- Boost - lists.boost.org

[website] redesign and content
by David Abrahams 28 Mar '06

28 Mar '06

Has anyone seen http://beta.python.org/ recently? Aside from minor details I think it's a wonderful design. And the content! Unbelievably great promotional material. Just look at some of the subtopics of http://beta.python.org/about. It would be great to have something like that for Boost. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com

7 16

Re: [boost] argument ignore facility
by Daniel Wallin 28 Mar '06

28 Mar '06

Gennadiy Rozental wrote: > Hi, > > Maybe somebody could point me into right direction. boost::bind allows to > present function of arity N as function of arity M with M<N, by binding some > particular arguments. I need reverse: I need to present function of arity N > as function of arity M with M > N, by ignoring some arguments. > > What is recommended to be used? boost::bind can be invoked with any arity and will ignore arguments that are not used. void f(int); bind(&f, _1)(x,y,z,u); // invokes f(x) -- Daniel Wallin

2 1

New implementation of remove_xxx for vintage compilers
by Peder Holt 28 Mar '06

28 Mar '06

Hi. I have started implementing some of the missing type_traits functionality for vintage compilers using typeof. The following are complete, and seem to work flawlessly on VC 6.5 and 7.0: remove_pointer remove_reference remove_bounds The source is available at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/boost/files/typeof_vintage.zip The use of typeof in this respect, makes remove_xxx much more flexible. Would it be possible to start using this scheme for compilers without partial template specialization support? #define BOOST_MAX_TYPEOF_SIZE 20 #include <boost/test/minimal.hpp> //Include typeof_define.hpp in all header files where new types are added to typeof. #include <boost/typeof/typeof_define.hpp> #include <complex> #include <boost/type_traits/remove_reference.hpp> #include <boost/type_traits/remove_pointer.hpp> #include <boost/type_traits/remove_bounds.hpp> #include <boost/type_traits/is_same.hpp> template<typename A0> struct X {}; template<typename A0,unsigned int A1> struct Y {}; template<typename A0,typename A1,long A2> struct Z {}; BOOST_TYPEOF_DEFINE_TEMPLATE(X,1,(typename)) BOOST_TYPEOF_DEFINE_TEMPLATE(Y,2,(typename,unsigned int)) BOOST_TYPEOF_DEFINE_TEMPLATE(Z,3,(typename,typename,long)) BOOST_TYPEOF_DEFINE_TEMPLATE(std::complex,1,(typename)) int test_main(int, char*[]) { BOOST_TEST((boost::is_same<X<int>* const[8][9],boost::remove_bounds<X<int>* const[5][8][9]>::type>::value)); BOOST_TEST((boost::is_same<Z<X<double&>,Y<bool[4][7],12324>,0>* const*,boost::remove_pointer<Z<X<double&>,Y<bool[4][7],12324>,0>* const**volatile>::type>::value)); //VC7.1 fails to compile remove_reference. BOOST_TEST((boost::is_same<Y<int,345>** const,boost::remove_reference<Y<int,345>** const&>::type>::value)); typedef BOOST_TYPEOF(5.+std::complex<double>(6,7)) result_type; BOOST_TEST((boost::is_same<result_type,std::complex<double> >::value)); return 0; } -- Peder Holt

8 29

[asio] File AIO(win32) and "Overlapped I/O operation is in progress" error
by Felipe Magno de Almeida 28 Mar '06

28 Mar '06

Hi, I'm implementing file AIO in asio for windows. I've tried to use as much as possible from asio. The problem is that when reading bigger files (more than one megabyte), the queue returns an error: code 997, that is converted to "Overlapped I/O operation is in progress." When that happens, the asio deletes the handler, but the operation is still happening, so GetQueuedCompletionStatus returns one more time for the same overlapped with the completed IO, but the handler is already deleted. This happens in: handler_operation::do_completion_impl (win_iocp_demuxer_service:169) It holds a std::auto_ptr to the handler, but has no access to the error code. So I cant see how to correct this. I think that socket AIO could return this too (specially in ConnectEx, I've seen this in my own "raw AIO" code). I havent finished the file aio yet, when it gets a little better I'll publish here (probably this weekend). Thanks, -- Felipe Magno de Almeida

2 3

c2_functions first submission materials uploaded with cleanups
by Marcus Mendenhall 27 Mar '06

27 Mar '06

After much more useful discussion on the list I have uploaded c2_functions_boost_prelim.20060325b.zip to the file vault. It contains the code for c2_functions (header & source), an html folder with Doxygen documentation, and a white paper describing the theory of this package. Anyone who is interested, look over this and let me know how the group wishes to proceed. It adds a lot to the main documentation page, including use cases. Obviously still preliminary, but at least there is a roadmap now. Marcus Mendenhall

