December 2020 - Boost - lists.boost.org

CMake Announcement from Boost Steering Committee
by Jon Kalb 13 Aug '24

13 Aug '24

The libraries produced by the Boost community have had a greater impact on the way that the C++ community writes code than any other library implementation. The focus of the Boost community will always be on the libraries, but it is undeniable that we are dependent on and often limited by the infrastructure of our trade. Years ago, the move to Git was contentious; yet, it was required to improve development. In a similar vein our build system has become an impediment for many developers and users, existing and prospective. Therefore, we, the Steering Committee, announce to the Boost community our desire and intent to move Boost’s build system to CMake for users and developers alike. We are soliciting comments and proposals from the community to guide the process and the goals. Our desire is that the community can come to consensus by the end of the calendar year with a vision of supporting users and developers. We understand that the actual process of achieving the end goal will be long, time consuming, and not without its share of conflict. We also recognize that the Boost community is comprised of bright and passionate individuals that are eager to get involved and help get work done. The members of the Steering Committee have been encouraged by the discussions and activity surrounding CMake on the mailing lists over the years and know that many people have voiced visions. We hope that each of you rejoins the discussion to support this initiative and contributes to the common goal of improving Boost’s integration into the broader C++ ecosystem. For the Boost Steering Committee, Jon Kalb, Chair jonkalb(a)boost.org

49 200

Boost.Text is looking for a (mini-)review manager
by Zach Laine 07 Dec '22

07 Dec '22

I've made all the recommended changes to Boost.Text that came up in the review. Glen, the previous review manager, recommended a mini review of Boost.Text once I'd made those changes. If you'd like to manage the mini-review, please let me know. For everyone, including potential reviewers and review managers, here are the major changes: * All the specific review feedback issues have been addressed. * The string layer is now gone. * The text layer got a major re-work. It is now a set of template-based adaptors (basic_text<>, vs. a text typedef. etc.), which lets everyone get what they want. You can change the underlying storage type (including whatever allocator you prefer), select UTF-8 or UTF-16, and change the normalization form. Glen recommended I drop this layer, but the library is way less useful without this stuff, and these changes address all the concerns raised about the text layer in the review. The updated docs can be found here: https://tzlaine.github.io/text/doc/html/index.html Oh yeah, and I added concept constraints to the whole library when you build in C++20 mode. Zach

17 46

[review][JSON] Review of JSON starts today: Sept 14 - Sept 23
by Pranam Lashkari 09 Aug '22

09 Aug '22

Boost formal review of Vinnie Falco and Krystian Stasiowski's library JSON starts today and will run for 10 days ending on 23 Sept 2020. Both of these authors have already developed a couple of libraries which are accepted in Boost(boost beast and Static String) This library focuses on a common and popular use-case for JSON. It provides a container to hold parsed and serialised JSON types. It provides more flexibility and better benchmark performance than its competitors. JSON highlights the following features in the documentation: - Fast compilation - Require only C++11 - Fast streaming parser and serializer - Easy and safe API with allocator support - Constant-time key lookup for objects - Options to allow non-standard JSON - Compile without Boost, define BOOST_JSON_STANDALONE - Optional header-only, without linking to a library (a point I would like to add in highlight: it has cool Jason logo 😝) To quickly understand and get the flavour of the library take a look at "Quick Look" <http://master.json.cpp.al/json/usage/quick_look.html> You can find the source code to be reviewed here: <https://github.com/CPPAlliance/json/tree/master> You can find the latest documentation here: <http://master.json.cpp.al/> Benchmarks are also given in the document which can be found here: <http://master.json.cpp.al/json/benchmarks.html> Some people have also given the early reviews, the thread can be found here: <https://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2020/09/249745.php> Please provide in your review information you think is valuable to understand your choice to ACCEPT or REJECT including JSON as a Boost library. Please be explicit about your decision (ACCEPT or REJECT). Some other questions you might want to consider answering: - What is your evaluation of the design? - What is your evaluation of the implementation? - What is your evaluation of the documentation? - What is your evaluation of the potential usefulness of the library? - Did you try to use the library? With which compiler(s)? Did you have any problems? - How much effort did you put into your evaluation? A glance? A quick reading? In-depth study? - Are you knowledgeable about the problem domain? More information about the Boost Formal Review Process can be found here: <http://www.boost.org/community/reviews.html> Thank you for your effort in the Boost community. -- Thank you, Pranam Lashkari, https://lpranam.github.io/

