January 2005 - Boost - lists.boost.org

building boost 1.32 library under vc7.1 with _fastcall
by Alex Baskakov 13 Jan '05

13 Jan '05

How are you, boost? I'm using /Gr option in my project under vc7.1 (the __fastcall calling convention for all functions except C++ member functions and functions marked __cdecl or __stdcall) And I'm trying to build boost with /Gr option but there are some troubles, for example, with Boost.Test library (it define 'main' function without __cdecl) So, what is the right way to do that? Is it possible to use boost in another calling vc7.1 conventions? Bye.

2 1

build with specific python exec
by Neal Becker 13 Jan '05

13 Jan '05

I want to build using a python installed as "python24". How can I do this?

6 11

shared_ptr to self while in constructor
by Dave 13 Jan '05

13 Jan '05

Hello all, A direct call to shared_from_this() does not work in a constructor. Is there any way that I may obtain a shared_ptr to myself while under construction? Thanks, Dave

4 3

questions re the Vault
by Robert Ramey 13 Jan '05

13 Jan '05

I can't remember where the new vault is. I was hoping I could get to it from the main boost page www.boost.org . Could this be updated? I guess there's no simple way to move the stuff in the old vault into the new vault. I would really like to save that "old stuff". I just know I'll need that numeric to roman numeral converter as soon as its deleted. Robert Ramey

4 9

uBLAS regressions/unsupported compilers
by Aleksey Gurtovoy 13 Jan '05

13 Jan '05

Folks, If all the compilers that currently show up as uBLAS regressions on http://www.meta-comm.com/engineering/boost-regression/developer/summary.html are indeed not supported, could somebody please mark them up correspondingly in "status/explicit-failures-markup.xml" (http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/boost/boost/status/explicit-failures-…) ? Thanks! -- Aleksey Gurtovoy MetaCommunications Engineering

3 5

'configure' problem on Solaris 9 - patch enclosed
by Timo Geusch 13 Jan '05

13 Jan '05

I'm still playing about, trying to get boost to compile on my Solaris 9 box with the 5.5 SUN compiler. As there is no compiler configuration yet for the 5.5 compiler I tried to run 'configure' in libs/config/tools to generate a user.hpp file. Unfortunately the installed configure assumes that 'tr' knows how to handle character classes. The one on the Solaris 9 box I've got at work doesn't, so trying to use configure to create a user/compiler specific configuration does produce no meaningful output as all the tests fail. The attached patch to boost_1_32_0/libs/config/tools/configure.in fixes that problem for the price of dumbing down the tr invocation. A 'configure' patched along the same lines (the box doesn't have autoconf installed) produced the desired output which will hopefully allow me to get a bit further building boost on the 5.5 compiler. Regards, Timo

3 4

Help me! Where is the file "libboost_regex-vc6-mt-sgd-1_32.lib"?
by 海洋 13 Jan '05

13 Jan '05

I am using Windows XP + VC6. My compiler complained about "LINK : fatal error LNK1104: cannot open file "libboost_regex-vc6-mt-sgd-1_32.lib" when using "Debug Multithreaded" run-time library! I alos got a similar error with "Multithreaded" run-time library, but OK with other types of run-time librares. What is the matter? plase help me. Thank you very much!!

2 1

Re: Patterns (was Singleton)
by Dave Handley 13 Jan '05

13 Jan '05

Jeff Garland wrote: > > Well, my feedback is going to be fairly shallow since I don't have lots of > time to look it over, but what I see looks pretty good. Both of the > composite > and visitor stuff would be nice additions. > Thanks :-) > One interesting question on composite is whether a boost::tree would > really be > all that's needed and might be a more general component that could be used > to > implement composite. Of course, you are really depending on pointer > semantics > and the clone, so it wouldn't be a minor change of course to go down that > path... > I'm pretty sure that the implementation I have of the composite would also work as a tree if you didn't use CRTP. I've not tested this, but just browsing my own code convinces me of it! I personally think that improvements could be made to the composite by incorporating some policies. I've not given this much thought, but options could include a memory management policy that allowed you to choose between: the current model with pointers and clone; a single type in the tree that used copy and value semantics; a smart_ptr based model. > I think instead of trying to create a 'patterns' library I would make 2 > standalone libraries: vistor and composite. The fact that these are > 'patterns' (ie: well known designs) isn't really strong enough to bind > them > together. > My reason for wanting to create a patterns library is actually from a desire to try and create a Loki equivalent in boost (with some additions). The inter-play between certain patterns is such that I think they could sit in the same library. For example, the work I've done on visiting composite trees, or the fact that an abstract factory is often a singleton, etc. Having said that, I would not be averse to them being different libraries if that was preferred. Dave

1 0

Re: Interesting Boost Implementation Details?
by Arkadiy Vertleyb 13 Jan '05

13 Jan '05

David Abrahams wrote: > * The way that Boost.MPL uses partial specialization on template > template parameters to peel apart lambda expressions and turn them into > metafunction classes. I thought I understand how it's done, but now that I am trying to apply this to my own problem, it seems that default template parameters may be a showstopper in applying this technique, at least in some compilers. For example if I have: template<class T> struct do_something; template<template<class> class T, class P0> struct do_something<T<P0> > {}; template<template<class, class> class T, class P0, class P1> struct do_something<T<P0, P1> > {}; GCC 3.4.2 can't figure out which specialization to use for, e.g., std::vector. At the same time VC71 is fine with this, and chooses the one with 2 parameteres. Unfortunately I am unable to find my way around the MPL source to figure out what's really done... Can you clarify this? Thanks in advance, Arkadiy

4 6

[MPL] unlambda primitive (was [Boost-users] [MPL] map question)
by Daniel Wallin 13 Jan '05

13 Jan '05

Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote: > Daniel Wallin writes: > >>>>I'm sorry if I'm being thick here, but I can't grasp this. To me protect >>>> looks exactly like what is needed here. I have always thought of >>>>protect as delaying the placeholder substitution one step, > >> >> >> Well, again, it's not what it does. If we are to talk about introducing >> another primitive that would cover the OP use case, then it's another >> discussion (which should be taken to the developers list). Well OK, let's do that. What are your thoughts about adding something like this? template< typename BOOST_MPL_AUX_NA_PARAM(T) > struct unlambda { template< typename X = na BOOST_MPL_PP_NESTED_DEF_PARAMS_TAIL(1, typename X, na) > struct apply { typedef T type; }; typedef unlambda type; }; ... /// special case for 'unlambda' template< typename T, typename Tag > struct lambda< mpl::unlambda<T>,Tag, int_<1> > { typedef true_ is_le; typedef mpl::bind0<mpl::unlambda<T> > result_; typedef result_ type; }; -- Daniel Wallin

5 14