- Boost - lists.boost.org

[mailing list] No Reply-To in messages?
by Andrey Semashev 05 Apr '17

05 Apr '17

Hi, Sometimes I can see messages from the mailing list that have no Reply-To header. For example, this is the headers from a recent email from the ML: Delivered-To: andrey.semashev(a)gmail.com Received: by 10.223.171.174 with SMTP id s43csp1184445wrc; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 04:54:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.233.239.75 with SMTP id d72mr28079608qkg.313.1490097251746; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 04:54:11 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: <andrey.a.davydov(a)gmail.com> Received: from mail-qk0-x233.google.com (mail-qk0-x233.google.com. [2607:f8b0:400d:c09::233]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 5si5329794qty.259.2017.03.21.04.54.11 for <andrey.semashev(a)gmail.com> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 21 Mar 2017 04:54:11 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of andrey.a.davydov(a)gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400d:c09::233 as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:400d:c09::233; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=(a)gmail.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of andrey.a.davydov(a)gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400d:c09::233 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=andrey.a.davydov(a)gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: by mail-qk0-x233.google.com with SMTP id y76so54702989qkb.0 for <andrey.semashev(a)gmail.com>; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 04:54:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Az1Qy0ABDDY/isZXuI8r58lTLTG+E/wp0e0IliVZOAk=; b=oPSYU2baFZEWMUKF/s2hay278FTdFBfitQp4TNz5piq0zMWNqePuZaXbUD5SPP0Cnp He9gQzhynjuN/Lf4fpUtqjOWyntF2BSSrdpYbCSmaWnnSQjTz5s53EkOSVgojqHCfmVr A3CSJNK5QdAwkNAm+JQRIShSRO/YpWtK90Lhoa9lKlWF+JtIMwCgFG3h5vN1vw+W1xAB pNoHymY5rZ7Uh0WUHMlpEF/tmkD/tZzDss++3j/lKZNgX66VefCpi510BjKKkFfU2xdy zBba1I5hOOohBUzhlkYf5fSxZ1BkC6FSOizONZr1Mlx8AXLhl2MvmfW6KtR9nt9rjmSa Sfhw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Az1Qy0ABDDY/isZXuI8r58lTLTG+E/wp0e0IliVZOAk=; b=OAFamTGJr76H6gmaG7LGcCRyHIp+Kj1SEs188yLqxEQGCvhYYdB8wMs6GsOYL0wYSY 9M1gYeXwexivqs+WF5Reg9CCh2mnkCUWTM6nSu9/B05sXFBUL/sVyEr7OuSXJpzVqOxl cZorectxLhbWqIqClTxYjSDNDKPJB9n+3OntHKp5l2gJY3mMPaILXbXRh6XXCMHxpYIy w1um18ndeJ0Ed7/nkhGKlzD2HvyPpkVPhjM+hhWmb+lxnVNhbpBFsoor28Yx5arAnVWb 0JndOFeqB3tfjv9DA5x/kuSStkSuG2Q439Fvd/2UuWKsqaR4JhaBejrE7jEnJgrN69on 8wfQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H24Tvn8HI3rOm/9DXmcPc8Hok/lT3XOC2lfnuuWDiN5TsbtV56nLqNTPypggKQsasFDZvOER50I+HaBMH84 X-Received: by 10.55.15.195 with SMTP id 64mr28730703qkp.131.1490097251370; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 04:54:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.12.157.129 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 04:54:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <14065012-bde4-142d-eedf-b5fbf1f51d91(a)gmail.com> References: <CAN1iZb7pGGaFe9OKyDKxMB0Nryiqa3pxk5hLQY+1ybUCMNrZBQ(a)mail.gmail.com> <D5F339D7-3F03-4363-A2A5-F611FE8C76F0(a)gmail.com> <CAN1iZb54emhE_G9McfCmO2nN6D-qWqQSgSC-w1HdRqCAh08c8Q(a)mail.gmail.com> <14065012-bde4-142d-eedf-b5fbf1f51d91(a)gmail.com> From: Andrey Davydov <andrey.a.davydov(a)gmail.com> Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 14:54:10 +0300 Message-ID: <CAN1iZb6VHEUJvt9h8JN_1EubOcYponiEjdXWQGcGZ+VjU_hKJA(a)mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [boost] [smart_ptr] Is there any interest in unique_ptr with type erased deleter? To: boost(a)lists.boost.org Cc: Andrey Semashev <andrey.semashev(a)gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1146f4805976ff054b3c4d27 As a result, when I press Reply, the reply is addressed to the original email sender instead of the mailing list, which is really easy to miss before sending the message. Is it possible to ensure that every email from the ML contains boost(a)lists.boost.org in its Reply-To header? PS: I'm not a guru in email protocols, so if there is another more appropriate way of doing this then that would be fine with me.