21 73

Adding my sorting algorithm, ska_sort, to boost, attempt 2
by Malte Skarupke 24 Nov '21

24 Nov '21

Hi everyone, I started a discussion about this in October, but at the time the maintainer of the sort library was busy, then I was busy, so now it's January... I wrote a generalized version of radix sort a couple years ago and gave a talk about it here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zqs87a_7zxw I would like to get a new version of that sorting algorithm into boost. It's faster than what I showed several years ago. It's also even more general and has a new interface that should be easier to extend. I uploaded the code here: https://github.com/skarupke/sort/tree/master The documentation is also already updated with new benchmark results. Let me know what's required to get this into boost. Would you like this in the form of a pull request? One of the big things that probably needs review is the interface, since radix sorting works differently than comparison based sorting. For most normal uses you just need to provide a sort key, but more complicated cases can get more complicated. I tried very hard to make everything easy, but I'd also be curious if others can come up with better ways of doing the interface. Thanks, Malte -- Malte Skarupke malteskarupke(a)fastmail.fm

8 10

Re: [boost] Boost website changes and .'cxxstd'
by Donovan Dikaio 20 Mar '21

20 Mar '21

I can look into it. But needs to make the requirements clear. So, the task is to show *C++ standard minimum level: C++nn* for Standard attribute for each lib in this page: C++ standard minimum level: C++nn ? And we could replace nn with the actual number by checking the *cxxstd* key in a library's meta info json file. Please let me know if I got it right. On Fri, Dec 25, 2020 at 10:00 AM Louis Tatta <louis(a)cppalliance.org> wrote: > > > ---------- Forwarded message --------- > From: Edward Diener via Boost <boost(a)lists.boost.org> > Date: Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 7:39 PM > Subject: [boost] Boost website changes and .'cxxstd' > To: <boost(a)lists.boost.org> > CC: Edward Diener <eldiener(a)tropicsoft.com> > > > Even though I have worked a little with PHP in the past I do not have > the talent to make the change to the website which would incorporate the > addition of the meta information json field 'cxxstd' to the Boost > documentation web page for each library. The idea is that if 'cxxstd' is > set to a value the documentation for that library would also show: > > C++ standard minimum level: C++nn > > where nn would be 11, 14, 17, or 20 depending on the value of 'cxxstd'. > Alternatively if there is no 'cxxstd' entry for a library or if the > value of 'cxxstd' is '03', we could either specify 'nn' as '03' or leave > off the line stating the 'C++ standard minimum level completely. > > On the face of it this should be doable in the website code but > evidently Daniel James is the only one who really understands how this > works in the code and he is no longer active in Boost. So if someone > else who understands the website code and PHP could do this it would be > appreciated, since I think it will be valuable telling end-users whether > a Boost library is usable at the C++ compiler level they are using. > > > _______________________________________________ > Unsubscribe & other changes: > http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost >

8 43

[release] Reminder about 1.75.0 release notes
by Marshall Clow 11 Mar '21

11 Mar '21

The master branch is closing on Wednesday for the 1.75.0 release. If you have information that should go into the release notes, now’s the time to add it. Create a PR against https://github.com/boostorg/website/blob/master/feed/history/boost_1_75_0.q… <https://github.com/boostorg/website/blob/master/feed/history/boost_1_75_0.q…> — Marshall

2 3

Feedback desired for neural networks library
by Sergei Marchenko 11 Jan '21

11 Jan '21

Hi everyone, I have a template-based library with several common types of layers which can be assembled into various neural networks: https://github.com/svm-git/NeuralNet, and I would love to get community feedback on the overall design, any issues or missing features, and how interesting a library like that would be in general. I've been watching the trends and research reports in the AI/ML space, and I feel that the recent announcements of the successful models for image classification, computer vision or natural language processing, push the focus towards very complex and computationally intensive networks. However, I think that the idea behind multi-layer networks is very powerful, and is applicable in many domains, where even a small and lightweight model can be used successfully. I also think that if developers have an access to a library of building blocks that allows them to train and run NN anywhere a C++ code can run, it may encourage a lot of good applications. In the current state, the library is fairly small and should be easy to review. It was built with two main goals in mind: * Provide a collection of building blocks that share a common interface which allows plug'n'play construction of more complex NNs. * Compile-time verification of the internal consistency of the network. I.e. if a layer's output size does not match the next layer's input, it is caught at the very early stage. Once it seems like there is some consensus on the core design and usefulness of such library, I am willing to do the work necessary to make the library consistent with Boost requirements for naming convention, folder structure, unit tests etc. The library relies on the C++ 11 language features and has a dependency on just a few STL components, so I think it should be straightforward to merge into Boost. Best regards, Sergei Marchenko.

