- Boost - lists.boost.org

[gsoc2017] Please review my code for Proficiency test.
by Satyam.Pandey 06 Apr '17

06 Apr '17

I have completed my Proficiency Test. Please review the code and suggest anything that you think should be improved. Here is the link to my git repository : https://github.com/sa91/ProficiencyTest I will be really glad to have your suggestions. It would be great help, if someone can suggest me some good testdata for testing my code. Thanks Satyam Pandey -- View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/gsoc2017-Please-review-my-code-for-Profi… Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

1 0

[VS2017][release] vswhere.exe
by Mateusz Loskot 06 Apr '17

06 Apr '17

Hi, This is regarding issues with locating VS 2017 toolset(s). >From CMake ml, I learned about vswhere utility being developed by Microsoft https://github.com/Microsoft/vswhere vswhere.exe (390 KB) is downloadable from https://github.com/Microsoft/vswhere/releases I'm not sure how exactly, but perhaps it would solve some of the Boost.Build's headache (eg. particular PowerShell version required). For example, it can find all VS versions I've got installed (10.0, 11.0, 12.0, 14.0, 15.0): vswhere.exe -legacy find a particular version: vswhere -legacy -version [11.0,12.0) Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net

15 38

program options - adding new functionality
by Sutera Systems 06 Apr '17

06 Apr '17

Hi all, I have just started using boost.program_options for my windows apps. I have a need to add a new functionality. I would appreciate some guidance as to how to do so. Cheers, Larry

2 1

[mailing list] No Reply-To in messages?
by Andrey Semashev 05 Apr '17

05 Apr '17

Hi, Sometimes I can see messages from the mailing list that have no Reply-To header. For example, this is the headers from a recent email from the ML: Delivered-To: andrey.semashev(a)gmail.com Received: by 10.223.171.174 with SMTP id s43csp1184445wrc; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 04:54:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.233.239.75 with SMTP id d72mr28079608qkg.313.1490097251746; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 04:54:11 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: <andrey.a.davydov(a)gmail.com> Received: from mail-qk0-x233.google.com (mail-qk0-x233.google.com. [2607:f8b0:400d:c09::233]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 5si5329794qty.259.2017.03.21.04.54.11 for <andrey.semashev(a)gmail.com> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 21 Mar 2017 04:54:11 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of andrey.a.davydov(a)gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400d:c09::233 as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:400d:c09::233; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=(a)gmail.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of andrey.a.davydov(a)gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400d:c09::233 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=andrey.a.davydov(a)gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: by mail-qk0-x233.google.com with SMTP id y76so54702989qkb.0 for <andrey.semashev(a)gmail.com>; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 04:54:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Az1Qy0ABDDY/isZXuI8r58lTLTG+E/wp0e0IliVZOAk=; b=oPSYU2baFZEWMUKF/s2hay278FTdFBfitQp4TNz5piq0zMWNqePuZaXbUD5SPP0Cnp He9gQzhynjuN/Lf4fpUtqjOWyntF2BSSrdpYbCSmaWnnSQjTz5s53EkOSVgojqHCfmVr A3CSJNK5QdAwkNAm+JQRIShSRO/YpWtK90Lhoa9lKlWF+JtIMwCgFG3h5vN1vw+W1xAB pNoHymY5rZ7Uh0WUHMlpEF/tmkD/tZzDss++3j/lKZNgX66VefCpi510BjKKkFfU2xdy zBba1I5hOOohBUzhlkYf5fSxZ1BkC6FSOizONZr1Mlx8AXLhl2MvmfW6KtR9nt9rjmSa Sfhw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Az1Qy0ABDDY/isZXuI8r58lTLTG+E/wp0e0IliVZOAk=; b=OAFamTGJr76H6gmaG7LGcCRyHIp+Kj1SEs188yLqxEQGCvhYYdB8wMs6GsOYL0wYSY 9M1gYeXwexivqs+WF5Reg9CCh2mnkCUWTM6nSu9/B05sXFBUL/sVyEr7OuSXJpzVqOxl cZorectxLhbWqIqClTxYjSDNDKPJB9n+3OntHKp5l2gJY3mMPaILXbXRh6XXCMHxpYIy w1um18ndeJ0Ed7/nkhGKlzD2HvyPpkVPhjM+hhWmb+lxnVNhbpBFsoor28Yx5arAnVWb 0JndOFeqB3tfjv9DA5x/kuSStkSuG2Q439Fvd/2UuWKsqaR4JhaBejrE7jEnJgrN69on 8wfQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H24Tvn8HI3rOm/9DXmcPc8Hok/lT3XOC2lfnuuWDiN5TsbtV56nLqNTPypggKQsasFDZvOER50I+HaBMH84 X-Received: by 10.55.15.195 with SMTP id 64mr28730703qkp.131.1490097251370; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 04:54:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.12.157.129 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 04:54:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <14065012-bde4-142d-eedf-b5fbf1f51d91(a)gmail.com> References: <CAN1iZb7pGGaFe9OKyDKxMB0Nryiqa3pxk5hLQY+1ybUCMNrZBQ(a)mail.gmail.com> <D5F339D7-3F03-4363-A2A5-F611FE8C76F0(a)gmail.com> <CAN1iZb54emhE_G9McfCmO2nN6D-qWqQSgSC-w1HdRqCAh08c8Q(a)mail.gmail.com> <14065012-bde4-142d-eedf-b5fbf1f51d91(a)gmail.com> From: Andrey Davydov <andrey.a.davydov(a)gmail.com> Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 14:54:10 +0300 Message-ID: <CAN1iZb6VHEUJvt9h8JN_1EubOcYponiEjdXWQGcGZ+VjU_hKJA(a)mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [boost] [smart_ptr] Is there any interest in unique_ptr with type erased deleter? To: boost(a)lists.boost.org Cc: Andrey Semashev <andrey.semashev(a)gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1146f4805976ff054b3c4d27 As a result, when I press Reply, the reply is addressed to the original email sender instead of the mailing list, which is really easy to miss before sending the message. Is it possible to ensure that every email from the ML contains boost(a)lists.boost.org in its Reply-To header? PS: I'm not a guru in email protocols, so if there is another more appropriate way of doing this then that would be fine with me.

