May 2023 - Boost - lists.boost.org

Re: [boost] Determine socket is ipv4 or ipv6
by Gavin Lambert 16 May '23

16 May '23

On 16/05/2023 15:26, Tarun Batra wrote: > I have a code something like this: > > TcpConnection::pointer my_conn = GetConn(req); > > tcp::socket& my_socket = my_conn->getSocket(); > > tcp::resolver my_resolver(my_socket.get_executor()); > > > Is it possible to check if the my_socket is ipv4 socket or ipv6 socket? That depends exactly what you mean by that, but you're likely looking for something like: my_socket.remote_endpoint().address().is_v6() Doxygen doesn't do a very good job at navigating the type templates involved here; using your IDE's code completion is more successful.

1 0

Reference section of Boost.Any leads to Boost.PFR
by Antony Polukhin 15 May '23

15 May '23

Hi, Just noted that clicking on "->" arrow at the developer preview of Boost.Any https://www.boost.org/doc/libs/develop/doc/html/any/ValueType.html leads to Boost.PFR reference section. No idea how is that possible. I'd appreciate help

1 0

boost 1.82.0
by Prabhakar Bhatt 15 May '23

15 May '23

Hi All, Recently we upgraded to Boost 1.82.0. We compiled the boost as : ./bootstrap.sh --with-libraries=filesystem,system,program_options,iostreams,log,regex,stacktrace,thread --without-icu When we tried to use the regex library and build Avro product we are getting following error: Boost/boost_1_82_0/include/boost/regex/v4/cpp_regex_traits.hpp:1117: undefined reference to `boost::scoped_static_mutex_lock::scoped_static_mutex_lock(boost::static_mutex&, bool)' Please can you help us in addressing the issue. Thanks and Regards, Prabhakar

1 0

Determine socket is ipv4 or ipv6
by Tarun Batra 14 May '23

14 May '23

Hi, I have a code something like this: TcpConnection::pointer my_conn = GetConn(req); tcp::socket& my_socket = my_conn->getSocket(); tcp::resolver my_resolver(my_socket.get_executor()); Is it possible to check if the my_socket is ipv4 socket or ipv6 socket?

1 0

Re: [boost] BOOST 1.82.0 with c++17
by Vinnie Falco 13 May '23

13 May '23

On Sat, May 13, 2023 at 5:52 AM Daggumati, Rajesh via Boost <boost(a)lists.boost.org> wrote: > Does boost 1.82.0 compatible with C++ 17 compiler? Check the bottom of this page: https://www.boost.org/users/history/version_1_82_0.html Thanks

1 0

BOOST 1.82.0 with c++17
by Daggumati, Rajesh 13 May '23

13 May '23

Hi Team, As per project requirement , we are going to upgrade to BOOST(1.82.0) and Qt(6.5 LTS) in our project. QT 6.5 LTS needs C++ 17 compiler. Does boost 1.82.0 compatible with C++ 17 compiler? Kindly please let us know your response. Regards, Rajesh D Confidential - Company Proprietary Please be advised that this email may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us by email by replying to the sender and delete this message. The sender disclaims that the content of this email constitutes an offer to enter into, or the acceptance of, any agreement; provided that the foregoing does not invalidate the binding effect of any digital or other electronic reproduction of a manual signature that is included in any attachment.

1 0

Please remove me from this list
by Vitaly Budovski 13 May '23

13 May '23

The web and email unsubscribe methods do not seem to work.

1 0

Version of RapidXml used in boost
by Kacvinsky, Tom 13 May '23

13 May '23

Hi, I am trying to track down with version of RapidXml is used in Boost 1.78.0. I don't have a problem with the RapidXml license attribution, but I do need to know the specific version of it that is used in Boost for our attribution purposes (copyright year and version). >From what I can see from a git blame, RapidXml was added to Boost around 2007 by the author of RapidXml (Marcin). Does anyone have idea which version is used in Boost? Thanks, Tom

1 0

Re: [boost] New Website !
by Ion Gaztañaga 13 May '23

13 May '23

On 11/05/2023 21:47, Vinnie Falco via Boost wrote: > On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 11:36 AM Ion Gaztañaga via Boost > <boost(a)lists.boost.org> wrote: >> The release notes page seems hard to parse, though: >> >> https://www.boost.revsys.dev/releases/ > > Ahem... well, would you believe that me and Greg pulled that one out > from scratch from our collective arse just hours before the > announcement? > > In other words, it is a placeholder / design sketch. It will get a > proper treatment shortly (and be actually hooked up to the database by > the talented Lacey). Great! Ion

1 0

Re: [boost] charconv for C++11
by Matt Borland 12 May '23

12 May '23

> > Here's my full test case, built with VS 2022 17.6 Preview 7 x64 (note that x64 vs. x86 makes a HUGE difference to charconv). I didn't bother to compare the from_chars scenario (as MSVC doesn't use a highly optimized algorithm there; investigating Eisel-Lemire is on our todo list). > > Hope this helps, > STL > Stephan, Thank you for this. I can add benchmarks for Lemire’s algorithm vs. the current MSVC STL from_chars to see if it’s worth pursuing for your team. Matt

2 1