19 Feb
2013
19 Feb
'13
7:08 p.m.
Hi,
I've been working already on a synchronized_value class that is in trunk [1]. I plan to merge it to release branch as soon as I have finished the tests and the documentation. You can see some examples in [2] and [3].
I've take a look to your class and I think my class provides everything yours provide.
Surely your version has been given more thought.
My class allows in addition to lock several synchronized values using the deadlock free lock algorithm as e.g.
I did not understand the unique_synchronize part, though.
Please could you compare your class to mine and let me know what do you think?
I can't see any flaw right now, but I'm still playing with it. If anything shows up I'll let you know. Thanks !