13 35

Re: [boost] Official boost macro to determine endianess?
by Frédéric Bron 05 Apr '17

05 Apr '17

> You should check the macro values instead of testing if they are defined > (i.e. use #if instead of #ifdef). Oh thanks, I have to check if it is positive. Now I get the right BOOST_ENDIAN_LITTLE_BYTE (the only one positive). Frédéric

1 0

Re: [boost] Official boost macro to determine endianess?
by Andrey Semashev 05 Apr '17

05 Apr '17

Re-posting. On 04/05/17 16:51, Andrey Semashev wrote: > On 04/05/17 15:29, Frédéric Bron wrote: >> Sorry, I should not have used #elif, in fact ALL macros are defined! >> BOOST_ENDIAN_BIG_BYTE >> BOOST_ENDIAN_BIG_WORD >> BOOST_ENDIAN_LITTLE_BYTE >> BOOST_ENDIAN_LITTLE_WORD >> What does this mean? > > That's how Boost.Predef works: > > http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_63_0/doc/html/predef/using_the_predefs.html > > You should check the macro values instead of testing if they are defined > (i.e. use #if instead of #ifdef). > > Also, please, don't top-post. >

1 0

Official boost macro to determine endianess?
by Frédéric Bron 05 Apr '17

05 Apr '17

What is the official boost macro to determine endianess? And what is the header to include to get it? I cannot find any help in the documentation of boost.endian but I can find those macros by grepping in boost: BOOST_LITTLE_ENDIAN, BOOST_BIG_ENDIAN, BOOST_ENDIAN_BIG_BYTE, BOOST_ENDIAN_BIG_WORD, BOOST_ENDIAN_LITTLE_BYTE, BOOST_ENDIAN_LITTLE_WORD, BOOST_PDP_ENDIAN Thanks, Frédéric

4 9

Re: [boost] Official boost macro to determine endianess?
by Andrey Semashev 05 Apr '17

05 Apr '17

Sent this privately by accident. Again. On 04/05/17 13:14, Andrey Semashev wrote: > On 04/05/17 12:45, Frédéric Bron wrote: >>> I think the modern way to do this is to use Boost.Predef. >> >> Great, thanks! >> >> By the way, why does the predef library not follow the boost policy >> [1] on file names, i.e. saying that header files should have .hpp >> extension and not .h? > > Because it is also usable from C. >

1 0

fix in boost/gil/channel_algorithm.hpp for clang 3.9.1
by Frédéric Bron 04 Apr '17

04 Apr '17

Hi, When compiling with clang 3.9.1, I get an error: /softs/osx32-clang-3.9.1/release/boost/include/boost/gil/extension/io/../../channel_algorithm.hpp:54:85: error: non-type template argument evaluates to -1, which cannot be narrowed to type 'unsigned long long' [-Wc++11-narrowing] struct unsigned_integral_max_value : public mpl::integral_c<UnsignedIntegralChannel,-1> {}; Patch is attached. Frédéric