13 35

Re: [boost] Official boost macro to determine endianess?
by Frédéric Bron 05 Apr '17

05 Apr '17

> You should check the macro values instead of testing if they are defined > (i.e. use #if instead of #ifdef). Oh thanks, I have to check if it is positive. Now I get the right BOOST_ENDIAN_LITTLE_BYTE (the only one positive). Frédéric

1 0

Re: [boost] Official boost macro to determine endianess?
by Andrey Semashev 05 Apr '17

05 Apr '17

Re-posting. On 04/05/17 16:51, Andrey Semashev wrote: > On 04/05/17 15:29, Frédéric Bron wrote: >> Sorry, I should not have used #elif, in fact ALL macros are defined! >> BOOST_ENDIAN_BIG_BYTE >> BOOST_ENDIAN_BIG_WORD >> BOOST_ENDIAN_LITTLE_BYTE >> BOOST_ENDIAN_LITTLE_WORD >> What does this mean? > > That's how Boost.Predef works: > > http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_63_0/doc/html/predef/using_the_predefs.html > > You should check the macro values instead of testing if they are defined > (i.e. use #if instead of #ifdef). > > Also, please, don't top-post. >

1 0

Official boost macro to determine endianess?
by Frédéric Bron 05 Apr '17

05 Apr '17

What is the official boost macro to determine endianess? And what is the header to include to get it? I cannot find any help in the documentation of boost.endian but I can find those macros by grepping in boost: BOOST_LITTLE_ENDIAN, BOOST_BIG_ENDIAN, BOOST_ENDIAN_BIG_BYTE, BOOST_ENDIAN_BIG_WORD, BOOST_ENDIAN_LITTLE_BYTE, BOOST_ENDIAN_LITTLE_WORD, BOOST_PDP_ENDIAN Thanks, Frédéric

4 9

Re: [boost] Official boost macro to determine endianess?
by Andrey Semashev 05 Apr '17

05 Apr '17

Sent this privately by accident. Again. On 04/05/17 13:14, Andrey Semashev wrote: > On 04/05/17 12:45, Frédéric Bron wrote: >>> I think the modern way to do this is to use Boost.Predef. >> >> Great, thanks! >> >> By the way, why does the predef library not follow the boost policy >> [1] on file names, i.e. saying that header files should have .hpp >> extension and not .h? > > Because it is also usable from C. >

1 0

fix in boost/gil/channel_algorithm.hpp for clang 3.9.1
by Frédéric Bron 04 Apr '17

04 Apr '17

Hi, When compiling with clang 3.9.1, I get an error: /softs/osx32-clang-3.9.1/release/boost/include/boost/gil/extension/io/../../channel_algorithm.hpp:54:85: error: non-type template argument evaluates to -1, which cannot be narrowed to type 'unsigned long long' [-Wc++11-narrowing] struct unsigned_integral_max_value : public mpl::integral_c<UnsignedIntegralChannel,-1> {}; Patch is attached. Frédéric

1 0

Re: [boost] [gsoc2017]Satyam Pandey Copy GSoC 2017 Proposal writen by Ruoyun Jing
by Ruoyun Jing 03 Apr '17

