- Boost - lists.boost.org

ATTN: Branch for release completed
by Aleksey Gurtovoy 20 Oct '04

20 Oct '04

Per our standard conventions, the branch tag is "RC_1_32_0", and the main trunk state from which the branch was performed is tagged as "merged_to_RC_1_32_0". Please see http://www.boost.org/more/release_procedures.htm#Developers for a detailed procedure for merging fixes between the branch and the main trunk. To regression runners using "regression.py" driver: to switch the tests to run on the branch, you need to specify the branch name in the script's command line using the '--tag': python regression.py --tag=RC_1_32_0 ... -- Aleksey Gurtovoy MetaCommunications Engineering

2 1

ATTN: Branch for release starts in 10 minutes
by Aleksey Gurtovoy 20 Oct '04

20 Oct '04

Please do not check in anything into the main trunk until further notice. -- Aleksey Gurtovoy MetaCommunications Engineering

1 0

Re:Re: [boost] Re: serialization - build shared libs
by Robert Ramey 20 Oct '04

20 Oct '04

Martin Ecker wrote: >Neal Becker wrote: >> Is this perhaps a MS-windows specific problem? I did build a shared lib >> (using scons, I haven't learned jam yet), and AFAICT it is working, on >> Linux. >I'm pretty sure you will also run into problems with shared objects >under Linux. The problem is that certain global variables (e.g. for >the type registry) are defined as static member variables in header >files. Under Windows, if two different DLLs include this header file, >you will get two different copies of that static member variable - one >in each DLL - although there should only be one. Maybe the linker >under Linux is smart enough to resolve such issues. >Have you tried to serialize a class defined in one shared object > (which is registered in the type registry via BOOST_CLASS_EXPORT) from >code in another shared object? That's when you might run into >problems. You definitely will under Windows. >You might also run into problems when you dynamically (i.e. explicitly >in your code via dlopen) load a shared object, which contains classes >that use BOOST_CLASS_EXPORT to register themselves. Again, under >Windows you definitely will. I think there is a little confusion here about what it means to build the serialization library as a Shared Library or DLL. a) if you mean creating libraries which contain exactly the same functionality as libboost_serialiation.lib and libboost_wseralization.lib then there should be no problem as far as I know. Note that you might have problems if you loading/unloading the shared libraries multiple times under program control. I'm not sure. I haven't tested this and have left it for latter. Mainly this is because it should use the ABI autolink to be line with other boost libraries and work better for users. b) if you creating DLLS which instantiate serialization templates for specific classes - then you most likely have problems. There are still some issues pending. Martin has jumped ahead and addressed these issues for his application and most of his additions will likely eventually find their way into the serialization library in some form. Robert Ramey

4 16

[fsm] New release
by Andreas Huber 19 Oct '04

19 Oct '04

Dear Boosters I've finally managed to address the main issues that were raised in the last discussion on boost::fsm (exit() and BOOST_FSM_RELAX_TRANSITION_CONTEXT). Code and documentation should now be reasonably close to what will undergo the formal review. The only thing that is still lacking are proper tests, which I'll try to implement in the next few weeks. The .zip can be found here: http://boost-sandbox.sf.net/fsm.zip The docs are also available online: http://boost-sandbox.sf.net/libs/fsm As always: Feedback is highly welcome. Thanks & Regards, -- Andreas Huber When replying by private email, please remove the words spam and trap from the address shown in the header.

1 0

RE: [boost] Re: Any interest in adding unicode support to boost?
by Bennett, Patrick 19 Oct '04

19 Oct '04

> On Behalf Of Erik Wien > Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 11:09 AM > To: boost(a)lists.boost.org > Subject: [boost] Re: Any interest in adding unicode support to boost? > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Patrick Bennett" <patrick.bennett(a)inin.com> > > > Erik, be sure to take a look at IBM's open-source ICU library: > > http://oss.software.ibm.com/icu/ > > I have looked at the ICU library, and it's a very good unicode > implementation, but the goal of my project will be to create a library > that is in a form that could be standardized in boost, and from what > have seen/read, ICU is not really suited for that. [Bennett, Patrick] Agreed. I just wanted to make sure you took a look at it, minimally, as a guide or reference, as it is quite extensive. > If the ICU licence is boost compatible, it would be possible to base an > implementation on ICU however, but that will be determined if the project > is approved by my college. [Bennett, Patrick] If it matters, ICU's license is about as simple as it gets.

