December 2004 - Boost - lists.boost.org

Program Options Custom Notifier Function Order of Execution
by Tony Han Bao 07 Dec '04

07 Dec '04

Hi all, Can anyone tell me the precise definition or behaviour of the order of execution of the user supplied functions to handle command line options defined in boost program options library. For example, my option menu was defined as follows boost::program_options::options_description menu("Valid Options"); menu.add_options() ("help,h", "Display this menu.") ("time,t", boost::program_options::value<double>(&time_arg_value) -> notifier(&my_function1) "Description of option") ("memory,m", boost::program_options::value<double>(&memory_arg_value) -> notifier(&my_function2), "Description of option") ("file,f", boost::program_options::value<std::vector<std::string> >(&file_arg_value) -> composing() -> notifier(&file_arg_handler<std::vector<std::string> >), "Something"); boost::program_options::variables_map menu_map; boost::program_options::store(boost::program_options:: parse_command_line(argc, argv, menu), menu_map); boost::program_options::notify(menu_map); Question is: Will the following two calls to the program result in different behaviour? >./Test --time 76 --memory 97 --help >./Test --memory 97 --time 76 --help I want my two functions for time and memory be independent of each other but I would like the function be called in the same order as the options specified on the command line. Sure I can test but can someone guarantee that what I discovered will remain valid in the future release of the library. Another question: What will happen if this program was called on the command line with the following options. >./Test --file myfile1 --time 87 --file myfile2 Will the file_arg_handler be called first with composed arguments and then time function (my_function1) or will the time function (my_function1) be called first and then the file_arg_handler function. Can I count on it that what happens will always happen in the future? Is there definitions for the order of execution guarantee by the library? Thanks in advance for your help! Best Regards, Tony Han Bao tonybao(a)mac.com

3 8

[named_params] member function overload autogen macro
by Cromwell Enage 07 Dec '04

07 Dec '04

It turns out that class member function definitions that take in named parameters will not compile with BOOST_NAMED_PARAMS_FUN. The first two lines of this macro, meant to generate the function prototype so that free function overloads can call it, cause a "duplicate definition" error when the macro is used in a class body. Fortunately, removing those two lines to create the BOOST_NAMED_PARAMS_MEMBER_FUN macro was all that was needed to eliminate the error. Sooo...here's yet another patch, along with a two-file program illustrating both macros in action. Cromwell D. Enage P.S. I better start adding my middle initial, to match with the name I use in my licensing info. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail

1 0

no auto-link for serialization
by Martin Slater 07 Dec '04

07 Dec '04

Posted before but being a lemon I put filesystem in the subject instead of serialisation, please see No auto-link for filesystem message from yesterday. sorry Martin

2 1

No auto-link for filesystem
by Martin Slater 07 Dec '04

07 Dec '04

Is there a reason for this or is it just an oversight? cheers Martin

2 3

[BUG] Missing method in gregorian::greg_year
by Joel Reed 07 Dec '04

07 Dec '04

the class gregorian::greg_year in the date_time library is missing a method implemented in greg_day and greg_month. the method is: unsigned short as_number() const {return value_;} i checked cvs, on 12/6/04, to confirm this is still an issue. http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/boost/boost/boost/date_time/gregorian… we have been very impressed with this library and wanted to report this minor inconsistency as a small, small way to say thanks. jr -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Joel W. Reed 412-257-3881 ---------- http://home.comcast.net/~joelwreed/ ----------

2 1

Boost Sandbox layout?
by Rene Rivera 07 Dec '04

07 Dec '04

I'm looking at how things are placed in the sandbox and wondering about something... Currently the sandbox mirrors the layout of the main Boost CVS. That is: boost-sandbox /boost/... /libs /libs/<library>/... That layout has a few drawbacks when dealing with a single isolated library... 1) It makes it harder to package as one has to filter out the rest of the stuff there. 2) One can get conflicts when something in another library's code gets accidentally used. I ran into this when evaluating named_params as some MPL related files got picked off from the sandbox instead of from the Boost CVS. 3) Makes finding things much harder when someone mentions to look in the sandbox for their library. Was there ever a discussion as to the layout? (A cursory search did not reveal anything) -- -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com -- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com - 102708583/icq

3 8

Bug: thread_exception returns ref to local variable
by Ulrich Eckhardt 06 Dec '04

