10 Dec
2005
10 Dec
'05
8:05 a.m.
David Abrahams wrote:
"Paul Mensonides" <pmenso57@comcast.net> writes:
However, it would be nice to have a clean Boost library in parallel to the hacked to death Boost library (which is what we have now), and challenge implementors to support that.
Great idea! Why don't we add a simple way to make all BOOST_WORKAROUNDs turn off?
I think there already is: #define BOOST_STRICT_CONFIG See boost/detail/workaround.hpp -- Daniel Wallin