- Boost - lists.boost.org

BOOST_FUSION_ADAPT_STRUCT - Printing Array Elements
by forums_mp 16 Nov '12

16 Nov '12

Given the snippet below. How do I print the contents within the array ? I'd expect to see a counting pattern when the array is encountered but that's not the case. Thanks in advance. [code] #include <boost/mpl/eval_if.hpp> #include <boost/mpl/identity.hpp> #include <boost/mpl/next_prior.hpp> #include <boost/fusion/mpl.hpp> #include <boost/fusion/adapted.hpp> // BOOST_FUSION_ADAPT_STRUCT // boost::fusion::result_of::value_at #include <boost/fusion/sequence/intrinsic/value_at.hpp> #include <boost/fusion/include/value_at.hpp> // boost::fusion::result_of::size #include <boost/fusion/sequence/intrinsic/size.hpp> #include <boost/fusion/include/size.hpp> // boost::fusion::at #include <boost/fusion/sequence/intrinsic/at.hpp> #include <boost/fusion/include/at.hpp> # include <iostream> # include <vector> typedef std::vector < int > INT_VEC ; // Your existing struct struct my_struct { int i; bool j; int arr1 [ 100 ]; // INT_VEC vv ; // my_struct() // : vv ( 100 ) // {} }; // Generate an adapter allowing to view "Foo" as a Boost.Fusion sequence BOOST_FUSION_ADAPT_STRUCT( my_struct, (int, i) (bool, j) (int, arr1[ 100 ] ) // (int, vv[100]) ) template <typename T2> struct parse_foo { static void parse(T2 & f); }; struct display { template <typename T> void operator()(T& t) const { std::printf(" --%s--%s-- \n", typeid(t).name(), boost::lexical_cast<std::string>(t).c_str()); if (typeid(t).name()[0] == 'c') std::printf(" --%s--%s-- \n", typeid(t).name(), t); parse_foo<T>::parse(t); } }; template <> void parse_foo<int >::parse(int & f) { std::cout << f << std::endl; } template <> void parse_foo<char>::parse(char & f) {}; template <> void parse_foo<bool>::parse(bool & f) { std::cout << f << std::endl; }; #include <boost/fusion/include/sequence.hpp> #include <boost/fusion/include/algorithm.hpp> #include <boost/fusion/include/vector.hpp> #include <boost/fusion/include/adapt_struct.hpp> #include <boost/lexical_cast.hpp> int main() { my_struct f; f.i = 33 ; f.j = false ;; for ( int odx ( 0 ); odx < 100; ++odx ) { f.arr1 [ odx ] = odx ; } boost::fusion::for_each(f, display()); } [/code] -- View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/BOOST-FUSION-ADAPT-STRUCT-Printing-Array… Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

1 0

Re: [boost] [Boost-commit] svn:boost r81360 - in trunk: boost/algorithm libs/algorithm/test
by Steven Watanabe 15 Nov '12

15 Nov '12

AMDG On 11/15/2012 11:45 AM, marshall(a)idio.com wrote: > <snip> > + // construct/copy > + BOOST_CONSTEXPR basic_string_ref () > +#ifdef BOOST_NO_CXX11_NULLPTR > + : ptr_(NULL), len_(0) {} > +#else > + : ptr_(nullptr), len_(0) {} > +#endif Really? The two branches have exactly the same effect. The only reason to prefer nullptr is aesthetic and this is more than offset by the #ifdef. > + > + basic_string_ref(const charT* str) > + : ptr_(str), len_(std::strlen(str)) {} > + strlen only works for char. You need to use traits::length > +#ifndef BOOST_NO_CXX11_HDR_INITIALIZER_LIST > +// !! How do I do this? Look how initializer_lists work! > + basic_string_ref(std::initializer_list<charT> il); // TODO > +#endif > + Although this can be implemented, it's incredibly dangerous, because the string_ref will be left dangling when the initializer_list goes out of scope. > + > + // iterators > + BOOST_CONSTEXPR const_iterator begin() const { return ptr_; } > + BOOST_CONSTEXPR const_iterator cbegin() const { return ptr_; } > + BOOST_CONSTEXPR const_iterator end() const { return ptr_ + len_; } > + BOOST_CONSTEXPR const_iterator cend() const { return ptr_ + len_; } > + const_reverse_iterator rbegin() const { return const_reverse_iterator (end()); } > + const_reverse_iterator crbegin() const { return const_reverse_iterator (end()); } > + const_reverse_iterator rend() const { return const_reverse_iterator (begin()); } > + const_reverse_iterator crend() const { return const_reverse_iterator (begin()); } > + Check for tabs? > + // capacity > + BOOST_CONSTEXPR size_type max_size() const { return len_; } I'm not convinced that this definition is correct. Returns: the size of the largest possible string. Note that this does not say that it returns the maximum size that this particular string_ref object can hold without reassignment. > + > + int compare(basic_string_ref x) const { > + int cmp = std::memcmp ( ptr_, x.ptr_, std::min(len_, x.len_)); > + return cmp != 0 ? cmp : ( len_ == x.len_ ? 0 : len_ < x.len_ ? -1 : 1 ); > + } > + > + bool starts_with(charT c) const { return !empty() && front() == c; } > + bool starts_with(basic_string_ref x) const { > + return len_ >= x.len_ && std::memcmp ( ptr_, x.ptr_, x.len_ ) == 0; > + } > + > + bool ends_with(charT c) const { return !empty() && back() == c; } > + bool ends_with(basic_string_ref x) const { > + return len_ >= x.len_ && std::memcmp ( ptr_ + len_ - x.len_, x.ptr_, x.len_ ) == 0; > + } > + You can only use memcmp for char. You have to use traits::compare here. > + > +// Have to use traits here > + size_type find(basic_string_ref s) const { > + const_iterator iter = std::find_if ( this->cbegin (), this->cend (), > + s.cbegin (), s.cend (), traits::eq ); > + return iter = this->cend () ? npos : std::distance ( this->cbegin (), iter ); > + } > + I think you mean std::search, not std::find_if. > + size_type find(charT c) const { > +#ifdef BOOST_NO_CXX11_LAMBDAS > + const_iterator iter = std::find_if ( this->cbegin (), this->cend (), > + detail::string_ref_traits_eq<charT, traits> ( c )); > +#else > + const_iterator iter = std::find_if ( this->cbegin (), this->cend (), > + [c] ( charT val ) { return traits::eq ( c, val ); } ); > +#endif > + return iter == this->cend () ? npos : std::distance ( this->cbegin (), iter ); > + } > + As with NULL/nulptr, I don't see the point of using C++11 lambdas if you have to #ifdef it with a C++03 implementation. In Christ, Steven Watanabe