06 Dec '04

Cheers! The code in question is this: // boost/thread/exceptions.hpp class thread_exception { ... const char* message() const; }; // libs/thread/src/exceptions.cpp std::string system_message(int sys_err_code){..} const char* thread_exception::message() const { if (m_sys_err != 0) return system_message(m_sys_err).c_str(); return what(); } If message() is called and m_sys_err is set, it will return a pointer to storage of a temporary, which is bad, as we all know. I did some research on that, and I think this whole method can be removed completely because: - it is not decumented - it is not used - it never worked (probably, at least not with 1.32) Further, one could then remove <string> from the includes in the header and some more includes in the sourcefile. An alternative approach would be to change the returntype to std::string, of course, or (and I think that's an interesting alternative!) derive all those classes from std::runtime_error, which can hold a std::string natively. Uli

1 0

wiki spam
by Max Khesin 06 Dec '04

06 Dec '04

The CAPTCHA technology might be helpful: http://weblog.infoworld.com/udell/2004/12/01.html#a1124 There are apparently open-source implementations of CAPTCHA, might be something to consider. Another suggestion would be boost-specific CAPTCHA that asks you to enter a result of some enable_if statement as the answer to the question - guaranteed to stop spammers AND newbies! (an unexpected benefit?) regards, max This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.

1 0

Novelty: autmatically assigning unique integral type ids
by Jonathan Turkanis 06 Dec '04

06 Dec '04

Hi all, Attached is some non-conforming code which automatically assigns a unique integer id to an arbitrary type. It's based on this post by Daniel Wallin: http://lists.boost.org/MailArchives/boost/msg69842.php Example: #include <boost/static_assert.hpp> #include <boost/unique_id.hpp> int main() { BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT(BOOST_UNIQUE_ID(void) == 0); BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT(BOOST_UNIQUE_ID(bool) == 1); BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT(BOOST_UNIQUE_ID(char) == 2); BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT(BOOST_UNIQUE_ID(void) == 0); BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT(BOOST_UNIQUE_ID(bool) == 1); BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT(BOOST_UNIQUE_ID(char) == 2); } Obviously the ids assigned will be different depending on the order in which types are passed to BOOST_UNIQUE_ID. It's a novelty not just because it's non-conforming but also because after assigning ids to about fifty types it slows down to a deadly crawl, and maxes out at about 110 types (on VC7.1, using over 300MB RAM). I tried