Re: signature discrepancy between equal_range and upper_bound
From: Nat Linden <nat@lindenlab.com> Reply to: boost-users@lists.boost.org Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 08:58:18 -0500 Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lib.boost.user Followup to: newsgroup References: <jbkr2p$hi$1@dough.gmane.org> On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 5:34 AM, <giecrilj@stegny.2a.pl> wrote:
The algorithm equal_range takes the Value by constant reference while the algorithm upper_bound takes Value by value. Why is that? =A0(Note that standard algorithms take a constant reference.)
Sorry to be obtuse, but... are you talking about a Boost library? If so, which one?
<URL: file:///usr/share/doc/packages/boost-1.44.0/libs/range/doc/html/range/reference/algorithms/non_mutating/upper_bound.html >