8 Mar
2005
8 Mar
'05
11:08 a.m.
"Thorsten Ottosen" <nesotto@cs.auc.dk> wrote
| Weren't you going to have boost::end() find the user's end via ADL?
no, I was going to find user's adl_end() function via ADL. So this changes the extension protocol to overloading adl_end() from overloading end().
Then you are back to pre-namespace techniques :-) I most likely missed it from the discussion, but what's wrong with allowing the user to overload boost::end() for her type? Regards, Arkadiy