several forms of loop unrolling, and they don't help much. I'm posting this now because yesterday I figured out how to make it work on EDG (except for Comeau). It now works on VC7.1, VC8.0 (beta), GCC 3.2 (MinGW), GCC 3.4.1 (Cygwin), Intel 7.0 and 8.0 for Windows (in strict mode), and on the preview of the Borland EDG-based compiler I downloaded about half a year ago. I still need conforming-compiler workarounds for Comeau and Metrowerks. ;-) Best Regards, Jonathan begin 666 unique_id.zip M4$L#! H``````'%R@S$````````````````/````;&EB<R]U;FEQ=65?:60O M4$L#!!0````(`!AP@S&5>-46[ ```+(&```7````;&EB<R]U;FEQ=65?:60O M=&5S="YC<'#MTT]/PC 8!O![DWZ')ERV"SB4?T%,4#GL`M&-<U/6RIJ4%M?6 MB_&[.SM%PHEW5^AQW2_/F_1Y.U(7RG-![C?&6->SCCE94&:MJ%RWW.\?,.J< M_..U?/>"2OY[CY'4CNR8U%&,T2=&I#Z/JU66TRR?Y^D3G6?9XC6/FF_K9?JR M7M#T.?HPDL=D-B,W\?1\50^A@DH@JBA9%50?HJS<:L')`=]"L->G_ Z479K* M!39HE?KOAQ!?OV5 HU:A?WH,T<KH;5"35ID'GH!Z]*8,:X9-0$WBQF^4:""H M3#]SDF,-:M-U6:[+<O'+\H71-U!+`P0*``````"<<H,Q```````````````` M!0```&QI8G,O4$L#!!0````(`$-O@S'*X)&D;@,``*,+```3````8F]O<W0O M=6YI<75E7VED+FAP<*5638^;,!"]K[3_8:1>8)M"4O7D4J0V&ZFI*K95V%XM M+PR)56*H,=VF5?][;2"$+!\;J3XA_&;FS;-G/*X+UM*&998?)-_N%'S*!%,[ M)B LY7<F> &OY_,WSO65Z\(M+Y3D#Z7"&$H1HP2U0_B0986"39:H1R81/O,( M18$S^(:RX)F A3-WP-H@`HNB;)\S<>!B6SE,>*H-ULM5L%G1!9T[ZI>"3$*D MZ0!3L%,J)Z[[^/CH/)@H3B:W[A.\8U]?'=E%*>-[E 2"3 %KF*7\03)Y< SL M!4\T[P0^W-UM0GH?K+_>K^CZEG[\\H6N@^7G^]O5K49I"!?X#,IX$U%:Q@A> MQ<Z-,I'PK;/+<[^_N<]3%W^RE/)D`L%C%(JKPQ1$J(G=G'$YLJT..5(E&5>% M&Z-B/'4/6%"14;-S@1$OZ,^,QR/(4O%4,W=1L(<43VF.ZFF%-A!2&1-2"OZC MU%:Q!R'XA)BXA&B]2C0N!-MCD;,(H<+#G_.?=3KF+_37]95"+0U3Z!FOQ@I" MMM74.LD1TN(a)`+1.ZPS1':6GL#!S'L=^:H .^M"==&&6D.K9<HXY\!L//0!\D M!'X-:>WW3'[7Y=7)I%9M$[X/UTNZO OT5Q!:1H=T!I5 \.X\[X+_QBRQAA*Q M[!E8F(a)TA.CKU`O_&GMMV7[9WPRZ'!+/!"',$FC^FPJH8AB/U*HY^M=,`_U9* M5O">-/<S:+^?J"/PEZ)#$AV#'@W[^51TFO+S!F])J[UWDF?NSR!H;J$_&S:K MT4W9CKAN<:8Z)S MKCZ<)C+<P.NQZ'VKN3^.'-F:3&U:-+,&A%M<()Q9EXK7 M8B\0L,7V1(27L'A.R'/KQ8289DUI?7':IJ>.G4S_=],;06)1IFJ@\OZK")H6 M[]7>QW(X*T3/E.R X$;LZ:O5*M!$&T]VN'<\2?@IK;!+:^ZWSLZEZWFI=PE) MN-0/S?CJ<!KU4:">">()'VS[]MCBF.*1GGR$#FI>AJ:S0^<AG.B:]7M6.ZIZ M98QZ&))($\E1##9+$Z23@UD-^*S+FQ&ADNT$&WXA3UI;-?=7AE5#W79U#[NQ MGS_#<]Z>%J@]MK/%M4Y,WQZF,JF]U1[_@IX#5SH#XRHO3I.!<_G+7?,BG71J M%YT1I7K<O= _-KC:Y \,D*C&DZ(>6NH)5&?%$P.Y;!:]OOH'4$L#! H````` M`)ER@S$````````````````&````8F]O<W0O4$L!`A0`"@``````<7*#,0`` M``````````````\````````````0`````````&QI8G,O=6YI<75E7VED+U!+ M`0(4`!0````(`!AP@S&5>-46[ ```+(&```7``````````$`( ```"T```!L M:6)S+W5N:7%U95]I9"]T97-T+F-P<%!+`0(4``H``````)QR@S$````````` M```````%````````````$ ```$X!``!L:6)S+U!+`0(4`!0````(`$-O@S'* MX)&D;@,``*,+```3``````````$`( ```'$!``!B;V]S="]U;FEQ=65?:60N M:'!P4$L!`A0`"@``````F7*#,0````````````````8````````````0```` @$ 4``&)O;W-T+U!+!08`````!0`%`"H!```T!0`````` ` end