2 1

[program_options] parse_command_line
by David Greene 27 Mar '06

27 Mar '06

Is there a specific reason that parse_command_line has this signature? template<typename charT> basic_parsed_options< charT > parse_command_line(int argc, charT * argv, ^^^^^^^ Should this be charT **? const options_description & , int style = 0, function1< std::pair< std::string, std::string >, const std::string & > ext = ext_parser()); This makes parsing nested options (i.e. --param="some more options") unnecessarily difficult. It would be easier if it looked like this: template<typename Int, typename Buf> basic_parsed_options< charT > parse_command_line(Int argc, Buf argv, const options_description & , int style = 0, function1< std::pair< std::string, std::string >, const std::string & > ext = ext_parser()); This way I can use the boost string algorithms to tokenize the suboption string and pass it into another invocation of parse_command_line. Thoughts? Complaints? Smacks upside the head? -Dave

1 0

interest on a geometry library
by rodolfo＠rodsoft.org 27 Mar '06

27 Mar '06

Hi, is there any interest on a geomery library? It has primitives like point, rectangle, circle, triangle, polygon, and functions that operates on them like intersect, union, test if a point is inside, etc. I have some classes that I've built to use in my projects and would like to get it into boost, for everyone's profit. Sorry if there's already another library trying to get into boost with these characteristics. At least I didn't find it in the sandbox. Regards, Rodolfo Lima _______________________________________________________ Yahoo! Acesso Gr�tis - Internet r�pida e gr�tis. Instale o discador agora! http://br.acesso.yahoo.com

16 56

Re: [boost] argument ignore facility
by Peter Dimov 27 Mar '06

27 Mar '06

Gennadiy Rozental wrote: > Hi, > > Maybe somebody could point me into right direction. boost::bind > allows to present function of arity N as function of arity M with > M<N, by binding some particular arguments. I need reverse: I need to > present function of arity N as function of arity M with M > N, by > ignoring some arguments. > > What is recommended to be used? boost::bind.

1 0

Using Boost Test
by George Russell 27 Mar '06

27 Mar '06

Hi, We're currently using boost::test in one of our projects. I'm seing a difference in behaviour between unittests compiled on two different machines. On one machine, the unittests run to completion, reporting failure(s) and fatal errors when accessing invalid memory. On the other, the unittests stop execution on the first fatal error. They also dump details of memory leaks. It's the same code, compiled in the same way. Can someone explain why this is? Thanks, George Russell

2 1

Re: [boost] Serious problem with gcc 4 on Mac OS X, when using boost:shared_ptr
by Ananda Tallur 27 Mar '06

27 Mar '06

Peter Dimov Wrote: > Ananda Tallur wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Originally, I had discovered a problem when using > > boost::unit_test_framework, for which I have already posted. > > But, by further analysing the problem, I could come out to a simple > > program, using only boost shared pointers, and which fails : > > -> on Mac OS X 10.4 > > -> when compiled with gcc 4.0.1 (coming with XCode 2.2.1), or gcc 4.1 > > (delivered by darwin ports) > > -> with optimisations : at least -O, or -O1, or -O2,etc... It works > > correctly with -O0 > > -> using either boost 1.33.1, 1.33.0, or 1.32.0 > > > > Below is the sample test program : > > > > --- macosx_gcc4problem.cpp --- > > [...] > > This issue has already been reported, along with a fix, by Howard Hinnant: > > http://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2006/03/102088.php > http://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2006/03/102122.php > http://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2006/03/102134.php > > and the upcoming 1.34 release will no longer suffer from it. > > Thank you very much for taking the time to simplify the failing example. > I've reformatted it a bit as a test case. If you verify that it still fails > for you, I'll include it in the regression tests. > > > > #include <boost/shared_ptr.hpp> > #include <boost/detail/lightweight_test.hpp> > > struct A > { > int value; > }; > > struct B > { > B( boost::shared_ptr<A> val ): a( val ) {} > > boost::shared_ptr<A> a; > }; > > struct C > { > C( B val ): b( val ) {} > > B b; > }; > > struct D > { > D( C val ): c( val ) {} > > C c; > }; > > D create() > { > boost::shared_ptr <A> a( new A ); > > a->value = 12345; > > return D( C( B( a ) ) ); > } > > int main() > { > D d = create(); > > BOOST_TEST( d.c.b.a->value == 12345 ); > > return boost::report_errors(); > } Hello Peter, Thank you very much, this is very good news to know that the problem has already been fixed ! I have checked the reformatted test program just above, and confirm that : - It does not work for me (gcc 4.0.1 on Mac OS X, ppc G5), when compiled with optimization. - Once patched the file sp_counted_base_gcc_ppc.hpp including modifications from cvs, the problem disappears, and the test passes with success, with or without optimization. So the test program does its job, Thank you again Anand

4 3