03 Apr '17

*NO ! I REJECT !* *Plagiarism is plagiarism!* 2017-04-03 19:04 GMT+08:00 Satyam Pandey <satyampandey0009(a)gmail.com>: > Sorry for using such harsh words earlier. I'm little frustrated now, I > really want to work in this project and I did not start earlier so , I have > to complete everything in a hurry. As yours and mine background was very > similar (professionally (i.e we do competitive and all)). I used your > proposal as a reference for preparing mine. I would have really thanked > you if you would have helped me to make my proposal better as anyhow we are > working on different projects, so it does not matter even if our proposal > have some similarity. We could have helped each other rather than making > all this mess. > > Thanks > Satyam Pandey > > > On Apr 3, 2017 3:37 PM, "Ruoyun Jing via Boost" <boost(a)lists.boost.org> > wrote: > > Hi Boost, Vissarion, Adam, Niall, David > > Sorry for disturbing you at this time, I experienced a very bad thing that > Satyam Pandey, a student who sent proposal yesterday copied too many > sections of my proposal. I marked the sections red in the given PDF.* I > think the same pattern of GSoC proposal is common, and it does not matter, > but his proposal has too many same description as me. * > > And I received two emails from google docs. I will transmit these two > emails in the following emailsThe meaning of one email is Satyam Pandey do > a replace:replace “Dev Environment Visual Studio for C# development Eclipse > for JAVA development Code Blocks, Sublime T…” to“`+” > > The meaning of another email is Satyam Pandey reject the comment of > "Proposal" from his own, replace “Dev Environment Visual Studio for C# > development Eclipse for JAVA development Code Blocks, Sublime T…” to“`+” > > I sent an email to him, but he did not think he did the copy work. But the > actually thing is* he forked the whole proposal and then change some words > to fix his condition.* > > 2017-04-03 7:42 GMT+08:00 Satyam Pandey <satyampandey0009(a)gmail.com>: > > > Hello Ruyong, > > I just wanted to explain my part here. I did not copy as per what I > > understand.I have tried answering your queries.I hope you will read it > > calmly and would try to understand. > > > > > > 1. As far as I could guess we share similar background of competitive > > programming and have no experience in contributing to any large orgs > . So I > > used your proposal as reference for writing my proposal. > > > > > > 1. Our Programming interest are same cause they are, I will end it > > here. This cannot be called a copy-case because thats-what I feel are > the > > things that I like. How can you question that? Every guy that loves > maths > > and programming would have written it in the same way and I'm not > faking my > > interest toward them as you can check by following the links that I > have > > given about different contest that I have participated in. Or do you > want > > to say no-one other than you can like both. > > 2. The Timeline was, one feature that I liked in your proposal, so I > > used it. How its copying ? Your exact timeline will not even make > sense for > > me,cause we are applying for different Projects. > > 3. And I did not understood "And you did not code for programming > > competency test, but have the same idea of implement of test" . What > > does this mean ? . Firstly I haven't read your proposal after you > start > > describing "*far enough*" . So ,I did not know what you were doing in > > your test. Even if I knew what you have done or written there, do you > > think, you have claimed that way of solving the problem by putting it > in > > your proposal ? And even after reading your proficiency test idea, the > > only thing that matches with my idea is the Basic-Distance function > which > > is the first result that we get after googling the problem ? So , > have we > > both copied from google ?? > > > > > > I do not think this means reference, he just use my discription directly > and change some similar words.* This means COPY. * > > > > And please before going public with this, you could have at-least talked > > to me personally. I don't think Boost-Developer mailing list is meant for > > such discussions. Mailing list are made for communication that concerns > the > > whole org not any individual. You could have directly mailed to me, > before > > creating this nuisance. > > Genuinely you should be happy that people are following your style and if > > not, at least think a little before calling someone cheat because > borrowing > > ideas are not equivalent to cheating , in anyway. > > > > I apologize to all for spamming their mail-boxes > > > > *I do not accept his apologize. I want to be given impartial judgement for > this disgusting COPY.* > > Thanks all for reading.:) > > Best regards. > > _______________________________________________ > Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman > /listinfo.cgi/boost > > > -- Northwest University of China Software Engineering jingry0321(a)gmail.com <jingry0321(a)163.com>