5 11

[thread] SunPRO: test_mutex hangs when run via regression.py
by Caleb Epstein 06 Dec '04

06 Dec '04

The Boost.Threads test program test_mutex, when built with the SunPRO C++ compiler, always hangs when I run it on a Solaris machine under regression.py. The same binary finishes in short order with status 0 when run on the command line, but under regression.py it never exits. If I attach to it with the debugger, or with strace or truss, it finishes successfully. I'm unclear what could be going wrong here and expect it is either a bug in the code produced by SunPRO or a really subtle bug in the test program. Perhaps someone could take a look? I am stumped. Here's the output of a program I found called "thrstack" which produces a stack trace for each thread w/o attaching to it: status for pid 13551 (6 LWPs) -- LWP 1 -- ff19f48c: libc.so.1:__lwp_sema_wait + 0x8 ff2396dc: libthread.so.1:_park + 0x114 ff2393a4: libthread.so.1:_swtch + 0x424 ff23da10: libthread.so.1:_reap_wait_cancel + 0x40 ff23fc9c: libthread.so.1:_thrp_join + 0x344 ff33d0d8: libboost_thread-sw-mt-d-1_32.so:void boost::thread::join() + 0x18 000334a4: test_mutex:void __unnamed_lpburfiEtB2zM::indirect_adapter<void(*)()>::operator()()const + 0x44 000333b4: test_mutex:boost::detail::function::unusable boost::detail::function::void_function_obj_invoker0<__unnamed_lpburfiEtB2zM::indirect_adapter<void(*)()>,void>::invoke(boost::detail::function::any_pointer) + 0x1c ff330748: libboost_thread-sw-mt-d-1_32.so:void boost::function0<void,int>::operator()()const + 0x78 ff33cd4c: libboost_thread-sw-mt-d-1_32.so:thread_proxy + 0x44 ff24b01c: libthread.so.1:_thread_start + 0x40 ff33cd08: libboost_thread-sw-mt-d-1_32.so:thread_proxy + 0x0 -- LWP 2 -- ff19eddc: libc.so.1:__signotifywait + 0x4 ff23e950: libthread.so.1:_dynamiclwps + 0x1c ff241c2c: libthread.so.1:_thr_yield + 0x8c -- LWP 3 -- ff19f48c: libc.so.1:__lwp_sema_wait + 0x8 ff2396dc: libthread.so.1:_park + 0x114 ff2393a4: libthread.so.1:_swtch + 0x424 ff23ada0: libthread.so.1:_mutex_adaptive_lock + 0x160 ff23aab4: libthread.so.1:_cmutex_lock + 0x84 ff141cd0: libc.so.1:malloc + 0x18 ff136174: libc.so.1:calloc + 0x54 ff243e2c: libthread.so.1:_thr_setspecific + 0x38 ff2e54bc: libCrun.so.1:__Cimpl::ex_thread*__Cimpl::ex_thread::get_thr_data() + 0x118 ff2e4160: libCrun.so.1:__Cimpl::xstack*&__Cimpl::get_cur_xptr() + 0x4 ff2e41b0: libCrun.so.1:void*__Crun::ex_alloc(unsigned) + 0x14 0007c338: test_mutex:int boost::detail::catch_signals(boost::execution_monitor&,bool,int) + 0x310 0007ac38: test_mutex:int boost::execution_monitor::execute(bool,int) + 0x28 00076e40: test_mutex:boost::unit_test::ut_detail::unit_test_monitor::error_level boost::unit_test::ut_detail::unit_test_monitor::execute_and_translate(boost::unit_test::test_case*,void(boost::unit_test::test_case::*)(),int) + 0x60 0005c1b0: test_mutex:void boost::unit_test::test_case::run() + 0x498 0005cbc4: test_mutex:void boost::unit_test::test_suite::do_run() + 0x7c 0005c3e0: test_mutex:void boost::unit_test::test_case::run() + 0x6c8 00062208: test_mutex:main + 0x458 0002cbb0: test_mutex:_start + 0x108 -- LWP 4 -- ff19f48c: libc.so.1:__lwp_sema_wait + 0x8 ff2396dc: libthread.so.1:_park + 0x114 ff2393a4: libthread.so.1:_swtch + 0x424 ff23ada0: libthread.so.1:_mutex_adaptive_lock + 0x160 ff23aab4: libthread.so.1:_cmutex_lock + 0x84 ff142b64: libc.so.1:free + 0x18 ff2e6260: libCrun.so.1:void operator delete(void*) + 0x4 00031c24: test_mutex:__SLIP.DELETER__H + 0x2c 00031ba0: test_mutex:void boost::detail::sp_counted_base::destruct() + 0x40 00030a5c: test_mutex:void boost::detail::sp_counted_base::weak_release() + 0x6c 0002f9cc: test_mutex:void boost::detail::sp_counted_base::release() + 0x8c 0002f6ec: test_mutex:boost::detail::shared_count::~shared_count #Nvariant 1() + 0x24 0002ef58: test_mutex:boost::shared_ptr<boost::basic_wrap_stringstream<char> >::~shared_ptr() + 0x10 0002e540: test_mutex:boost::test_tools::extended_predicate_value::~extended_predicate_value() + 0x10 0002e2dc: test_mutex:bool boost::test_tools::tt_detail::equal_and_continue_impl<int,int>(const __type_0&,const __type_1&,boost::basic_wrap_stringstream<char>&,boost::unit_test::basic_cstring<const char>,unsigned,boost::unit_test::log_level,unsigned) + 0x37c 0002d6ac: test_mutex:boost::xtime __unnamed_lpburfiEtB2zM::delay(int,int,int) + 0x10c 0002d110: test_mutex:bool __unnamed_lpburfiEtB2zM::execution_monitor::wait() + 0x20 ff25c000: libthread.so.1:?? + 0x0 -- LWP 5 -- ff2491fc: libthread.so.1:private___lwp_cond_wait + 0x4 ff238998: libthread.so.1:_co_timerset + 0xa0 ff24b01c: libthread.so.1:_thread_start + 0x40 ff2388f8: libthread.so.1:_co_timerset + 0x0 -- LWP 6 -- ff19c980: libc.so.1:__door_return + 0xc ff2467c8: libthread.so.1:_sc_door_func + 0x54 ff23a358: libthread.so.1:_lwp_start + 0x18 ff241c2c: libthread.so.1:_thr_yield + 0x8c -- Caleb Epstein caleb dot epstein at gmail dot com

1 0