Hi folks, [I've posted this to both user and development lists, because I'm not sure which is most appropriate in this case.] I make use of several Boost libraries in my schroot program (svn://svn.debian.org/svn/buildd-tools/trunk/schroot). This project, like many, utilises GNU Autoconf and Automake for its build system. I need to determine how to link with the Boost libraries in order to build the programs in the project. This is an issue for many projects which want to link with a Boost library. To illustrate my problem: ls -l /usr/lib/libboost_regex-*.so /usr/lib/libboost_program_options-*.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 45 2007-07-08 11:48 /usr/lib/libboost_program_options-gcc41-1_34.so -> libboost_program_options-gcc41-1_34.so.1.34.0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 48 2007-07-08 11:48 /usr/lib/libboost_program_options-gcc41-mt-1_34.so -> libboost_program_options-gcc41-mt-1_34.so.1.34.0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 41 2007-07-08 11:48 /usr/lib/libboost_program_options-mt.so -> libboost_program_options-gcc41-mt-1_34.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 38 2007-07-08 11:48 /usr/lib/libboost_program_options-st.so -> libboost_program_options-gcc41-1_34.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 35 2007-07-08 11:47 /usr/lib/libboost_regex-gcc41-1_34.so -> libboost_regex-gcc41-1_34.so.1.34.0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 38 2007-07-08 11:47 /usr/lib/libboost_regex-gcc41-mt-1_34.so -> libboost_regex-gcc41-mt-1_34.so.1.34.0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 31 2007-07-08 11:47 /usr/lib/libboost_regex-mt.so -> libboost_regex-gcc41-mt-1_34.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 28 2007-07-08 11:47 /usr/lib/libboost_regex-st.so -> libboost_regex-gcc41-1_34.so Unlike every other library on my system, the Boost libraries have the compiler (gcc41) and threading model (mt|st) and so on embedded *in the library name*. This makes it impossible to discover in an automatic fashion. Since this is free software anyone can download and build, I don't know what the compiler/toolchain will be, let alone what abbreviation Boost has chosen for it. I expect that Autoconf will set up such things appropriately. The only means I have are the libboost_program_options-mt.so, libboost_program_options-st.so (and so on for all the libraries) symbolic links which the Debian maintainer has helpfully provided. However, these are not portable, and are so not a good solution. They are, however, the only available solution at the moment. To further show the problem I am having, this is part of my configure.ac Autoconf template: ---configure.ac---- AC_CHECK_HEADERS([tr1/memory]) AC_CHECK_HEADERS([boost/shared_ptr.hpp],, [ if test $ac_cv_header_tr1_memory = yes; then : else AC_MSG_ERROR([Boost.shared_ptr (Boost C++ Libraries) is not installed, but is required by schroot]) fi]) AC_CHECK_HEADERS([tr1/tuple]) AC_CHECK_HEADERS([boost/tuple/tuple.hpp],, [ if test $ac_cv_header_tr1_memory = yes; then : else AC_MSG_ERROR([Boost.Tuple (Boost C++ Libraries) is not installed, but is required by schroot]) fi]) AC_CHECK_HEADERS([boost/format.hpp],, [AC_MSG_ERROR([Boost.Format (Boost C++ Libraries) is not installed, but is required by schroot])]) AC_CHECK_HEADERS([boost/program_options.hpp],, [AC_MSG_ERROR([Boost.Program_options (Boost C++ Libraries) is not installed, but is required by schroot])]) AC_CHECK_HEADERS([boost/type_traits.hpp],, [AC_MSG_ERROR([Boost.TypeTraits (Boost C++ Libraries) is not installed, but is required by schroot])]) AC_MSG_CHECKING([for boost::program_options::variables_map in -lboost_program_options-st]) saved_ldflags="${LDFLAGS}" LDFLAGS="${LDFLAGS} -lboost_program_options-st" AC_LINK_IFELSE([AC_LANG_PROGRAM([#include <boost/program_options.hpp>], [boost::program_options::variables_map::variables_map dummy()])], [AC_MSG_RESULT([yes]) BOOST_LIBS="${BOOST_LIBS} -lboost_program_options-st"], [AC_MSG_RESULT([no]) AC_MSG_FAILURE([libboost_program_options (Boost C++ Libraries) is not installed, but is required by schroot])]) LDFLAGS="${saved_ldflags}" AC_MSG_CHECKING([for