- Boost - lists.boost.org

Median in Boost.Accumulators
by Lakshay Garg 30 Sep '18

30 Sep '18

Hello Boost Some time ago, I needed to compute the exact median for a stream of elements and after using Boost.Accumulators, realized that it only provides an approximation of the median and not the exact number. I rolled up my custom implementation of the algorithm and used it for my project. I wanted to check if people on this list might be interested in such an implementation for Boost.Accumulators in which case I can try to adapt my implementation and send a PR. Performance characteristics: For a stream of n numbers, the memory required is O(n). Median can be queried at any point of time in O(1) and adding all the elements costs O(nlog(n)) Lakshay

3 5

Will boost support DTLS / UDP?
by jupiter 29 Sep '18

29 Sep '18

It seems to me that Boost does not support DTLS so far, any plan and time line for boost to support DTLS?

2 1

CMake in Boost
by Robert Ramey 29 Sep '18

29 Sep '18

Many have expressed the desire that Boost support CMake. The Boost Board of Directors has emitted some sort of resolution to this effect - it's been a year. I would like to see progress in this direction. To this end I propose the following: a) Boost announce that a review of proposals to incorporate CMake into boost will be held in January 2019. This will follow customary Boost practices. b) Those who are willing and able to submit code/documentation and whatever else in necessary should do so before this date. I would anticipate at least two such submissions. As is the case with other reviews, I would not exist such submissions to be totally complete. But I would expect that they include enough for reviewers to test and practice with the proposed system. c) Prior to this discussions can be held on the list regarding the scope of such an effort. The review manager will distill these discussions to a statement of scope. This will be posted around 30 October 2018. I nominate myself (Robert Ramey) as review manager in this instance. Why would I do this? a) Boost needs this b) I've never been a review manager c) I'm a masochistic idiot. Robert Ramey

4 8

[test] How to execute shell commands
by Mike Dev 28 Sep '18

28 Sep '18

Does the boost unit test frame work provide a way to write a test that executes a couple of shell commands? Specifically, I want to write a test that compiles a cmake project: https://github.com/boostorg/vmd/pull/4 https://github.com/boostorg/preprocessor/pull/20 what I need to do for that is essentially (on Linux): - mkdir <build_dir> - cd <build_dir> - cmake <source_dir> - cmake --build . Of course I can write a cpp program that uses std::system to execute those commands but I was wondering if there was a more direct way to do it. Best Mike

5 7

contract work
by Ggh 28 Sep '18

28 Sep '18

Hi, Sorry to pollute but: Available for contract work, code samples here: http://www.multi.fi/~ghaga/bak1 Cheers Greg

2 1

stufff
by Ggh 28 Sep '18

28 Sep '18

I don't know what I am up to: http://www.multi.fi/~ghaga/bak1/ http://www.multi.fi/~ghaga/ Thank you, Greg

1 0

Re: [boost] [cmake] Pull request announcement
by Bjorn Reese 28 Sep '18

28 Sep '18

On 09/14/18 13:44, Mike Dev via Boost wrote: > This will not address > - Testing [...] > In short: all the difficult stuff is left out ;) > The goal is not to present a solution that can replace b2 but to have > a minimal starting point upon which individual library authors or the > community as a whole can make iterative improvements. If and when BCM > (or an alternative) is accepted into boost, individual libraries can > then easily switch to this full-fledged solution and of course any > author can create a more complete CMake solution for his library at > any time (as some already have). In my experience, we want to have both an integration and standalone CMake file. This split is necessary to avoid problems with multiple instances of enable_testing() when using one library from another. * The integration file builds only what is necessary for integration into other projects. This is similar to what you are proposing. * The standalone file builds everything including test and documentation. This reuses the integration file to build the library itself. If we place your proposed CMake file in the library root, and dependent libraries start using that location, then it becomes difficult to later have the standalone CMake file in the library root, which is the more natural choice. So we should be cautious about where we place these files.

