March 2012 - Boost - lists.boost.org

[quickbook] controlling table of contents
by lcaminiti 14 Apr '12

14 Apr '12

Hello all, Is there a way for more fine control of QuickBook table of contents (toc)? Specifically, I'd like to: 1) Have a toc in the first page with only the sections (no subsections) listed. 2) Then, have a full toc on the second documentation page with all sections and subsections listed. I can use any rev of QuickBook for this. Thanks a lot. --Lorenzo -- View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/boost-quickbook-controlling-table-of-con… Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

3 6

[typeof] registration question
by Cromwell Enage 14 Apr '12

14 Apr '12

Hi, folks! In emulation mode, given the following definition: template <typename Container> struct some_metafunction { typedef BOOST_TYPEOF_TPL( Container().insert( typename Container::iterator() , typename Container::value_type() ) ) type; }; Which of the following types need to be registered? 1. The argument passed as `Container` 2. The result of `typename Container::iterator` 3. The result of `typename Container::value_type`

3 7

[lockfree] tagged_ptr as a separate library
by Philipp Moeller 12 Apr '12

12 Apr '12

In the review of lockfree it has been suggested that tagged_ptr should make it into the public API of lockfree. Wouldn't it make sense to move it into a separate library entirely? It would possibly get more exposure and cross-platform ports. The technique itself also requires some extra documentation. And it might find it's way into a release earlier than lock-free itself. Philipp Moeller

5 7

[range] adaptors vs. rvalue to lvalue& binding
by Arno Schödl 11 Apr '12

11 Apr '12

Hello, ideally I would like to use range-adapted lvalue ranges like any other lvalue ranges. Writing it down naively, as below, does not compile because LoadRefRange takes (and should take?) the range it modifies by lvalue&, while adaptor expressions are rvalues. template<typename Range> void modifies_range( Range& rng ); A a[5]; main() { // modifies all elements of a modifies_range ( a ); // modifies all elements (except for one) of a // adaptor is rvalue, does not compile: modifies_range ( boost::range::join( boost::adaptors::slice( a, 0, 1 ), boost::adaptors::slice( a, 2, countof(a) ) ) ); // compiles, but ugly: auto rng=boost::range::join( boost::adaptors::slice( a, 0, 1 ), boost::adaptors::slice( a, 2, countof(a) ) ); modifies_range(rng); } Any thoughts? Should adaptors receiving lvalues offer an operator adaptor&() &&; // overload on rvalue-ness so they are passing through the lvalue or their argument? A suitable baseclass a la boost::additive could do that. Regards, Arno -- Dr. Arno Schödl | aschoedl(a)think-cell.com Technical Director think-cell Software GmbH | Chausseestr. 8/E | 10115 Berlin | Germany http://www.think-cell.com | phone +49 30 666473-10 | US phone +1 800 891 8091 Amtsgericht Berlin-Charlottenburg, HRB 85229 | European Union VAT Id DE813474306 Directors: Dr. Markus Hannebauer, Dr. Arno Schoedl

8 21

[config] unexpected explicit operators conversion on some compilers.
by Vicente J. Botet Escriba 10 Apr '12

10 Apr '12

Hi, Given the following explicit bool conversion template<typename Mutex> class unique_lock { public: explicit operator bool() const BOOST_NOEXCEPT I was expecting the following code to compile fail (note the int cast) boost::unique_lock<boost::mutex> lk0; int i = int(lk0); It fails with gcc-4.7.0, but compile with gcc-4.6.2 and clang-3.0 (I have not tested yet with msvc). When BOOST_NO_EXPLICIT_CONVERSION_OPERATORS is defined I use the bool safe idiom to emulate the conversion #if defined(BOOST_NO_EXPLICIT_CONVERSION_OPERATORS) typedef void (unique_lock::*bool_type)(); operator bool_type() const BOOST_NOEXCEPT; bool operator!() const BOOST_NOEXCEPT; #else explicit operator bool() const BOOST_NOEXCEPT; #endif and in this case the compile fail as desired. Do we need a new macro to state that even if explicit operators are provide, there are some unexpected conversions that could be introduced? Best, Vicente

1 1

Release branch open for new libraries?
by Marshall Clow 10 Apr '12

10 Apr '12

When will the release branch be open for new libraries (for 1.50)? The calendar on Boost.org shows no dates for 1.50 at all. Thanks! -- Marshall Marshall Clow Idio Software <mailto:mclow.lists@gmail.com> A.D. 1517: Martin Luther nails his 95 Theses to the church door and is promptly moderated down to (-1, Flamebait). -- Yu Suzuki

