Thanks! In a sense, I can sympathize with your co-workers. I spent hours trying to get that predicate right - I kept screwing up the 'inner' bind. I keep hoping the more I work with the boost libraries the easier it will get. In my case, that's yet to be seen. ;) Thanks again. Tom Matelich <tmatelich@zetec To: "'Boost-Users@yahoogroups.com'" <Boost-Users@yahoogroups.com> .com> cc: Subject: RE: [Boost-Users] Unary predicate for shared_ptr == 'real' pointe r? 04/11/2003 01:55 PM Please respond to Boost-Users

From: Mark Storer [mailto:mstorer@cardiff.com] Sent: Friday, April 11, 2003 1:51 PM

The whole "new int" thing seems a little odd, but that's an artifact of creating example code.

precisely

What do your co-workers say? I feel like I'm missing something here.

While the elegance of the double bind is appreciated, I've heard complaints about it being confusing. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCLAIMER: Information contained in this message and/or attachment(s) may contain confidential information of Zetec, Inc. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender by return email. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Info: <http://www.boost.org> Wiki: <http://www.crystalclearsoftware.com/cgi-bin/boost_wiki/wiki.pl> Unsubscribe: <mailto:boost-users-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/