6 15

C++11 on up Boost libraries
by Edward Diener 04 Jan '21

04 Jan '21

In my effort to set the meta information of 'cxxstd' for the appropriate C++11 on up libraries, my PRs for these libraries have been kindly merged to 'develop' by the library maintainers: beast callable_traits context convert coroutine2 fiber geometry gil hana histogram hof json leaf mp11 nowide outcome pfr process safe_numerics static_string stl_interfaces variant2 yap If anyone knows of any other current library which is a C++11 on up library, please tell me. My testing showed that all other Boost libraries will work in C++03 mode, but maybe I missed some other library which is a C++11 on up library. Needless to say other libraries have noted their attention to move from C++03 to C++11 in the near future. If any library does change the C++ mode necessary to use that library, I hope the maintainer(s) of that library will update the 'cxxstd' meta information appropriately. If we can get the website to work properly using the 'cxxstd' meta information, end-users should be able to know immediately whether a Boost library is usable depending on the C++ standard mode their are using.

10 20

Re: [boost] Boost website changes and .'cxxstd`
by Donovan Dikaio 30 Dec '20

30 Dec '20

Hi Edward, you're right. The beta website link is https://beta.boost.org/ FYI, there is a file 'libraries.txt' in the source codes which contains all the libraries info. It looks like that it can be generated by a site tool. To my codes review, there exist multiple records for a library for various versions in the above text file. And the codes check and compare a library record’s version info with the current version, and pick one matching a condition. There is no record with 'cxxstd' field at the text file for beta website but for main site. Unfortunately, there is no one to match version comparison condition for main site as well at the moment. The updates codes of beta website will only show 'C++ standard minimum level' with 'cxxstd' value only if a 'cxxstd' value exists.

2 1

Potential order statistic tree?
by Soronel Haetir 29 Dec '20

29 Dec '20

Boost developers, Would there be interest in adding an order statistic tree to the boost library? That is, a tree that instead of being sorted simply keeps nodes in whatever order is specified, along with a (potentially multi-index) per-node value and a total of per-node values of each node and its left-descent tree. I currently have two such types, a very capable intrusive version (not based on boost::intrusive though using some of the same ideas) and a less capable non-intrusive form that uses the mechanics of the intrusive form as an implementation detail. The reason for not being based on Boost.Intrusive is that the tree algorithms that Boost.Intrusive provides are all for search trees and this very definitely is not, plus the need to alter node weights during insert, delete and rotations and the Boost.Intrusive algorithm providers not having a good place to add that behavior. I have personally found this type very useful while implementing a rope container and also while implementing tracking for various parts of a text editor (that is, paragraph, line and run positions) (in terms of characters, graphemes and screen height). Perhaps the major drawback to what I have is that I have not been careful to isolate c++-version dependent code. Although I know it does compile with the latest msvc 2019 as well as the clang 10.0 that MS ships. I am simply not sure whether such a type has a broad enough appeal to make the work of adding it to boost worthwhile. -- Soronel Haetir soronel.haetir(a)gmail.com

4 3

Boost website changes and .'cxxstd'
by Edward Diener 24 Dec '20

24 Dec '20

Even though I have worked a little with PHP in the past I do not have the talent to make the change to the website which would incorporate the addition of the meta information json field 'cxxstd' to the Boost documentation web page for each library. The idea is that if 'cxxstd' is set to a value the documentation for that library would also show: C++ standard minimum level: C++nn where nn would be 11, 14, 17, or 20 depending on the value of 'cxxstd'. Alternatively if there is no 'cxxstd' entry for a library or if the value of 'cxxstd' is '03', we could either specify 'nn' as '03' or leave off the line stating the 'C++ standard minimum level completely. On the face of it this should be doable in the website code but evidently Daniel James is the only one who really understands how this works in the code and he is no longer active in Boost. So if someone else who understands the website code and PHP could do this it would be appreciated, since I think it will be valuable telling end-users whether a Boost library is usable at the C++ compiler level they are using.

