July 2004 - Boost - lists.boost.org

boost::posix_time::ptime constructor from special values? ( eg, not_a_date_time )
by Richard Reitmeyer 09 Jul '04

09 Jul '04

Hello. Thanks for all your work in the boost::date_time code. It's very useful. I've got a question about constructing a ptime from special values. The documentation says it works, but I can't find the appropriate constructor in ptime.hpp. (I'm using 1.31.0.) Is this a bug, or am I missing something? Richard

2 1

Partially specializing less<> with nested template class
by David B. Held 09 Jul '04

09 Jul '04

This is what I would like to do: template <class P1, class P2> struct sp { template <typename T> struct nested { }; }; template <typename T> struct less; template <class P1, class P2, typename T> struct less<sp<P1, P2>::nested<T> > : binary_function<...> { bool operator()(...); }; However, it doesn't work. From my research, it seems that the problem is that T is in a non-deduced context, but I don't see why that would be an issue, since this is how I expect it to get instantiated: less<sp<p1, p2>::nested<int> > comp; Thus, I don't see any deduction as being necessary, but obviously I don't exactly understand how to get what I want. Dave

4 16

[regression] XSLT reports...
by Rene Rivera 09 Jul '04

09 Jul '04

For the regression reports that are generated with XSLT there is a rather annoying setting the master.css style sheet used for them. For some of the styles, legend, comment, and header-table, a fixed width attribute is used. If the width was small it would not be a problem. But the width is set to 800px. Which means that most people will end up scrolling left and right to see the complete content. If someone would nice enough to change these to a relative value, like 80%, it would be much appreciated. I'd do it myself, but I don't know if me changing the master.css in CVS has any effect on the test machines. -- -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com -- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com - 102708583/icq

2 2

[ref] small problem with docs
by Jonathan Turkanis 09 Jul '04

09 Jul '04

The synopsis for unwrap_reference, at http://www.boost.org/doc/html/class.boost.unwrap_reference.html, is as follows: template<typename T> class unwrap_reference { public: // types typedef unspecified T; }; The second to last line should be 'typedef unspecified type;' Jonathan

3 2

RE: [boost] Re: VC7.1 Building...
by Brian Carlson 09 Jul '04

09 Jul '04

>>If you want to build for vc7.1 you should use vc7.1. > > I did (bjam -sTOOLS=vc7.1 stage) and I get the following error: > > Vc7.1-tools.jam No such file or directory. ^ It's case sensitive. I did a search of the boost directory, and only a vc7-tools.jam, no vc7.1-tools.jam. I think that there is no jam file for vc7.1 in boost 1.29

2 1

RE: [boost] min, max, GCC 2.95.3, and STLport
by Rozental, Gennadiy 09 Jul '04

09 Jul '04

Why subject configuration still failing on min/max according to Linux regression? Gennadiy.

3 2

Patch for Boost.Threads
by Synge Todo 09 Jul '04

09 Jul '04

Dear Boosters, I found that the recent changes made on libs/thread/src/exceptions.cpp break the SGI MIPSpro compiler. Could somebody apply the following patch? Thank you in advance. Best regards, Synge Todo diff -crN boost.orig/libs/thread/src/exceptions.cpp boost/libs/thread/src/exceptions.cpp *** boost.orig/libs/thread/src/exceptions.cpp Wed Jul 7 02:20:55 2004 --- boost/libs/thread/src/exceptions.cpp Thu Jul 8 20:15:19 2004 *************** *** 12,17 **** --- 12,18 ---- #include <boost/thread/detail/config.hpp> #include <boost/thread/exceptions.hpp> + #include <cstring> #include <string> # ifdef BOOST_NO_STDC_NAMESPACE

2 2

RE: [boost] min, max, GCC 2.95.3, and STLport
by Rozental, Gennadiy 09 Jul '04

09 Jul '04

> Are there any other failures regarding min/max you've noticed, or is it just the three tests I've mentioned? As far as I see everything still failing: See here http://tinyurl.com/yq9rw Gennadiy.

2 1

BOOST on Integrity RTOS
by Gaetano Mendola 08 Jul '04

08 Jul '04

Hi all, anyone know if the boost library is available for Green Hills C++ compiler ? I need to port an application that use the boost library on a Integrity RTOS ( that use that compiler ). Regards Gaetano Mendola

1 0

RE:RE: RE: [boost] Does anyone have an is_virtual_base_and_derived ?
by Robert Ramey 08 Jul '04

08 Jul '04

I'm beginning to see that now. In my test case the situation has been much confused by the fact that b1 has/didn't have a virtual destructor which in turn makes it possible/impossible. Oh and running on different compilers in debug/release mode changed behavior as well which left me totally confused. So I'm working through my confusion. >> > I wrote that very thing a year or so ago for the purpose of >> testing if a >> > base pointer type can be statically downcast to a derived type. >> >> My problem exactly ! >I should warn you that this isn't quite enough information to test for >static downcastability in all cases. Take the following example: >struct b1 {}; >struct b2 : b1 {}; >struct b3 : virtual b2 {}; >Here, b1 is not a virtual base of b3, but a downcast from b1* to b3* is >still impossible. I don't believe there is any way to test for this case >without compiler assistance. Robert Ramey

1 0