1 0

Re: [boost] [gsoc2017]Satyam Pandey Copy GSoC 2017 Proposal writen by Ruoyun Jing
by Ruoyun Jing 03 Apr '17

03 Apr '17

*plagiarism is plagiarism, regardless project, and stop acting like a 3 years old!* 2017-04-03 18:57 GMT+08:00 Satyam Pandey <satyampandey0009(a)gmail.com>: > Hello Ruoyun, > Sorry,I m not good with Chinese names So, I used he. I'm not acting as 3 > year old but I think you are, using your idea in writing proposal by taking > a reference is very popular and is always encouraged. If you believe the > ideas that you get are so unique that no one else can think it by > themselves. You could have send your proposal personally to them. > And you know you have given even the edit accesses on your doc, please > remove it else someone can mess up with your doc. I wrote my proposal by > myself according to me, so it will be better if you can leave it upto > mentors to decide whether I copied or not. > *reference implies quotation or citation of your original work, which in this topic, was neither. as the resemblance between two proposals is simple too obvious to consider anything other than full copy of the origin * > On Apr 3, 2017 4:16 PM, "Ruoyun Jing" <jingry0321(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> plagiarism is plagiarism, regardless project, and stop acting like a 3 >> years old >> >> 2017-04-03 18:41 GMT+08:00 Ruoyun Jing <jingry0321(a)gmail.com>: >> >>> “She” please. >>> >>> 2017-04-03 18:33 GMT+08:00 Satyam Pandey <satyampandey0009(a)gmail.com>: >>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> I don't know why Ryoung is so fixated on the matter ? The comment that >>>> I made in his doc was an accident, so I removed it .That's why he got such >>>> mail later. >>>> * Secondly, We are applying for "different projects " . Copying his >>>> exact proposal will not even make sense for me.* >>>> What I used was his style of writing with some other older proposal . I >>>> am adding them as reference here too. >>>> I really feel this is too frustrating why this guy don't even >>>> understand that we are doing 2 different projects, so I can't copy him . >>>> And Sorry to tell you, I used used Moss on our proposal and there is less >>>> than 10% match is our proposal, if you claim that I have just changed a few >>>> words come with some proof as moss is telling something different. >>>> >>>> Please someone look into it. It is very irritating. >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> Satyam Pandey >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Apr 3, 2017 3:37 PM, "Ruoyun Jing via Boost" <boost(a)lists.boost.org> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Boost, Vissarion, Adam, Niall, David >>>> >>>> Sorry for disturbing you at this time, I experienced a very bad thing >>>> that >>>> Satyam Pandey, a student who sent proposal yesterday copied too many >>>> sections of my proposal. I marked the sections red in the given PDF.* I >>>> think the same pattern of GSoC proposal is common, and it does not >>>> matter, >>>> but his proposal has too many same description as me. * >>>> >>>> And I received two emails from google docs. I will transmit these two >>>> emails in the following emailsThe meaning of one email is Satyam Pandey >>>> do >>>> a replace:replace “Dev Environment Visual Studio for C# development >>>> Eclipse >>>> for JAVA development Code Blocks, Sublime T…” to“`+” >>>> >>>> The meaning of another email is Satyam Pandey reject the comment of >>>> "Proposal" from his own, replace “Dev Environment Visual Studio for C# >>>> development Eclipse for JAVA development Code Blocks, Sublime T…” >>>> to“`+” >>>> >>>> I sent an email to him, but he did not think he did the copy work. But >>>> the >>>> actually thing is* he forked the whole proposal and then change some >>>> words >>>> to fix his condition.