3 3

(no subject)
by Harsh 21 Dec '20

21 Dec '20

Respected Sir/Madam Myself Harsh Agarwal a highly interested candidate to work on with ublas as a open source contributor but at starting need some guidance-: 1-:How can i start on with it. 2-: As if i want to participate in Gsoc 2021 till when will i get competency test. 3-: can i know about the basic project idea that will be for gsoc 2021 thanking you Harsh Agarwal 21/12/2020

2 1

regarding boost gsoc competency test 2021
by Mohd Huzaifa 20 Dec '20

20 Dec '20

hii sir/madam I want to ask about the boost competency test for gsoc 2021. When it will be available. And can I get the list of past competency tests.

2 1

Tagging the minimum C++ standard level for Boost libs
by Edward Diener 19 Dec '20

19 Dec '20

I had previously proposed that we tag the minimum C++ standard level for Boost libs by adding information to the json meta information in libraries.json for each library. I would like to revisit that proposal, which involved more elaborate suggestions, with this simpler overall proposal: for each Boost C++ library whose minimum C++ standard level is C++11 or above we add a json field called 'cxxstd' whose value corresponds to one of the same values as currently exists in Boost.Build for the 'cxxstd' feature, ie. 11,14,17,20, to the libraries.json file for that library. This json value can then be used in Boost documentation of each library to specify the minimum C++ standard level needed by an end-user in order to use that library. Obviously we can also add "cxxstd": "03" for the many Boost libraries which can still be used at the C++98/C++03 compilation level also, even though I would argue that not having a "cxxstd" json field should mean C++98/C++03 by default. I would be willing to create the necessary PRs for each library, as I have a pretty good internal list of this information. The gist of this proposal is to make it much easier for end-users wishing to use a Boost library to immediately know whether the library they wish to use is usable at the C++ standard compilation level they are using for compilation, without having to spend time searching for such information, which is often not readily available, in the documentation of the library they are considering. I can go ahead and start doing this now, but of course I am willing to listen to what others think about this. But let's not let another round of inertia stop doing at all what should be a simple means of telling end-user's whether a Boost library is at least minimally usable by them in their C++ projects.

5 13

Re: [boost] [release] Boost 1.75.0 Release Candidate 1
by Glen Fernandes 17 Dec '20

17 Dec '20

On 2020-12-13 03:34:00 Glen Fernandes wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 12, 2020 at 8:16 PM Edward Diener wrote: >> The final issue was that the index.html for the release showed 1.74 >> rather than 1.75. This seems to be generated from some sort of template >> where '{{version}}' is supposed to be plugged in by the correct version, >> but evidently did not work properly. Maybe someone who knows how this is >> supposed to work, but evidently did not, can look at it. > > Sounds like generate.php?page=index.html&version=<version> was invoked > with the wrong <version> . I'll take a look and see what I can find. Fixed: https://github.com/boostorg/release-tools/commit/b08dbc34451e9f5b09ec44cab5… Glen

1 0

Boost Pub/Sub message service model Implementation
by Rakshita Parihar 15 Dec '20

15 Dec '20

Hello, Currently, I am working on an IoT project where I need to send data from client to server. To transfer data, I need to setup a Pub/Sub message service model. Presently, I am using MQTT Paho C libraries to transmit data to server over TCP IP protocol but I want to switch to boost C++ library for the publish/subscribe model. I am a newbie to this library and have some queries: *1) Is there any boost C++ library for pub/sub model? If yes, please give me the details or link for the tutorial.* *2) If no library is present, please tell me how to implement a message pub/sub <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Publish%E2%80%93subscribe_pattern> service to communicate using boost C++ library?* Please, help me to solve these issues. Thanks & Regards, Rakshita Parihar

5 5

[release] Boost 1.75.0 Release Candidate 1
by Marshall Clow 13 Dec '20

13 Dec '20

[release] Boost 1.75.0 Release Candidate 1 The first release candidates for the 1.75.0 release are now available at: <https://dl.bintray.com/boostorg/release/1.75.0/source/> The SHA256 checksums are as follows: caf36d7c13b3d8ce62282a64a695113945a13b0f1796a45160726d04295f95ed boost_1_75_0_rc1.zip aeb26f80e80945e82ee93e5939baebdca47b9dee80a07d3144be1e1a6a66dd6a boost_1_75_0_rc1.tar.gz 953db31e016db7bb207f11432bef7df100516eeb746843fa0486a222e3fd49cb boost_1_75_0_rc1.tar.bz2 3a8b314871646e7404886736273c053278ba71b11347f72d4751411d65d6d1a5 boost_1_75_0_rc1.7z As always, the release managers would appreciate it if you download the candidate of your choice and give building it a try. Please report both success and failure, and anything else that is noteworthy. -- The Release managers