3 8

[scope_exit] trunk tests fail on sun compiler
by lcaminiti 09 Apr '12

09 Apr '12

Hello all, I'm trying to get ScopeExit to work on Sun. 1) First it looked like all tests fail on this compiler: http://www.boost.org/development/tests/trunk/developer/scope_exit.html 2) However, I installed Solaris Studio 12.3 on my Ubuntu 10 and it seems that I can compile ScopeExit just fine with the following" $ CC -I /usr/include/i386-linux-gnu/ -I ../../.. -DBOOST_TYPEOF_EMULATION world_seq.cpp Note that: a) Sun does not support variadic macros so only ScopeExit sequence syntax will work. b) Sun does not support native type-of so BOOST_TYPEOF_EMULATION needs to be defined. Therefore, all original ScopeExit type-of emulation tests named `emulation_...` should compile (because they use the sequence syntax and define BOOST_TYPEOF_EMULATION). However, they fail... why? 3) Why when I click on the "fail" link for these tests I get no information on the Sun compiler's output? For example: http://www.boost.org/development/tests/trunk/developer/output/Sandia-sun-bo… If I follow this link I get "Error extracting file: No matching files were found.". What does this mean? Thanks a lot! --Lorenzo -- View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/boost-scope-exit-trunk-tests-fail-on-sun… Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

6 34

Nightly testing broken due to missing file
by Belcourt, K. Noel 07 Apr '12

07 Apr '12

error: Unable to find file or target named error: './sync/mutual_exclusion/locks/upgrade_lock/cons/ move_ctor_shared_lock_until_pass.cpp' error: referred from project at error: '../libs/thread/test'

3 2

[signals] [vc11] Compile Error (Ticket #1499)
by Joshua Boyce 04 Apr '12

04 Apr '12

The problem causing ticket #1499 is happening again under VC11. https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/1499 Build scripts and logs: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/74751/cpp/boost/logs/msvc32-20120319-1118.bat http://dl.dropbox.com/u/74751/cpp/boost/logs/msvc64-20120319-1118.bat http://dl.dropbox.com/u/74751/cpp/boost/logs/msvc32-20120319-1118.txt http://dl.dropbox.com/u/74751/cpp/boost/logs/msvc64-20120319-1118.txt Bumping to check for _MSC_VER <= 1700 does the trick (tested locally). Patch: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/74751/cpp/boost/patches/signals-vc11-fix-20120319-1… Once this is applied the trunk compiles cleanly (well, no errors, there are still lots of warnings) using the VC11 beta. Thanks.

2 3

[git] Mercurial?
by Daryle Walker 02 Apr '12

02 Apr '12

Git has a competitor called Mercurial? If we're moving to a Distributed-VCS, should we go to Mercurial instead of Git? They're kind-of like CVS vs. Subversion, except I think they came up in parallel. (While Subversion was designed as an updated CVS.) I think Git was made up of a bunch of script hacks, while Mercurial was a regimented single program. I don't have a preference, but I want to make sure we consider the rival options. Daryle W.

48 236

[test] Use of namespace qualifier before floating point functions in boost/test/impl/execution_monitor.hpp
by Jeremiah Willcock 02 Apr '12

02 Apr '12

According to http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009604599/basedefs/fenv.h.html, operations such as feclearexcept can be defined as macros, and at least some versions of Glibc do that by default. The use of explicit :: qualifiers before calls to those in Boost.Test fails to compile. Is there a workaround for that (other than __NO_MATH_INLINES)? -- Jeremiah Willcock

1 1

[quickbook] coloring code syntax
by lcaminiti 02 Apr '12

02 Apr '12

Hello all, Is there a way to tell QuickBook code fragments to color words that are not C++ keyword for example in blue or in other colors? For example, in `int i = 0;` "int" is colored in blue. I'd like that in `requires Copyable<T>` "requires" is colored in blue (or some other color that I can specify). Thanks a lot! --Lorenzo -- View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/boost-quickbook-coloring-code-syntax-tp4… Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

3 2

[result_of] Test fails on clang trunk and gcc-4.7 due to changes in FDIS
by Michel Morin 01 Apr '12