* >>>> >>>> 2017-04-03 7:42 GMT+08:00 Satyam Pandey <satyampandey0009(a)gmail.com>: >>>> >>>> > Hello Ruyong, >>>> > I just wanted to explain my part here. I did not copy as per what I >>>> > understand.I have tried answering your queries.I hope you will read it >>>> > calmly and would try to understand. >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > 1. As far as I could guess we share similar background of >>>> competitive >>>> > programming and have no experience in contributing to any large >>>> orgs . So I >>>> > used your proposal as reference for writing my proposal. >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > 1. Our Programming interest are same cause they are, I will end it >>>> > here. This cannot be called a copy-case because thats-what I feel >>>> are the >>>> > things that I like. How can you question that? Every guy that >>>> loves maths >>>> > and programming would have written it in the same way and I'm not >>>> faking my >>>> > interest toward them as you can check by following the links that >>>> I have >>>> > given about different contest that I have participated in. Or do >>>> you want >>>> > to say no-one other than you can like both. >>>> > 2. The Timeline was, one feature that I liked in your proposal, so >>>> I >>>> > used it. How its copying ? Your exact timeline will not even make >>>> sense for >>>> > me,cause we are applying for different Projects. >>>> > 3. And I did not understood "And you did not code for programming >>>> > competency test, but have the same idea of implement of test" . >>>> What >>>> > does this mean ? . Firstly I haven't read your proposal after you >>>> start >>>> > describing "*far enough*" . So ,I did not know what you were doing >>>> in >>>> > your test. Even if I knew what you have done or written there, do >>>> you >>>> > think, you have claimed that way of solving the problem by putting >>>> it in >>>> > your proposal ? And even after reading your proficiency test idea, >>>> the >>>> > only thing that matches with my idea is the Basic-Distance >>>> function which >>>> > is the first result that we get after googling the problem ? So , >>>> have we >>>> > both copied from google ?? >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > I do not think this means reference, he just use my discription >>>> directly >>>> and change some similar words.* This means COPY. * >>>> >>>> >>>> > And please before going public with this, you could have at-least >>>> talked >>>> > to me personally. I don't think Boost-Developer mailing list is meant >>>> for >>>> > such discussions. Mailing list are made for communication that >>>> concerns the >>>> > whole org not any individual. You could have directly mailed to me, >>>> before >>>> > creating this nuisance. >>>> > Genuinely you should be happy that people are following your style >>>> and if >>>> > not, at least think a little before calling someone cheat because >>>> borrowing >>>> > ideas are not equivalent to cheating , in anyway. >>>> > >>>> > I apologize to all for spamming their mail-boxes >>>> > >>>> >>>> *I do not accept his apologize. I want to be given impartial judgement >>>> for >>>> this disgusting COPY.* >>>> >>>> Thanks all for reading.:) >>>> >>>> Best regards. >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman >>>> /listinfo.cgi/boost >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Northwest University of China >>> Software Engineering >>> jingry0321(a)gmail.com <jingry0321(a)163.com> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Northwest University of China >> Software Engineering >> jingry0321(a)gmail.com <jingry0321(a)163.com> >> > -- Northwest University of China Software Engineering jingry0321(a)gmail.com <jingry0321(a)163.com>