6 11

bootstrap was broken since 1.74
by Neo Anderson 12 Dec '20

12 Dec '20

Hi List, I am a casual user of boost library. I usually build boost for use to build CodeBlocks IDE on Windows platform. But since version 1.74, I found that bootstrap.bat was broken. So I skipped 1.74 and stuck to the old version 1.73. Today I am happy to see that 1.75 was out and I thought this problem would have been fixed since it’s a small problem. But I am wrong. I think line 15 lacks command line parameter: call .\build.bat %1. After adding that %1, I successfully built b2 with bootstrap.cmd gcc. But when I run .\b2, I get very confusing error messages (which are the same ones in 1.74): C:\Build\src\boost_1_75_0>.\b2 Performing configuration checks - default address-model : 32-bit - default architecture : x86 Building the Boost C++ Libraries. - compiler supports SSE2 : yes - compiler supports SSE4.1 : yes - has synchronization.lib : yes - C++11 mutex : yes - has BCrypt API : yes - has stat::st_mtim : no - has stat::st_mtimensec : no - has stat::st_mtimespec : no - has stat::st_birthtim : no - has stat::st_birthtimensec : no - has stat::st_birthtimespec : no - has statx : no - has statx syscall : no - cxx11_auto_declarations : yes - cxx11_constexpr : yes - cxx11_defaulted_functions : yes - cxx11_final : yes - cxx11_hdr_mutex : yes - cxx11_hdr_tuple : yes - cxx11_lambdas : yes - cxx11_noexcept : yes - cxx11_nullptr : yes - cxx11_rvalue_references : yes - cxx11_template_aliases : yes - cxx11_thread_local : no - cxx11_variadic_templates : yes - has_icu builds : no warning: Graph library does not contain MPI-based parallel components. note: to enable them, add "using mpi ;" to your user-config.jam. note: to suppress this message, pass "--without-graph_parallel" to bjam. - zlib : yes - bzip2 : no - lzma : no - zstd : yes - lzma : no - has_lzma_cputhreads builds : no - cxx11_alignas : yes - cxx11_decltype : yes - iconv (libc) : no - iconv (separate) : yes - icu : no - icu (lib64) : no - native atomic int32 supported : yes - has message compiler : no - native syslog supported : no - pthread supports robust mutexes : no - compiler supports SSSE3 : yes - compiler supports AVX2 : yes - gcc visibility : yes - long double support : yes warning: skipping optional Message Passing Interface (MPI) library. note: to enable MPI support, add "using mpi ;" to user-config.jam. note: to suppress this message, pass "--without-mpi" to bjam. note: otherwise, you can safely ignore this message. - cxx11_static_assert : yes - std::fstream is moveable and swappable : yes - Has Large File Support : yes warning: No python installation configured and autoconfiguration note: failed. See http://www.boost.org/libs/python/doc/building.html note: for configuration instructions or pass --without-python to note: suppress this message and silently skip all Boost.Python targets - libbacktrace builds : no - addr2line builds : no - WinDbg builds : yes - WinDbgCached builds : no - BOOST_COMP_GNUC >= 4.3.0 : yes - zlib : yes (cached) - bzip2 : no (cached) - lzma : no (cached) - zstd : yes (cached) - compiler supports SSE2 : no - compiler supports SSE4.1 : no - has synchronization.lib : no - C++11 mutex : no - has BCrypt API : no - is Windows CE : no - has stat::st_mtim : no - has stat::st_mtimensec : no - has stat::st_mtimespec : no - has stat::st_birthtim : no - has stat::st_birthtimensec : no - has stat::st_birthtimespec : no - has statx : no - has statx syscall : no - cxx11_auto_declarations : no - cxx11_constexpr : no - cxx11_defaulted_functions : no - cxx11_final : no - cxx11_hdr_mutex : no - cxx11_hdr_tuple : no - cxx11_lambdas : no - cxx11_noexcept : no - cxx11_nullptr : no - cxx11_rvalue_references : no - cxx11_template_aliases : no - cxx11_thread_local : no - cxx11_variadic_templates : no - native atomic int32 supported : no - has message compiler : no - native syslog supported : no - pthread supports robust mutexes : no - has_icu builds : no - compiler supports SSSE3 : no - compiler supports AVX2 : no C:/Build/src/boost_1_75_0/tools/build/src/build\targets.jam:609: in start-building from module targe ts error: Recursion in main target references error: the following target are being built currently: error: ./forward ./stage ./stage-proper libs/filesystem/build/stage libs/filesystem/build/stage-depe ndencies libs/log/build/stage libs/log/build/stage-dependencies libs/filesystem/build/stage C:/Build/src/boost_1_75_0/tools/build/src/build\targets.jam:776: in class(a)main-target.generate from module object(main-target)@7282 C:/Build/src/boost_1_75_0/tools/boost_install\boost-install.jam:1176: in generate-dependencies from module boost-install C:/Build/src/boost_1_75_0/tools/build/src/kernel\modules.jam:107: in modules.call-in from module boo st-install C:/Build/src/boost_1_75_0/tools/build/src/util\indirect.jam:105: in indirect.call from module indire ct C:/Build/src/boost_1_75_0/tools/build/src/tools\generate.jam:59: in construct from module object(gen erated-target-class)@2809 C:/Build/src/boost_1_75_0/tools/build/src/build\targets.jam:1364: in class(a)basic-target.generate fro m module object(generated-target-class)@2809 C:/Build/src/boost_1_75_0/tools/build/src/build\targets.jam:812: in generate-really from