01 Apr '12

In the code below, const int f(); decltype(f()) i = 0; `i` has type `int` (not `const int`) in C++11. This is because `f()` is a prvalue of a non-class type (i.e. `const int`) and so its cv qualifiers are ignored. C++0x drafts (before FDIS) had a special rule for function calls in decltype: if e is a function call or an invocation of an overloaded operator (parentheses around e are ignored), decltype(e) is the return type of the statically chosen function; but this was removed in FDIS. Clang-3.1 (which will be clang-3.1) and gcc-4.7 seem to have implemented this change, and this change breaks the test case (libs/utility/test/result_of_test.cpp) on those compilers in a C++11 mode. The following are the errors messages: [1] result_of_test.cpp:210:3: error: static assertion failed: (is_same<result_of<const result_of_member_function_template(double)>::type, const double>::value) [2] result_of_test.cpp:211:3: error: static assertion failed: (is_same<result_of<volatile result_of_member_function_template(double)>::type, volatile double>::value) [3] result_of_test.cpp:212:3: error: static assertion failed: (is_same<result_of<const volatile result_of_member_function_template(double)>::type, const volatile double>::value) [4] result_of_test.cpp:239:3: error: static assertion failed: (is_same<result_of<const volatile no_result_type_or_result_of(void)>::type, const unsigned short>::value) [5] result_of_test.cpp:244:3: error: static assertion failed: (is_same<result_of<const volatile no_result_type_or_result_of_template<void>(void)>::type, const unsigned short>::value) Regards, Michel

3 10

Status of proposed boost.overload?
by niXman 01 Apr '12

01 Apr '12

Hello list! boost.overload: http://svn.boost.org/svn/boost/sandbox/overload/ The library will be accepted into the boost libraries ? -- Regards, niXman

5 11

[container][memory] Request to move allocator_arg_t and uses_allocator to a memory related file.
by Vicente J. Botet Escriba 31 Mar '12

31 Mar '12

Hi, I want to add Allocators to the packaged_task and promise class of Boost.Thread template <class Allocator> promise(allocator_arg_t, const Allocator& a); template <class F, class Allocator> explicit packaged_task(allocator_arg_t, const Allocator& a, F&& f); I see that Boost.Container has already defined in namespace boost::container and in file boost/container/scoped_allocator.hpp the following struct allocator_arg_t { }; constexpr allocator_arg_t allocator_arg = allocator_arg_t(); template <class T, class Alloc> struct uses_allocator; I would like to shared these to all the Boost libraries. I don't think it is a good idea to make Boost.Thread depend on Boost.Container just for this. Could these declarations be included in a specific file? These declaration are included in <memory> in the C++11. What would be the best library to contain these declarations? What about a new boost/memory.hpp file? What about moving them to the boost or boost::memory namespace? Best, Vicente

2 5

[offtopic] C++Now! Room Reservation at Aspen Meadows
by Hartmut Kaiser 31 Mar '12

31 Mar '12

Hey all, If somebody needs a room reservation at the Aspen Meadows for C++Now in May, please get in contact with me offline. I have to cancel my trip and would like to avoid the cancellation penalty for my booked room. Regards Hartmut --------------- http://boost-spirit.com http://stellar.cct.lsu.edu

1 0

[guideline] 31 character filenames?
by Eric Niebler 30 Mar '12

30 Mar '12

Our current guidelines[1] say filenames should not exceed 31 characters. This was recently brought to my attention by a bug[2] from someone who actually cares because he uses the ODS-2 filesystem on OpenVMS. On a lark, I hacked the inspect tool to check for too-long filenames and lo! found a bazillion. Most (but not all) violations are from doc files auto-generated by doxygen and docbook, but which nevertheless go out with the boost distribution and so should conform. (Right?) So, should we care? Considering that we have little control(?) over how doxygen and docbook generate their files? I have fixed the bug in question, but it feels like a token effort. Should we just drop support for niche filesystems like ODS-2, and close all future bugs "won't fix"? [1] http://www.boost.org/development/requirements.html [2] https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/6196 -- Eric Niebler BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com

10 14

[Assign][GIL] Boost Assign and GIL incompatibility in gcc 4.3.2
by Andrew Hundt 29 Mar '12