2 1

[multiprecision] OK to merge to Trunk?
by John Maddock 15 Nov '12

15 Nov '12

Folks, Unless there are any objections, I'd like to merge the multiprecision library to SVN Trunk pretty soon. Here are the main changes since the review, which have mostly concentrated on the interface changes: * Non-expression template operators further optimized with rvalue reference support. * Many functions made `constexp`. * Differentiate between explicit and implicit conversions in the number constructor. * Removed "mp_" prefix from types. * Allowed mixed precision arithmetic. * Changed ExpressionTemplates parameter to class `number` to use enumerated values rather than true/false. * Changed ExpressionTemplate parameter default value to use a traits class so that the default value depends on the backend used. * Added support for fused-multiply-add/subtract with GMP support. * Tweaked expression template unpacking to use fewer temporaries when the LHS also appears in the RHS. * Refactored `cpp_int_backend` based on review comments with new template parameter structure. * Added additional template parameter to `mpfr_float_backend` to allow stack-based allocation. * Added section on mixed precision arithmetic, and added support for operations yielding a higher precision result than either of the arguments. * Added overloads of integer-specific functions for built in integer types. Things requested in review, but not yet done: * We can reuse temporaries in multiple subtrees (temporary caching). Low priority for now. * cpp_dec_float should round to nearest. Chris currently has no time for this, and it's really hard to do *right*. * A 2's complement fixed precision int that uses exactly N bits and no more. Refactoring of cpp_int should make this easier to add as an option in future. There are also documentation updates pending (mostly relating to the new improved performance results), and more tests I want to add/run, bit basically I need to get things widely tested to move forward now. Release schedule wise, I think it'll be hard to get things ready for the next release, but the release after that really should be on the cards. So basically now is the last chance for folks to complain before the interface gets ossified ;-) As ever current code is in the sandbox under /big_number/ and docs can be viewed online here: http://svn.boost.org/svn/boost/sandbox/big_number/libs/multiprecision/doc/h… Regards, John.

7 10

boost filesystem path as utf-8 revisited
by Rush Manbert 15 Nov '12

15 Nov '12

In the original thread, I found this reply by Beman: ----------------- > > > How exactly do I imbue UTF-8 codecvt in a path? I Googled around and > couldn't find anything. There are two approaches: * If you always want all class path arguments and returned values with a value type of char to be treated as being UTF-8 encoded, and aren't worried about changing a potentially dangerous global, then do this: #include <boost/filesystem/detail/utf8_codecvt_facet.hpp> ... std::locale global_loc = std::locale(); std::locale loc(global_loc, new boost::filesystem::detail::utf8_codecvt_facet); boost::filesystem::path::imbue(loc); ----------------- I do want what is described and would like to use this approach, but we use boost::filesystem all over the place and in our code we never do any sort of "global initialization", so I'm trying to figure out how to get the code snippet executed. I can see two ways to approach this: 1) Add this code snippet to the boost::filesystem::path constructor. But is it too late then? 2) Define a class whose only purpose is to execute this code when it is constructed and arrange to have a static singleton instance of the class defined. In one of our libraries we need to be very careful about static class construction order, so this may be difficult. I haven't dealt with this sort of issue in quite a while and I may be a little rusty. Any suggestions? Are there new goodies in C++ that might help me? Thanks, Rush