1 0

Re: [boost] [gsoc2017]Satyam Pandey Copy GSoC 2017 Proposal writen by Ruoyun Jing
by Ruoyun Jing 03 Apr '17

03 Apr '17

Hi Boost, Here are two emails google docs sent to me.Sorry for my language The meaning of one email is Satyam Pandey do a replace:replace “Dev Environment Visual Studio for C# development Eclipse for JAVA development Code Blocks, Sublime T…” to“`+” ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Satyam Pandey (Google 文档) <d+MTA0OTYzMTEyNjU1MDQ4ODM2NjY 4-MTE2NjIwMzk2NDMwMjUwNDI3MDcx(a)docs.google.com> Date: 2017-04-02 21:03 GMT+08:00 Subject: Proposal - 替换：将“Dev Environment Visual Studio fo... To: jingry0321(a)gmail.com Satyam Pandey拒绝了“Proposal <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wj9xPSmdehh9MzE-3MGHMu7cwMhDPASUEvU9pJb…> ”中的建议 [image: Satyam Pandey] Satyam Pandey 替换：将“Dev Environment Visual Studio for C# development Eclipse for JAVA development Code Blocks, Sublime T…”替换为“`+” [image: Satyam Pandey] Satyam Pandey *已拒绝建议* 打开 <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wj9xPSmdehh9MzE-3MGHMu7cwMhDPASUEvU9pJb…> Google Inc. 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, USA 您收到此邮件是因为您订阅了有关“Proposal <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wj9xPSmdehh9MzE-3MGHMu7cwMhDPASUEvU9pJb…> ”的所有讨论。更改 Google 文档向您发送的内容。 <https://docs.google.com/document/docos/notify?id=1wj9xPSmdehh9MzE-3MGHMu7cw…> 您可以通过回复此邮件来参与讨论。 The meaning of another email is Satyam Pandey reject the comment of "Proposal" from his own, replace “Dev Environment Visual Studio for C# development Eclipse for JAVA development Code Blocks, Sublime T…” to“`+” ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Satyam Pandey (Google 文档) < d+MTA0OTYzMTEyNjU1MDQ4ODM2NjY4-MTE2NjIwMzk2NDMwMjUwNDI3MDcx(a)docs.google.com> Date: 2017-04-02 21:03 GMT+08:00 Subject: Proposal - 替换：将“Dev Environment Visual Studio fo... To: jingry0321(a)gmail.com Satyam Pandey拒绝了“Proposal <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wj9xPSmdehh9MzE-3MGHMu7cwMhDPASUEvU9pJb…> ”中的建议 [image: Satyam Pandey] *Satyam Pandey* 替换：将“Dev Environment Visual Studio for C# development Eclipse for JAVA development Code Blocks, Sublime T…”替换为“`+” [image: Satyam Pandey] *Satyam Pandey* *已拒绝建议* 打开 <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wj9xPSmdehh9MzE-3MGHMu7cwMhDPASUEvU9pJb…> Google Inc. 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, USA 您收到此邮件是因为您订阅了有关“Proposal <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wj9xPSmdehh9MzE-3MGHMu7cwMhDPASUEvU9pJb…> ”的所有讨论。更改 Google 文档向您发送的内容。 <https://docs.google.com/document/docos/notify?id=1wj9xPSmdehh9MzE-3MGHMu7cw…> 您可以通过回复此邮件来参与讨论。 -- Northwest University of China Software Engineering jingry0321(a)gmail.com <jingry0321(a)163.com>

1 0

Fwd: Proposal - 替换：将“Dev Environment Visual Studio fo...
by Ruoyun Jing 03 Apr '17

03 Apr '17

Hi Boost, Here is the first email google docs sent to me. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Satyam Pandey (Google 文档) < d+MTA0OTYzMTEyNjU1MDQ4ODM2NjY4-MTE2NjIwMzk2NDMwMjUwNDI3MDcx(a)docs.google.com> Date: 2017-04-02 20:06 GMT+08:00 Subject: Proposal - 替换：将“Dev Environment Visual Studio fo... To: jingry0321(a)gmail.com Satyam Pandey向“Proposal <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wj9xPSmdehh9MzE-3MGHMu7cwMhDPASUEvU9pJb…> ”添加了一条建议 [image: Satyam Pandey] *Satyam Pandey* 替换：将“Dev Environment Visual Studio for C# development Eclipse for JAVA development Code Blocks, Sublime T…”替换为“`+” 打开 <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wj9xPSmdehh9MzE-3MGHMu7cwMhDPASUEvU9pJb…> Google Inc. 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, USA 您收到此邮件是因为您订阅了有关“Proposal <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wj9xPSmdehh9MzE-3MGHMu7cwMhDPASUEvU9pJb…> ”的所有讨论。更改 Google 文档向您发送的内容。 <https://docs.google.com/document/docos/notify?id=1wj9xPSmdehh9MzE-3MGHMu7cw…> 您可以通过回复此邮件来参与讨论。 -- Northwest University of China Software Engineering jingry0321(a)gmail.com <jingry0321(a)163.com>

1 0