boost::program_options::options_description::options() in -lboost_program_options-st]) saved_ldflags="${LDFLAGS}" LDFLAGS="${LDFLAGS} -lboost_program_options-st" AC_LINK_IFELSE([AC_LANG_PROGRAM([#include <boost/program_options.hpp>], [boost::program_options::options_description testgrp("test group"); bool notused = testgrp.options().empty(); ])], [AC_MSG_RESULT([yes]) BOOST_PROGRAM_OPTIONS_DESCRIPTION_METHODS="current"], [AC_MSG_RESULT([no]) BOOST_PROGRAM_OPTIONS_DESCRIPTION_METHODS="old"]) LDFLAGS="${saved_ldflags}" AH_TEMPLATE(BOOST_PROGRAM_OPTIONS_DESCRIPTION_OLD, [Set if boost::program_options::options_description::options() is not available]) if test "$BOOST_PROGRAM_OPTIONS_DESCRIPTION_METHODS" = "old"; then AC_DEFINE(BOOST_PROGRAM_OPTIONS_DESCRIPTION_OLD, 1) fi AC_MSG_CHECKING([for boost::regex in -lboost_regex-st]) saved_ldflags="${LDFLAGS}" LDFLAGS="${LDFLAGS} -lboost_regex-st" AC_LINK_IFELSE([AC_LANG_PROGRAM([#include <boost/regex.hpp>], [boost::regex("^foo[bar]$")])], [AC_MSG_RESULT([yes]) BOOST_LIBS="${BOOST_LIBS} -lboost_regex-st"], [AC_MSG_RESULT([no]) AC_MSG_FAILURE([libboost_regex (Boost C++ Libraries) is not installed, but is required by schroot])]) LDFLAGS="${saved_ldflags}" AC_SUBST([BOOST_LIBS]) ---configure.ac---- As you can see, that's quite a bit of complexity. It also includes code to work around a backwards compatibility issue in Boost.Program_options. However, it needs to know the library name in order to link the test code, and I'm still needing to use a non-standard name in order to do that. It would be great if Boost would provide a mechanism to allow such discovery. Such a mechanism already exists, and is called "pkg-config". By installing a small file in LIBDIR/pkgconfig for each Boost library, the pkg-config tool or PKG_CHECK_MODULES Autoconf macro may be used to query this information. As an example: ---- boost-regex-mt.pc ---- prefix=/usr exec_prefix=${prefix} libdir=${exec_prefix}/lib includedir=${prefix}/include Name: boost-regex-mt Description: Boost C++ Regular Expression Library (multi-threaded) Version: 1.34.0 Libs: -L${libdir} -lboost_regex-gcc41-mt-1_34 Libs.private: -licui18n -licuuc -lrt -lm Cflags: -I${includedir} -pthread ---- boost-regex-mt.pc ---- You can generate this from a template: ---- boost-regex-mt.pc.in ---- prefix=PREFIX exec_prefix=EPREFIX libdir=LIBDIR includedir=INCLUDEDIR Name: boost-regex-mt Description: Boost Regular Expression Library (multi-threaded) Version: VERSION Libs: -L${libdir} LIBRARY_NAME Libs.private: LIBRARY_DEPENDENCIES [for static linking] Cflags: -I${includedir} THREAD_OPTIONS_FOR_COMPILER ---- boost-regex-mt.pc.in ---- where the capitalised names are where you would substitute in the system- and compiler-specific options. It looks like bjam could probably make this a single rule all libraries could make use of. For such a setup, all that configure script above could be mostly reduced to PKG_CHECK_MODULES([boost-regex-st]) PKG_CHECK_MODULES([boost-program-options-st]) I don't know how bjam works, but I do this with Autoconf as a file generated by config.status, but it could also be generated by make with a simple sed command. I guess you could do the bjam equivalent, whatever that might be. I have had a look at the sources to try to implement this, but I am afraid I lack the bjam expertise to do it. You may find much more detailed discussion of these issues at http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=424038 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=424666 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=425264 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=428419 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=350539 Some of these are due to Debian-specific issues (a change to the symlink name), but the root cause is the inability to identify the Boost library names in an automated fashion. Regards, Roger -- .''`. Roger Leigh : :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/ `. `' Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/ `- GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848 Please GPG sign your mail.