- Boost - lists.boost.org

Re:Re: [boost] Re: serialization:question regarding test
by Robert Ramey 26 Jul '04

26 Jul '04

Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote: >Robert Ramey writes: >> I don't see that this should be a problem. Just follow the instructions in >> the release notes: >> >> a) Download spirit 1.61 from SourceForge.net to a local directory. On my >> machine its c:/spirit161 >> >> b) Define (export) environmental variable SPIRIT_ROOT=c:/spirit161. >> >> The build/test jamfile set up is sensitive to the SPIRIT_ROOT >> variable and will put it in the include path for those systems that >> are known to require it. Right not that is msvc 6.0 and all tested >> borland compilers. Other compilers just work with the latest >> version of spirit from the CVS Tree. This works on my system >> without any other special adjustments other than the above. So I'm >> asking that the testers set up their environment as above before >> running the tests. I don't think that's an unreasonable request. >It's not unreasonable. However, before we do that, we at least need to >figure out how to indicate in the reports that the MSVC 6.0 results >are in fact produced by compiling against something else than the >main trunk. This kind of mark-up is not currently supported and would >require a bit of coding that I'm afraid we don't have resources for at >the moment. This is explained in the serialization documentation. I wouldn't think this is interesting for the notes markup. I don't see that the above issue has any relationship at all with the question of notes markup. Regarding markup. As far as I can tell, there is no simple way to specify a note that a applies to all tests for a given toolset. E.G. All serialization tests that depend upon wide character i/o under gcc/cygwin as wide char i/o isn't supported there. E.G. All tests which depend up export on borland compilers fail. E.G. All tests for msvc which use more than one archive class in the same code module fail. These issues are addressed in the library documentation. I don't see an easy way to fit them into the notes system. Robert Ramey

3 5

[test] regression with latest change to libs/test/src/test_tools.cpp
by JOAQUIN LOPEZ MU?Z 26 Jul '04

26 Jul '04

FYI, latest changes to the aforementioned file seem to break things for msvc-stlport, as shown for instance at: http://tinyurl.com/6br7t [format] http://tinyurl.com/6xt58 [minmax] http://tinyurl.com/48hd6 [multi_index] Joaquín M´López Muñoz Telefónica, Investigación y Desarrollo

3 2

Re: [boost] Re: [test] regression with latest change tolibs/test/src/test_tools.cpp
by JOAQUIN LOPEZ MU?Z 26 Jul '04

26 Jul '04

----- Mensaje original ----- De: "Victor A. Wagner Jr." <vawjr(a)rudbek.com> Fecha: Domingo, Julio 25, 2004 11:54 pm Asunto: Re: [boost] Re: [test] regression with latest change tolibs/test/src/test_tools.cpp [...] > Also, I now have the vc8.0 beta and would be happy to add those > to my > testing if I only knew how to go about adding a toolset. Any > assistance > would be greatly appreciated. > Aleksey explains the procedure at: http://www.meta-comm.com/engineering/regression_setup/instructions.html Good luck, Joaquín M López Muñoz Telefónica, Investigación y Desarrollo

2 1

run-fail on non-Wondows platforms
by Gennadiy Rozental 25 Jul '04

25 Jul '04

What up with subject? Why all Boost.Test unit tests fail? Gennadiy.

1 0

WARNING: many changed files...
by Rene Rivera 25 Jul '04

25 Jul '04

I just finished cleaning up *all* occurrences of TABS and END-OF-LINE problems. Your next update will contain many file changes (all whitespace). And *PLEASE* to not introduce more of these errors. It's somewhat of a pain to fix the TAB errors :-( -- -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com -- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com - 102708583/icq

1 0

Iterator lib missing copyrights
by John Maddock 25 Jul '04

25 Jul '04

The following files have no copyright info, can the owners please fix? boost/iterator/detail/categories.hpp boost/iterator/new_iterator_tests.hpp libs/iterator/example/permutation_iterator_example.cpp libs/iterator/example/reverse_iterator.cpp libs/iterator/test/is_convertible_fail.cpp libs/iterator/test/iterator_adaptor_cc.cpp libs/iterator/test/lvalue_concept_fail_expected.cpp Many thanks, John Maddock.

2 1

CW9 results
by Stefan Slapeta 25 Jul '04

25 Jul '04

I think Aleksey forgot to mention: my CW column is for CW 9. I didn't have the time yet to investigate much but the results are quite common with the CW 8 results. However, the first dynamic_bitset test produces an ICE on CW9! Also the results for program_options seem to be interesting. Stefan

4 5

Re: [boost] [Important For All Boost Contributors][multi_index] BSL Status Update
by JOAQUIN LOPEZ MU?Z 25 Jul '04

25 Jul '04

----- Mensaje original ----- De: "Stephan T. Lavavej" <stl(a)nuwen.net> Fecha: Domingo, Julio 25, 2004 3:47 am Asunto: [boost] [Important For All Boost Contributors] BSL Status Update [...] > > * I know I've seen the following people post to the Boost list > recently. They should be contacted about adding themselves to > blanket-permission.txt. > > Joaquín Mª López Muñoz This is me. Wrt to the license status of Boost.MultiIndex, * All files that appear under "Files With No Recognisable Licence" do have a BSL License and a proper (c). Is the wording wrong, or is it the bot's fault? Could anyone take a look please? Thanx. * There are a couple of trivial files without (c) or license, I'll have them fixed tomorrow. * The following files boost/multi_index/detail/ord_index_node.hpp boost/multi_index/detail/ord_index_ops.hpp boost/multi_index/ordered_index.hpp have portions based on SGI STL source code, but IMHO they have underwent enough rewriting so that the SGL license does not longer apply to them. The original SGL text appears (after BSL text) as a courtesy only. Could any expert give advice on this? Do those files really retain SGL license? Joaquín M López Muñoz Telefónica, Investigación y Desarrollo

1 0

Graph lib files with no copyright/licence
by John Maddock 25 Jul '04

25 Jul '04

The following graph lib files have no copyright or licence declaration, can the owners (Jeremy?) please fix? libs/graph/example/adjacency_list_io.cpp libs/graph/example/graph_property.cpp libs/graph/example/iohb.c libs/graph/example/iohb.h libs/graph/example/subgraph_properties.cpp libs/graph/src/graphviz_digraph_parser.hpp libs/graph/src/graphviz_graph_parser.hpp libs/graph/src/yystype.h libs/graph/test/bellman-test.cpp libs/graph/test/bidir_remove_edge.cpp libs/graph/test/subgraph.cpp libs/graph/test/transitive_closure_test2.cpp Many thanks, John Maddock.

1 0

"Pending" files have no copyright
by John Maddock 25 Jul '04

25 Jul '04

The following files in boost/pending have no copyright, there is a wider issue about what we should do with these files, but for now I'd just like to fix the licence issue. It looks like these are Jeremy Siek's work, is that correct? boost/pending/container_traits.hpp boost/pending/cstddef.hpp boost/pending/detail/disjoint_sets.hpp boost/pending/detail/property.hpp boost/pending/fenced_priority_queue.hpp boost/pending/fibonacci_heap.hpp boost/pending/property.hpp boost/pending/queue.hpp boost/pending/stringtok.hpp Thanks, John Maddock

1 0