1 0

Re: [boost] [gsoc2017]Satyam Pandey Copy GSoC 2017 Proposal writen by Ruoyun Jing
by Ruoyun Jing 03 Apr '17

03 Apr '17

*NO ! I REJECT !* *Plagiarism is plagiarism!* 2017-04-03 19:04 GMT+08:00 Satyam Pandey <satyampandey0009(a)gmail.com>: > Sorry for using such harsh words earlier. I'm little frustrated now, I > really want to work in this project and I did not start earlier so , I have > to complete everything in a hurry. As yours and mine background was very > similar (professionally (i.e we do competitive and all)). I used your > proposal as a reference for preparing mine. I would have really thanked > you if you would have helped me to make my proposal better as anyhow we are > working on different projects, so it does not matter even if our proposal > have some similarity. We could have helped each other rather than making > all this mess. > > Thanks > Satyam Pandey > > > On Apr 3, 2017 3:37 PM, "Ruoyun Jing via Boost" <boost(a)lists.boost.org> > wrote: > > Hi Boost, Vissarion, Adam, Niall, David > > Sorry for disturbing you at this time, I experienced a very bad thing that > Satyam Pandey, a student who sent proposal yesterday copied too many > sections of my proposal. I marked the sections red in the given PDF.* I > think the same pattern of GSoC proposal is common, and it does not matter, > but his proposal has too many same description as me. * > > And I received two emails from google docs. I will transmit these two > emails in the following emailsThe meaning of one email is Satyam Pandey do > a replace:replace “Dev Environment Visual Studio for C# development Eclipse > for JAVA development Code Blocks, Sublime T…” to“`+” > > The meaning of another email is Satyam Pandey reject the comment of > "Proposal" from his own, replace “Dev Environment Visual Studio for C# > development Eclipse for JAVA development Code Blocks, Sublime T…” to“`+” > > I sent an email to him, but he did not think he did the copy work. But the > actually thing is* he forked the whole proposal and then change some words > to fix his condition.* > > 2017-04-03 7:42 GMT+08:00 Satyam Pandey <satyampandey0009(a)gmail.com>: > > > Hello Ruyong, > > I just wanted to explain my part here. I did not copy as per what I > > understand.I have tried answering your queries.I hope you will read it > > calmly and would try to understand. > > > > > > 1. As far as I could guess we share similar background of competitive > > programming and have no experience in contributing to any large orgs > . So I > > used your proposal as reference for writing my proposal. > > > > > > 1. Our Programming interest are same cause they are, I will end it > > here. This cannot be called a copy-case because thats-what I feel are > the > > things that I like. How can you question that? Every guy that loves > maths > > and programming would have written it in the same way and I'm not > faking my > > interest toward them as you can check by following the links that I > have > > given about different contest that I have participated in. Or do you > want > > to say no-one other than you can like both. > > 2. The Timeline was, one feature that I liked in your proposal, so I > > used it. How its copying ? Your exact timeline will not even make > sense for > > me,cause we are applying for different Projects. > > 3. And I did not understood "And you did not code for programming > > competency test, but have the same idea of implement of test" . What > > does this mean ? . Firstly I haven't read your proposal after you > start > > describing "*far enough*" . So ,I did not know what you were doing in > > your test. Even if I knew what you have done or written there, do you > > think, you have claimed that way of solving the problem by putting it > in > > your proposal ? And even after reading your proficiency test idea, the > > only thing that matches with my idea is the Basic-Distance function > which > > is the first result that we get after googling the problem ? So , > have we > > both copied from google ?? > > > > > > I do not think this means reference, he just use my discription directly > and change some similar words.* This means COPY. * > > > > And please before going public with this, you could have at-least talked > > to me personally. I don't think Boost-Developer mailing list is meant for > > such discussions. Mailing list are made for communication that concerns > the > > whole org not any individual. You could have directly mailed to me, > before > > creating this nuisance. > > Genuinely you should be happy that people are following your style and if > > not, at least think a little before calling someone cheat because > borrowing > > ideas are not equivalent to cheating , in anyway. > > > > I apologize to all for spamming their mail-boxes > > > > *I do not accept his apologize. I want to be given impartial judgement for > this disgusting COPY.* > > Thanks all for reading.:) > > Best regards. > > _______________________________________________ > Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman > /listinfo.cgi/boost > > > -- Northwest University of China Software Engineering jingry0321(a)gmail.com <jingry0321(a)163.com>

1 0