29 Mar '12

The following source code compiles under clang 3.1, but fails under gcc 4.3.2 with boost version 1.46. It doesn't look like there are updates to either library in the boost news list since then. #include <vector> #include <boost/assign/std/vector.hpp> // for 'operator+=()' #include <boost/gil/gil_all.hpp> int main(int argc, char** argv){ using namespace boost::assign; std::vector<int> values; values += 1, 2, 3, 4; typedef boost::gil::rgb8_pixel_t pt; std::vector<pt> pixValues; pixValues += pt(1,2,3),pt(2,3,4); } ------------------------------------- Compiler versions: FAILED: gcc (SUSE Linux) 4.3.2 [gcc-4_3-branch revision 141291] Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. SUCCEEDED: Apple clang version 3.1 (tags/Apple/clang-318.0.54) (based on LLVM 3.1svn) Target: x86_64-apple-darwin11.3.0 Thread model: posix Cheers! Andrew Hundt

3 3

Arena/Linear allocators
by Olaf van der Spek 29 Mar '12

29 Mar '12

Hi, I'm looking for arena/linear allocators, for use with multi_index, unordered_map and others. Does Boost provide anything like this? There's Boost Pool, but it only provides a singleton pool allocator. -- Olaf

2 2

[contract] nothing special about nested classes
by lcaminiti 29 Mar '12

29 Mar '12

Hello all, In the _many_ Contract Programming references that I have read (including N1962): http://contractpp.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/contractpp/trunk/doc/html/cont… I didn't find anything special about contracts for nested classes. I think that is because nested classes are executed at run-time "orthogonally" with respect to their enclosing classes. In other words, nesting a class only nests it's name (and changes some visibility rules) but it does not effect the run-time execution of the class and therefore it does not affect the contracts checked for the nested class. For example, the execution of a nested class y should only check y's invariants and not also the invariants of its enclosing class x: #include <contract.hpp> #include <iostream> CONTRACT_CLASS( struct (x) // enclosing class ) { CONTRACT_CLASS_INVARIANT( std::cout << "x's invariant" << std::endl ) CONTRACT_CLASS( public struct (y) // nested class ) { CONTRACT_CLASS_INVARIANT( std::cout << "y's invariant" << std::endl ) CONTRACT_FUNCTION( public void (f) ( void ) ) {} }; }; int main ( void ) { x::y yy; yy.f(); // checks y's invariant but not x's invariant return 0; } In fact in this example an object of x is not even created. Of course, if y was to create or get an object of x and invoke x's member functions then x's contracts will be checked as usual. This makes sense to me but I thought to share it with the ML. Thanks. --Lorenzo -- View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/boost-contract-nothing-special-about-nes… Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

1 0

Boost Optional
by Rafael Justo 29 Mar '12

29 Mar '12

Hello! This is my first post in this list. =) I was looking today at Boost Optional (great work!). And I was wondering how could I do something like the bellow code. -------------------------------- #include <boost/optional.hpp> class Test {}; boost::optional<Test> get() { return boost::optional<Test>(); } int main() { if (get() == true) { // OK } else if (get() == false) { // ERROR } return 0; } -------------------------------- But there's no "operator==" with bool in optional.hpp, so the above code don't compile (i have checked version 1.49). Is it possible to add the patch described bellow in optional.hpp to solve this problem? -------------------------------- --- boost_1_49_0/boost/optional/optional.hpp 2010-12-18 19:29:39.000000000 -0200 +++ boost_1_49_0_new/boost/optional/optional.hpp 2012-03-28 16:03:53.417578997 -0300 @@ -616,6 +616,11 @@ return *this ; } + bool operator== (const bool condition) + { + return ((*this && condition) || (!*this && !condition)); + } + void swap( optional & arg ) { // allow for Koenig lookup -------------------------------- Best regards, Rafael Justo

4 4

using of circular_buffer
by news.gmane.org 28 Mar '12

28 Mar '12

Hello there, i am new here and i just want to say "hi". so, i'm using boost almost a year now, usually i just used the array component. latley i wanted to implement the circular_buffer. i've defined it in a class after the private-modifier like this: boost::circular_buffer<std::string> textBuffer(10); (as take from the documentation) but my compiler on minGW will throw an error. so, i guess i got something wrong in declaring a string-textbuffer with the lenght of 10?! in the boost-docs there is following example: boost::circular_buffer<int> cb(3); help is appreciated, best would be a working example and a little hint which information is may have missed. greetings tony

3 4

Fwd: [Boost-bugs] [Boost C++ Libraries] #380: Support for bundled properties in graph adaptors
by Marshall Clow 28 Mar '12