module obje ct(main-target)@11221 C:/Build/src/boost_1_75_0/tools/build/src/build\targets.jam:784: in class(a)main-target.generate from module object(main-target)@11221 C:/Build/src/boost_1_75_0/tools/build/src/build\targets.jam:934: in targets.generate-from-reference from module targets C:/Build/src/boost_1_75_0/tools/build/src/build\targets.jam:1277: in generate-dependencies from modu le object(alias-target-class)@2810 C:/Build/src/boost_1_75_0/tools/build/src/build\targets.jam:1334: in class(a)basic-target.generate fro m module object(alias-target-class)@2810 C:/Build/src/boost_1_75_0/tools/build/src/build\targets.jam:812: in generate-really from module obje ct(main-target)@11222 C:/Build/src/boost_1_75_0/tools/build/src/build\targets.jam:784: in class(a)main-target.generate from module object(main-target)@11222 C:/Build/src/boost_1_75_0/tools/boost_install\boost-install.jam:1176: in generate-dependencies from module boost-install C:/Build/src/boost_1_75_0/tools/build/src/kernel\modules.jam:107: in modules.call-in from module boo st-install C:/Build/src/boost_1_75_0/tools/build/src/util\indirect.jam:105: in indirect.call from module indire ct C:/Build/src/boost_1_75_0/tools/build/src/tools\generate.jam:59: in construct from module object(gen erated-target-class)@1817 C:/Build/src/boost_1_75_0/tools/build/src/build\targets.jam:1364: in class(a)basic-target.generate fro m module object(generated-target-class)@1817 C:/Build/src/boost_1_75_0/tools/build/src/build\targets.jam:812: in generate-really from module obje ct(main-target)@7281 C:/Build/src/boost_1_75_0/tools/build/src/build\targets.jam:784: in class(a)main-target.generate from module object(main-target)@7281 C:/Build/src/boost_1_75_0/tools/build/src/build\targets.jam:934: in targets.generate-from-reference from module targets C:/Build/src/boost_1_75_0/tools/build/src/build\targets.jam:1277: in generate-dependencies from modu le object(alias-target-class)@1818 C:/Build/src/boost_1_75_0/tools/build/src/build\targets.jam:1334: in class(a)basic-target.generate fro m module object(alias-target-class)@1818 C:/Build/src/boost_1_75_0/tools/build/src/build\targets.jam:812: in generate-really from module obje ct(main-target)@7282 C:/Build/src/boost_1_75_0/tools/build/src/build\targets.jam:784: in class(a)main-target.generate from module object(main-target)@7282 C:/Build/src/boost_1_75_0/tools/build/src/build\targets.jam:934: in targets.generate-from-reference from module targets C:/Build/src/boost_1_75_0/tools/build/src/build\targets.jam:1277: in generate-dependencies from modu le object(alias-target-class)@184 C:/Build/src/boost_1_75_0/tools/build/src/build\targets.jam:1334: in class(a)basic-target.generate fro m module object(alias-target-class)@184 C:/Build/src/boost_1_75_0/tools/build/src/build\targets.jam:812: in generate-really from module obje ct(main-target)@5196 C:/Build/src/boost_1_75_0/tools/build/src/build\targets.jam:784: in class(a)main-target.generate from module object(main-target)@5196 C:/Build/src/boost_1_75_0/tools/build/src/build\targets.jam:934: in targets.generate-from-reference from module targets C:/Build/src/boost_1_75_0/tools/build/src/build\targets.jam:1277: in generate-dependencies from modu le object(top-level-target)@190 C:/Build/src/boost_1_75_0/tools/build/src/build\targets.jam:1334: in alias-target-class.generate fro m module object(top-level-target)@190 C:/Build/src/boost_1_75_0\boostcpp.jam:403: in build-multiple from module object(top-level-target)@1 90 C:/Build/src/boost_1_75_0\boostcpp.jam:393: in class(a)top-level-target.generate from module object(to p-level-target)@190 C:/Build/src/boost_1_75_0/tools/build/src/build\targets.jam:812: in generate-really from module obje ct(main-target)@5198 C:/Build/src/boost_1_75_0/tools/build/src/build\targets.jam:784: in class(a)main-target.generate from module object(main-target)@5198 C:/Build/src/boost_1_75_0/tools/build/src/build\targets.jam:934: in targets.generate-from-reference from module targets C:/Build/src/boost_1_75_0/tools/build/src/build\targets.jam:1277: in generate-dependencies from modu le object(top-level-target)@191 C:/Build/src/boost_1_75_0/tools/build/src/build\targets.jam:1334: in alias-target-class.generate fro m module object(top-level-target)@191 C:/Build/src/boost_1_75_0\boostcpp.jam:403: in build-multiple from module object(top-level-target)@1 91 C:/Build/src/boost_1_75_0\boostcpp.jam:393: in class(a)top-level-target.generate from module object(to p-level-target)@191 C:/Build/src/boost_1_75_0/tools/build/src/build\targets.jam:812: in generate-really from module obje ct(main-target)@5199 C:/Build/src/boost_1_75_0/tools/build/src/build\targets.jam:784: in class(a)main-target.generate from module object(main-target)@5199 C:/Build/src/boost_1_75_0/tools/build/src/build\targets.jam:273: in class(a)project-target.generate fr om module object(project-target)@134 C:/Build/src/boost_1_75_0/tools/build/src\build-system.jam:797: in load from module build-system C:/Build/src/boost_1_75_0/tools/build/src/kernel\modules.jam:295: in import from module modules C:/Build/src/boost_1_75_0/tools/build/src/kernel/bootstrap.jam:139: in boost-build from module C:/Build/src/boost_1_75_0/boost-build.jam:17: in module scope from module

