November 2004 - Boost - lists.boost.org

C++/Tcl
by Maciej Sobczak 23 Nov '04

23 Nov '04

Hi, I have just released the 1.0.0 version of my library for integration between C++ and Tcl scripting language: http://cpptcl.sourceforge.net/ This library may be of some interest to Boosters, since: - it was inspired by Boost.Python and shamelessy mimicks its syntax ;) - there are people working on Boost.Langbinding that may find C++/Tcl concepts more or less interesting (I do not see my posts in their maillist archive) - it uses some of Boost - it itself has high ACBR ("angle/curly brackets ratio") Your comments are welcome, -- Maciej Sobczak : http://www.msobczak.com/ Programming : http://www.msobczak.com/prog/

1 0

[serialization] Compiler warnings: 1.32 release
by Jody Hagins 23 Nov '04

23 Nov '04

Many, many warnings of the following type (g++ 3.2)... /home/jody/boost_1_32_0/libs/serialization/src/basic_iarchive.cpp: In member function `bool boost::archive::detail::basic_iarchive_impl::track(boost::archive::deta il::basic_iarchive&, void*&)': /home/jody/boost_1_32_0/libs/serialization/src/basic_iarchive.cpp:291: warning: choosing `boost::archive::object_id_type::operator unsigned int&()' over ` boost::archive::object_id_type::operator unsigned int() const' /home/jody/boost_1_32_0/libs/serialization/src/basic_iarchive.cpp:291: warning: for conversion from `boost::archive::object_id_type' to `unsigned int' /home/jody/boost_1_32_0/libs/serialization/src/basic_iarchive.cpp:291: warning: because conversion sequence for the argument is better /home/jody/boost_1_32_0/libs/serialization/src/basic_iarchive.cpp: In member function `void boost::archive::detail::basic_iarchive_impl::load_object(boost::archive ::detail::basic_iarchive&, void*, const boost::archive::detail::basic_iserializer&)':

3 5

[Boost-bugs] [ boost-Support Requests-1071409 ] Add Boost folder to VS directory list
by SourceForge.net 23 Nov '04

23 Nov '04

Support Requests item #1071409, was opened at 2004-11-22 18:13 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=207586&aid=1071409&group_… Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Add Boost folder to VS directory list Initial Comment: Dear Mr/s, I'm doing a program in C#, visual Studio.net environment. I need to generate random numbers, not just from the system class, but others like mersenne twister, fobinacci etc. The Boost library has a set of random number generators in C++, so I downloaded the "boost" from boost.org page. My program in C# has a wrapper to use the generators from the boost folder, the "reference" (boost) and the corresponding "using boost". My problem is how to add the "boost" folder to the list of include directories in VS so that the "reference" in my C# project can find it. If you know how, could you please indicate me the steps. Thanks for attention Sergio Almonacid Oregon State University almonacs(a)onid.orst.edu ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=207586&aid=1071409&group_… ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ _______________________________________________ Boost-bugs mailing list Boost-bugs(a)lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/boost-bugs

1 0

Re: RE: [boost] Another logo proposal
by JOAQUIN LOPEZ MU?Z 23 Nov '04

23 Nov '04

----- Mensaje original ----- De: Robert Geiman <rgeiman(a)buckeye-express.com> Fecha: Martes, Noviembre 23, 2004 0:55 am Asunto: Re: RE: [boost] Another logo proposal > ---- Original Message ---- > From: joaquin(a)tid.es > To: boost(a)lists.boost.org > Subject: Re: RE: [boost] Another logo proposal > Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 00:19:53 +0100 > > >I think this is what you've got in mind. > >Myself, I don't like it much. Not so compact, and > >the "C++" thing becomes too obvious. But well, this > >is just my opinion, of course. > > Close, but not quite what I was thinking. The version you created > goes below this bottom of the first +, which as you said makes it > less compact. > > Take that bottom C part and puch it up one "block", making sure you > keep the + sign on top of the background. In essence, you'd really > just be adding a single block of background in the lower left gap of > the first +, and another block to the lower right gap of the first +, > if that makes any sense. > Like this? Joaquín M López Muñoz Telefónica, Investigación y Desarrollo

1 0

[Spirit] What changed in spirit 1.8.1?
by Marcin Kalicinski 23 Nov '04

23 Nov '04

How can I find out what changed from 1.8.0 to 1.8.1 in Spirit? I could not find any changelog in the docs. Best regards, Marcin