22 91

Formal Review of Proposed Boost.Histogram Library Starts TODAY
by Mateusz Loskot 27 Sep '18

27 Sep '18

Dear Boost Community, The formal review of Hans Dembinski's Histogram library starts TODAY, the September 17th, and lasts until September 26th, unless an extension occurs. =========== What is it? =========== Histogram is a header-only C++11 library, provides multi-dimensional histogram template class for counting, statistics and data exploration. The histogram class interface has been carefully designed to make the library * offer simple and convenient default behaviour * easy to learn and safe to use * convenient to use for one- as well as multi-dimensional analysis * compatible with STL algorithms * dependant only on C++11 standard library and optionally on Boost The author followed the "Don't pay for what you don't use" principle. The histogram class is customisable through policy classes, but the default policies were carefully crafted so that most users do not need to customize anything. The default policies guarantee the histogram to be safe to use as a black box, memory efficient, and very fast, where safety is related to overflow prevention and large values capping. This guarantees is one of unique features of the library in comparison to other implementations. The histogram class comes in two variants, which share a common interface: * static variant is optimised at compile-time to provide maximum performance, at the cost of reduced runtime flexibility and potentially larger executables; * dynamic variant is a bit slower, but configurable at run-time. Both variants of the histogram class provide optional serialization support implemented with Boost.Serialization. The library itself is header-only and the tests as well as examples can be built using both, Boost.Build and CMake. There are no dependencies required other than C++11 compiler. Optional dependencies include the GNU Scientific Library (GSL) and the ROOT framework from CERN which are needed the corresponding speed test programs used for performance comparison. A note on history: The library was first announced to the Boost community in May, 2016 [1] and the author received extensive feedback. Then, after a year of work posted second request for comments in April, 2017 [2]. =================== Getting the library =================== Checkout the `master` branch from the library git repository: https://github.com/HDembinski/histogram/ NOTE: The author follows the library submission process [3]: the master branch remains frozen for the period of the formal review, modifications in response to feedback should go to `develop` branch and big items may be worked and discussed via opening an issue on GitHub. Documentation: http://hdembinski.github.io/histogram/doc/html/ Website: http://hdembinski.github.io/histogram/ ================ Writing a review ================ Please, follow the official Boost formal review procedure [4]. If you feel this is an interesting library, then please submit your review to the Boost developer list (preferably), or the review manager to mateusz (at) loskot (dot) net. Here are some questions you might want to answer in your review: - What is your evaluation of the design? - What is your evaluation of the implementation? - What is your evaluation of the documentation? - What is your evaluation of the potential usefulness of the library? - Did you try to use the library? With what compiler? Did you have any problems? - How much effort did you put into your evaluation? A glance? A quick reading? In-depth study? - Are you knowledgeable about the problem domain? And finally, every review should answer this question: - Do you think the library should be accepted as a Boost library? Be sure to say this explicitly so that your other comments don't obscure your overall opinion. If needed, refer to the Boost Library Requirements and Guidelines [5]. Please, give constructive criticism! [1] https://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2016/05/229389.php [2] https://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2017/04/234410.php [3] https://www.boost.org/development/submissions.html#Review [4] https://www.boost.org/community/reviews.html [5] https://www.boost.org/development/requirements.html Mateusz Review Manager for the proposed Boost.Histogram -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net

7 54

[GitHelp] release version of boost from GitHub?
by Kostiantyn Ponomarenko 26 Sep '18

26 Sep '18

Hi, guys. What is the right place for getting the last/or-any (released) version of boost? This page provides the last release as well as others: https://www.boost.org. But I've got the impression that after Boost moved to GitHub and became "modular", the releases can be downloaded right from the GitHub "releases" page. So it looks like it is not the case, and my assumptions is wrong because when I go to the "releases" page on GitHub (https://github.com/boostorg/boost/releases) and download a release (let's say "boost-1.68.0") I don't get any libs inside. Could you please help me to understand this situation. Is the only place to get a release of boost is https://www.boost.org, but not GitHub? Is GitHub used only for development, or getting the latest changes which are not released yet? --- Kostia Kyiv, Ukraine

3 3

Formal Review of Proposed Boost.Histogram Library - LAST DAY
by Mateusz Loskot 26 Sep '18

26 Sep '18

Dear Boost Community, According to the review schedule, the formal review of Hans Dembinski's Histogram library lasts until the end of TODAY. Please, anyone who is aiming to post a review, hurry up! If there are members who have planned to post a review and still wish to do it but require more time, please speak up now indicating how much time you'd need. [1] https://www.boost.org/community/review_schedule.html Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net

1 0