1 0

[release] Boost 1.75.0
by Marshall Clow 11 Dec '20

11 Dec '20

Release 1.54.0 of the Boost C++ Libraries is now available. These open-source libraries work well with the C++ Standard Library, and are usable across a broad spectrum of applications. The Boost license encourages both commercial and non-commercial use. This release contains 1 new library and numerous enhancements and bug fixes for existing libraries. For details, including download links, see <http://www.boost.org/users/news/version_1.75.0> You can also download directly from: <https://dl.bintray.com/boostorg/release/1.75.0/> To install this release on your system, see <http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/release/more/getting_started/index.html> Thanks to everyone who participated in this release. Thanks, -- The Boost Release Team Marshall Clow, Glen Fernandes, Michael Caisse

2 1

[release] 1.76.0 open for merging
by Marshall Clow 11 Dec '20

11 Dec '20

The master branch is open for merging all stable changes from develop, including bug fixes and major upgrades to existing libraries. Breaking changes should be coordinated via the mailing list with the developers of the other libraries affected. New libraries may be added, but require permission of a release manager. In other words, merging does not require permission from a release manager, except for new libraries. Boost Calendar with the release schedule: http://www.boost.org/development/index.html <http://www.boost.org/development/index.html> Release schedule explanation: https://github.com/boostorg/wiki/wiki/Releases%3A-Schedule <https://github.com/boostorg/wiki/wiki/Releases%3A-Schedule> Release practices for developers: http://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/wiki/ImprovingPractices <http://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/wiki/ImprovingPractices> -- The Boost Release Team

