Hello, Does boost provide a thread safe stack class implementation? Thanks /Ramesh
It doesn't, I think. -- Alp Mestan --- http://blog.mestan.fr/ --- http://alp.developpez.com/ --- In charge of the Qt, Algorithms and Artificial Intelligence sections on Developpez
On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 9:17 AM, Ramesh <rramesh1@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
Does boost provide a thread safe stack class implementation?
No. If you are on x86/x64 VC++ 2008, I have a lock-free stack and queue here: http://svn.int64.org/svnroot/int64/snips/lockfree/ Caveat, 64-bit path doesn't yet work on pre-dual core Athlon 64s... working on that. -- Cory Nelson
Does boost provide a thread safe stack class implementation?
No. If you are on x86/x64 VC++ 2008, I have a lock-free stack and queue here:
http://svn.int64.org/svnroot/int64/snips/lockfree/
Caveat, 64-bit path doesn't yet work on pre-dual core Athlon 64s... working on that.
i have some boost-style implementations of a lock-free stack: http://tim.klingt.org/git?p=boost_lockfree.git;a=summary it should support x86/x86_64 on gcc/m$vc with blocking fallback code for other architectures/compilers ... best, tim -- tim@klingt.org http://tim.klingt.org Just what the hell is the experimental tradition? Morton Feldman
participants (4)
-
Alp Mestan -
Cory Nelson -
Ramesh -
Tim Blechmann