2 1

Re: RE: [boost] Another logo proposal
by Robert Geiman 23 Nov '04

23 Nov '04

---- Original Message ---- From: joaquin(a)tid.es To: boost(a)lists.boost.org Subject: Re: RE: [boost] Another logo proposal Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 00:19:53 +0100 > > >> Yes, I like the simplicity a lot. However, I'd also make a slight >> change to the background of the ++. Could you remove the lower >right >> background of the ++, and instead mirror the upper left background >> vertically. That is, the background would appear in the upper and >> lower left area of the ++. >> >> To me this would look better as the background would look like the >> letter C, which would go nicely with the ++. >> > >I think this is what you've got in mind. >Myself, I don't like it much. Not so compact, and >the "C++" thing becomes too obvious. But well, this >is just my opinion, of course. Close, but not quite what I was thinking. The version you created goes below this bottom of the first +, which as you said makes it less compact. Take that bottom C part and puch it up one "block", making sure you keep the + sign on top of the background. In essence, you'd really just be adding a single block of background in the lower left gap of the first +, and another block to the lower right gap of the first +, if that makes any sense. - Robert Geiman

1 0

Re: [boost] Re: Another logo proposal
by JOAQUIN LOPEZ MU?Z 23 Nov '04

23 Nov '04

----- Mensaje original ----- De: Daniel Frey <d.frey(a)gmx.de> Fecha: Lunes, Noviembre 22, 2004 11:43 pm Asunto: [boost] Re: Another logo proposal > JOAQUIN LOPEZ MU?Z wrote: > > You mean, like the version attached? > > I don't know, it kind of looks too irregularly shaped. Not > > so blocky as the other designs. > > Hm, no offense intended, but this logo seems more appropriate for > a > mortician. YMMV. :) > LOL :) What do you make of this, then? http://tinyurl.com/59y5z Best, Joaquín M López Muñoz Telefónica, Investigación y Desarrollo

2 1

Re: RE: [boost] Another logo proposal
by JOAQUIN LOPEZ MU?Z 23 Nov '04

23 Nov '04

----- Mensaje original ----- De: Robert Geiman <rgeiman(a)buckeye-express.com> Fecha: Lunes, Noviembre 22, 2004 11:49 pm Asunto: RE: [boost] Another logo proposal > Yes, I like the simplicity a lot. However, I'd also make a slight > change to the background of the ++. Could you remove the lower right > background of the ++, and instead mirror the upper left background > vertically. That is, the background would appear in the upper and > lower left area of the ++. > > To me this would look better as the background would look like the > letter C, which would go nicely with the ++. > I think this is what you've got in mind. Myself, I don't like it much. Not so compact, and the "C++" thing becomes too obvious. But well, this is just my opinion, of course. Joaquín M López Muñoz Telefónica, Investigación y Desarrollo

1 0

Re: [boost] Re: Another logo proposal
by JOAQUIN LOPEZ MU?Z 23 Nov '04

23 Nov '04

Hi Rich ----- Mensaje original ----- De: Rich Johnson <rjohnson(a)dogstar-interactive.com> Fecha: Lunes, Noviembre 22, 2004 8:57 pm Asunto: Re: [boost] Re: Another logo proposal > > I like the stair-step imagery of the second .png- (the one with no > backing field) > It's a nice play on the use of building blocks. I think it still > carries a blocky, solid/stable feel. > > Is there a single color restriction for ease of printing? If not > adding a third '+' in a different color (or perhaps in outline) > would > further emphasize building on C++. You mean, like the version attached? I don't know, it kind of looks too irregularly shaped. Not so blocky as the other designs. Joaquín M López Muñoz Telefónica, Investigación y Desarrollo

3 2

boost.thread : Can one create a thread with an object member function?
by Tim Laplaca 22 Nov '04

22 Nov '04

I am very new to boost, I apologize if this has been asked before. I searched the mailing list archive but could not find an answer to my question. I was successful creating threads with functions that are not members of objects, but when I try to create threads with a pointer to an object member I get compilation errors (MS Visual Studio .NET). Examples: class objclass; typedef void (objclass::*pmf)(); // ptr to member func class objclass { public: objclass() : thread_id (0) { p=&objclass::dowork; } inline setthreadid(int x) {thread_id = x;} inline setvaltwo(std::string str) {valtwo = str;} void dowork(); pmf p; // pointer to dowork member function int getthreadid() {return thread_id;} std::string getvaltwo() {return valtwo;} private: int thread_id; std::string valtwo; }; void objclass::dowork() { } (In the main...) boost::thread_group thrds; objclass * objthread; objthread = new objclass; thrds.create_thread( (objthread->p) ); I get the following error: c:\Boost\include\boost-1_31\boost\function\function_template.hpp(427): error C2664: 'void boost::function0<R>::assign_to<Functor>(FunctionPtr,boost::detail::funct ion::function_ptr_tag)' : cannot convert parameter 2 from 'boost::detail::function::member_ptr_tag' to 'boost::detail::function::function_ptr_tag' with [ R=void, Functor=pmf, FunctionPtr=pmf ] Is there a way around this problem, or is it simply not possible to make threads from object members with boost? Thanks, Tim

3 2