2 1

The new Boost 17.0.0
by Antony Polukhin 10 Dec '20

10 Dec '20

Hi, == The problem. TL;DR: we are having huge troubles with usability and popularity! Quite a lot of companies forbid using Boost because: * it provides vocabulary types, that should be the same across the whole project (like shared_ptr, filesystem::path or optional). Otherwise it's hard to combine different APIs * it is huge, in consists of legacy on more than a half, with a lot of dependencies between libraries. This is extremely painful for big companies, because there's no efficient distributed build system. Each company invents it's own and/or tries to minimize headers by all means. New companies (startups) also avoid Boost: * "We are using C++17, we do not want legacy libraries with C++98 support" * Junior developers are confused by multiple vocabulary types. "Should we use boost::optional or std::optional?" * hard to upgrade, because symbols are not versioned ISO C++ WG21 community not willing to push prototypes into Boost. "We aim to establish "existing practice" and provide reference implementations so that Boost libraries are suitable for eventual standardization." - that's not really true any more. == The Solution TL;DR: we need a C++17 fork of Boost with close to 0 dependencies between libraries and namespace versioning. С++17 provides many vocabulary types, feature test macro and a bunch of features for variadic templates. All of that allows us to drop a lot of weight and fix majority of popularity and usability problems. Rule of a thumb should be: "If the C++17 provides that functionality - use the standard version". That approach would allow to loose a lot of weight, do not mess with vocabulary types and significantly reduce dependencies https://pdimov.github.io/boostdep-report/master/module-levels.html By levels: config 0 -> we probably would not need it any more assert 1 -> 0 core 2 -> 1 (or 0 if we merge it with asser) smart_ptr 4 -> 2 exception 5 -> 2 stacktrace 5 -> 2 intrusive 5 -> 2 outcome 6 -> 3 container 6 -> 3 gil 11 -> 2? context 16 -> 2? dll 17 -> 1 asio 18 -> 3? beast 19 -> 4? == The Path TL;DR: we should start the Boost17 now and ship it as we are ready. Old Boost should be still available. The new approach requires quite a lot of effort and not all the maintainers have enough time to do the migration. We should keep releasing the existing Boost, while migrating the libraries to the Boost17. The migration is not as hard as it seems. It took 2 or 3 days to make Boost.DLL work with either boost or std filesystem. It could be done in less than a day, if I do not have to support the Boost filesystem. == Action points 0) Discuss 1) Bury the idea, wait for a few years, goto 0); or make a boost17 repo with the same layout as the existing one, but without submodules 2) start the migration -- Best regards, Antony Polukhin

28 120

[release] Master branch now closed for 1.75.0 release
by Marshall Clow 09 Dec '20

09 Dec '20

3 5

qvm: return type for mixed scalar type vector operations
by Kai Szuttor 09 Dec '20

09 Dec '20

Hey all, concerning vector operations in boost qvm, is it possible to somehow specify the return type of a binary operator with mixed scalar input data, e.g. operator+(vec<double, 3>, vec<int, 3>) ? Could not find the customisation point to do this depending on the involved operation. Thanks in advance, Kai

2 2

Re: [boost] Boost Digest, Vol 6513, Issue 3
by Brian Wood 07 Dec '20

07 Dec '20

Peter Dimov writes: > Marshall Clow wrote: > > > I must concur with Ville here; I have had several people tell me they > won?t > > use Boost because ?it changes with every release?. > > Boost does change with every release, and I still keep using 1.38 in > several > projects of mine, but these changes are not limited to ABI at all. > Everything changes, you have to retest the whole lot, for correctness as > well as performance. > > And in general, expecting ABI stability from a collection of predominantly > header-only libraries is setting one up for severe disappointment. > > The standardized libraries are more header-only than Boost so am not sure how this isn't a rap on them also. Somehow C++ has become successful in spite of this. Brian Ebenezer Enterprises - In G-d we trust. https://github.com/Ebenezer-group/onwards

3 2

[SmartPtr] intrusive_ref_counter CounterPolicyT requirements API?
by Billy 05 Dec '20

05 Dec '20

Hi Boost, We're considering implementing our own atomic ref count for `intrusive_ref_count` [*]. A question came up. Is the `CounterPolicyT` template parameter a stable extension hook, or are users expected to strictly stick to the two provided policies of `thread_unsafe_counter` and `thread_safe_counter`? I can see that under the hood, these policy structs are trivially simple and we can just do it, but the question is really about whether the lack of documentation implies that it's a private boost detail. From https://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_74_0/libs/smart_ptr/doc/html/smart_ptr.htm… "The second parameter is a policy that defines the nature of the reference counter. The library provides two such policies: thread_unsafe_counter and thread_safe_counter." Thanks for your time, Billy Donahue [*] Incidentally we want to increment with memory order relaxed instead of acq_rel. -- ǝnɥɐuop ʎllıq

3 4