28 Mar '12

I just wanted everyone to notice that Jeremiah just closed a _seven year old_ bug in boost. -- Marshall Begin forwarded message: > From: "Boost C++ Libraries" <noreply(a)lists.boost.org> > Subject: Re: [Boost-bugs] [Boost C++ Libraries] #380: Support for bundled properties in graph adaptors > Date: March 28, 2012 1:47:03 PM PDT > Cc: boost-bugs(a)lists.boost.org > Reply-To: boost(a)lists.boost.org > > #380: Support for bundled properties in graph adaptors > -----------------------------------+---------------------------------------- > Reporter: dgregor | Owner: dgregor > Type: Bugs | Status: closed > Milestone: To Be Determined | Component: graph > Version: Boost Release Branch | Severity: Problem > Resolution: wontfix | Keywords: > -----------------------------------+---------------------------------------- > Changes (by jewillco): > > * status: reopened => closed > * resolution: => wontfix > > > Old description: > >> {{{ >> The graph adaptors (such as subgraph) do not support bundled >> properties, but they should. >> }}} > > New description: > > {{{ > The graph adaptors (such as subgraph) do not support bundled > properties, but they should. > }}} > > -- > > Comment: > > This is likely to work now, so closing as wontfix. Please reopen if the > problem still exists in the trunk version of Boost. > > -- > Ticket URL: <https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/380#comment:7> > Boost C++ Libraries <http://www.boost.org/> > Boost provides free peer-reviewed portable C++ source libraries. > _______________________________________________ > Boost-bugs mailing list > Boost-bugs(a)lists.boost.org > http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-bugs -- Marshall Marshall Clow Idio Software <mailto:mclow.lists@gmail.com> A.D. 1517: Martin Luther nails his 95 Theses to the church door and is promptly moderated down to (-1, Flamebait). -- Yu Suzuki

2 1

DCVS vs CVS: call for constructivism
by Philippe Vaucher 28 Mar '12

28 Mar '12

Hello, I think we all know understood that there are people from both camps, some with emotional arguments, some with constructive arguments, but it's not really moving anywhere. We need to start listing what would have to be done and once we have such a map see if it's worth it before discussing pointless things. Just so we can redirect people saying things like "Nobody told me a real advantage yet" to this post, here's a recapitulation of what I think the advantages/disadvantages of a DCVS is ( http://www.ericsink.com/vcbe/html/dvcs_advantages.html, http://www.ericsink.com/vcbe/html/dvcs_weaknesses.html) Pro: - Offline work (you can use diffs, you can commit) - Speed of operations compared to svn - No need to setup a server to work locally (encourages participation (focus on working first, then sharing later)) Cons: - Cannot check out subpaths - Cannot lock files - Would require people to change their habits and learn new tools I think most people in the svn-camp will tell that with the 1.8 checkpoints feature you can now also commit while offline and thus the only advantages for DCVS seems to be speed and the ability to check all the data while offline. I think the people that are opposed to the change unfortunately won't be convinced by those arguments, even tho pretty much every who switched to DCVS will tell you that the advantages are worth it and it's more than simply speed or freedom, it's a philosophy etc. So I think the best thing to do now is first to make a map of what would have to be done if we decided to switch, to see if it's an option at all. Here's a simple draft, please participate into making it better: - Import current history - Migrate the existing hooks - Migrate the existing scripts around. - Migrate the test runners - Trac / Website integration (redmine with git extensions?) - Rights management (gitolite?) - Update release procedures Maybe we'd start a page on the wiki, but the idea is to find out if there are more steps to be done and if there's any showstopper in those steps. I think the best solution would be to offer the repository with several protocols, namely git/hg/svn so everyone could use the tool they want (e.g github offers svn/git, I know other hosts do it too). Philippe

10 19

[Lockfree] Small compilation error with gcc -Wall
by Julien Nitard 28 Mar '12

28 Mar '12

Hi all, The following code seems to generate an "unused variable" variable warning with g++ -Wall. I am working on the latest version available from git, though I am not sure if this version is relevant. #include <boost/lockfree/fifo.hpp> typedef boost::lockfree::fifo<ReplicateData, boost::lockfree::static_freelist_t> Queue; Queue _buffer(4096); It occurs in fifo.hpp at line 263. Replacing tagged_node_ptr head2 = head_.load(memory_order_relaxed); By head_.load(memory_order_relaxed); Seems to do the job. Many thanks, Julien

2 1