1 0

david_abraham's lock in CVS
by Russell Hind 19 Oct '04

19 Oct '04

Trying to check out CVS: and am getting cvs checkout: [08:31:45] waiting for david_abrahams's lock in /cvsroot/boost/boost/tools/build/v2/test/dependency-test/src1 For more than half an hour. How long to these take to expire? Thanks Russell

2 1

patch to build boost on dragonflybsd
by Patrick Mauritz 19 Oct '04

19 Oct '04

the attached patch makes it possible to build boost on dragonflybsd with gcc3.4. the change in boost/python/detail/config.hpp is necessary as dfly doesn't provide the gcc-patched headers that "fix" offsetof(). if defined(freebsd)&&!defined(dragonfly) is in there as dfly sometimes defines both of them. after this patch, everything except boost::serialize (which complains about lack of wchar_t) should build. patrick mauritz

2 1

RE: RE: [boost] Library Proposal: database (boost::db)
by Brian Braatz 19 Oct '04

19 Oct '04

(sorry been away from mail over the last 3 days)- I wanted to respond that JOAQUIN LOPEZ MU?Z Writes: "> If you'd care to sketch what kind of dynamic multi_index > you have in mind (from the user point of view) maybe we > can come out with some solid design to implement > in future releases of the lib. My intention is to stay > away from relational stuff, but I'll go for a dynamic > container if it can be made general purpose." I *very* much want to take you up on this- tonight (about 12 hours from now) I will write something up and show you what I did. > -----Original Message----- > From: boost-bounces(a)lists.boost.org [mailto:boost-bounces@lists.boost.org] > On Behalf Of JOAQUIN LOPEZ MU?Z > Sent: Friday, October 15, 2004 12:06 PM > To: boost(a)lists.boost.org > Subject: Re: RE: [boost] Library Proposal: database (boost::db) > > Hi Brian, > > ----- Mensaje original ----- > De: Brian Braatz <brianb(a)rmtg.com> > Fecha: Viernes, Octubre 15, 2004 6:56 pm > Asunto: RE: [boost] Library Proposal: database (boost::db) > > [...] > > > > I am currently going down this exact path and wanted to share what > > I ran > > into: > > > > 1- Boost does not have a 2dim "Table<>" - i.e. a Recordset > > 2- Boost.multi_index only works with concrete structures > > I would love it if I could use that to make a dynamic Table\ > > recordset > > What do you mean by concrete structures? > > > 3- I have had to build my own Table<> by internally using > > boost.multiindex > > Do you mean, you have actually built a Table<> class > using Boost.MultiIndex? > > > [...] > > > I believe boost is missing a "recordset" analolgy and I would hope > > thatwhatever is created is not "struct only" like > > boost.multi_index. (don't > > get me wrong I LOVE the multi_index - it just doesn't work > > dynamically) > > Well, in the past I thought about what a > dynamic_multi_index_container (with run-time specification > of indices) could look like: the implementation internals > are not hard to solve with the same framework as > Boost.MultiIndex, it is the interface that I don't have a > clear idea about. Also, I don't envision a clear usage > scenario for this, and there are RTTI-like issues > involved as well (what should get<N>() return?) > > If you'd care to sketch what kind of dynamic multi_index > you have in mind (from the user point of view) maybe we > can come out with some solid design to implement > in future releases of the lib. My intention is to stay > away from relational stuff, but I'll go for a dynamic > container if it can be made general purpose. > > On another topic, have you considered Arkadiy's > RTL as another source of ideas/synergies? Seems like > Arkady sort of diverted to his BOOST_TYPEOF facility, > so I don't know what the current status of the lib is. > > Joaquín M López Muñoz > Telefónica, Investigación y Desarrollo >

1 0

RE: [boost] Re: Library Proposal: database (boost::db)
by Brian Braatz 19 Oct '04

19 Oct '04

That's cool. Thank you. Tito/Anyone It would appear that I am working on something similar (though closer to the MYSQL++ model). I am working on a wrapper over ODBC in this vein. I invite again anyone to send me private mail if this discussion gets off topic boost wise. Motivations: 1- We *need* a db layer in boost 2- I *need* to make some modifications in some existing code for a project I am working on- this may or may not be appropriate for boost- i.e. if I can do this and also somehow help a boost db along- then great > On Behalf Of Maciej Sobczak > Sent: Friday, October 15, 2004 11:51 AM > To: boost(a)lists.boost.org > Subject: Re: [boost] Re: Library Proposal: database (boost::db) > Hi, > > Brian Braatz wrote: > > > At the end of the day- I believe that a balance between "recordset"-ish > > model of MYSQL++ and the power of OTL would be a good combination. > > > > A library is not useful if it is too hard to get up to speed on OR too > > terribly different from what people are used to. > > Just to stirr up a little bit: > > http://www.msobczak.com/prog/soci/ > > This library aims at simple usage patterns, where intuitive and almost > "embedded" syntax at at premium. A very different approach from those > you discuss, but in fact complementary and can be merged with other > approaches. > > (the code is to be modified a little bit, but what is available at the > moment works fine with Visual C++ 7.1 and g++ 3.2) > > -- > Maciej Sobczak : http://www.msobczak.com/ > Programming : http://www.msobczak.com/prog/

1 0

[Formal review request] const_string
by Maxim Yegorushkin 19 Oct '04

19 Oct '04

Recent postings showed interest in an immutable string facility [*]. Its interface and implementation has now reached a stable state (I hope). I am formally requesting that const_string be added to the review queue. The documentation can be found here: http://conststring.sf.net/ (it's not in a final state, but I'm going to extend it while it stays in the queue) [*] http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Mail/Message/boost/2180929 -- Maxim Yegorushkin

6 12