If not, return shared_ptr copy from weak_ptr.lock() If we habe no entry, make a new shared_ptr, save weak_ptr by name, return shared_ptr } I'm just getting back to C++ after years, so I'm 99% sure there's probably a much better way. Is there a better way to do an intra-process, reliable mutex by std::string name so I can lock things by name? How are other people doing this, do you find interprocess:named_mutex suitable for use in-process? I had problems with it. Thanks! Jason
_______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
-- Contents reflect my personal views only!