3 3

program_options::store() interface extension
by ST 15 Nov '12

15 Nov '12

Hi, I need to supply to my app a config file with following entries: item1 = 123 item2 = 435 item3 = 345 ... itemN = 562 where N is not known in advance, so there is no way to register such options. The only way to deal with them is to pass them as unregistered options and then use collect_unrecognized(). But then dealing with a vector<string> is not quit convenient. My suggestion is to add an a storeUnregistered flag to the store() function which will be false by default, but if set to true, will store all unregistered options with their values as strings. It will be possible then to check whether an item was provided like this: vm.count("item1") and cast its value like this: vm["item1"].as<int>() . Or is there already a good way to do what I need? Thank you in advance, ST

2 1

Re: [boost] [container] container_detail::pair piecewise constructor
by László Szécsi 15 Nov '12

15 Nov '12

I did some more research and it turns out std-style piecewise construction fails with VS2012 Nov CTP compiler, just like my attempt at adding piecewise construction to boost::container_detail::pair. In particular, the following dummy code compiles under g++ 4.7.1 but not under VS2012 Nov CTP. class Foo { public: template <class... Args1, class... Args2> Foo( const ::std::piecewise_construct_t, ::std::tuple<Args1...> first_args, ::std::tuple<Args2...> second_args) { } }; int main(){ Foo s( std::piecewise_construct, std::move( std::make_tuple(30) ), std::move( std::make_tuple(50) )); } I guess the time is not ripe for the container implementation to use true variadic templates yet. Is there ongoing effort to implement container_detail::pair's piecewise constructor in the same way as it was implemented in boost::unordered? Best regards, Laszlo Szecsi

1 0

[optional] Support for moving values
by Adam Badura 14 Nov '12

14 Nov '12

Are there any plans to add support for move constructors and assignment operators? I noticed that many Boost libraries miss that support. And it is especially "visible" in case of such utilities like boost::optional or boost::variant. Adam Badura

2 1

Boost 1.52.0 released!
by Marshall Clow 14 Nov '12

14 Nov '12

Release 1.52.0 of the Boost C++ Libraries is now available. These open-source libraries work well with the C++ Standard Library, and are usable across a broad spectrum of applications. The Boost license encourages both commercial and non-commercial use. This release contains numerous enhancements and bug fixes for existing libraries. For details, including download links, see http://www.boost.org/users/news/version_1_52_0 You can also download directly from SourceForge: http://sourceforge.net/projects/boost/files/boost/1.52.0/ To install this release on your system, see http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/release/more/getting_started/index.html Thanks, --The Boost release team Beman Dawes Daniel James Eric Niebler Marshall Clow Rene Rivera Vladimir Prus

9 11

[optional] Types without assignment operator
by Adam Badura 14 Nov '12

14 Nov '12

I use boost::optional for deferred construction. Something similar to the idea described in "Bypassing expensive unnecessary default construction" in Boost.Optional documentation. Only in my case I do this because the mentioned construction requires virtual function calls and this cannot be done in owning object constructor and has to be postponed. So instead of accessing the object directly I always access it by a function. That function first checks if the object is already constructed (boost::optional is initialized) and if so just returns it. Otherwise it first constructs it. That approach requires only copy construction (or even move construction if boost::optional would support moving in the first place). Yet due to implementation details the embedded type has to be assignable as well. Even thou assignment operator will never be called (in this scenario). Is there a way to avoid this issue? If not then how about adding a function like "assign" (possibly named otherwise or with additional defaulting argument) which could assign by first destroying old object (if any) and then copy/move constructing a new one. This would obviously be bad from exception safety (guarantees) point of view, but well... don't call the function if you don't like that. And in scenarios like mine it would not be an issue since there would be no object to destroy anyway. (Also the function could assert/throw on that condition...) Now the Synopsis part of the Boost.Optional documentation does mention (Typed)InPlaceFactory assign operators which do look promising for solving this issue. But firstly they are not documented in following Detailed Semantics part. There is even no link in the Synopsis. (Is this docs bug? In which part? Missing docs or extra functions?) And secondly (Typed)InPlaceFactory support is "intrusive". I cannot add it to a class without changing the class itself. And in my case I cannot change the class (boost::program_options::options_description - why cannot it be copy assigned, that I don't know...). Maybe adding some extra wrapper would help but I don't think it would be a solution. Rather a somewhat ugly workaround. Adam Badura

3 8

Possible submission: Expanded std::bind compatible with std::move
by スマートアシュリー 14 Nov '12

14 Nov '12

I noticed that std::bind inst compatible with std::move.. I created a workaround for it in c++11 here. I would like to see it added to boost if thats ok. Please review my code... and let me know if its a viable candidate to be added to boost and what code changes are need before that. http://code-slim-jim.blogspot.jp/2012/11/perfect-forwarding-bind-compatable…

2 1