- Boost - lists.boost.org

[Variant] C++11 variadic template implementation
by Florian Goujeon 11 Sep '12

11 Sep '12

Hi Boosters, I'd like to know if anybody were working on a C++11 version (using variadic templates) of Boost.Variant. I currently use the 'classic' version in my project, but since I need more-than-20-type variants, the compilation take a lot of time (extending the number of types that variant can support forces you to disable the use of precompiled headers). Plus, I'll need to use 70 type variants (MPL lists are physically limited to 50 types). If nobody has started to implement such a version yet, I'd be pleased to contribute. I've written an implementation. It's incomplete and far from perfect, but it could (hopefully) be a viable working basis.

6 16

[HELP] fatal error LNK1120: 5 unresolved externals
by Seow Hui, Saw 10 Sep '12

10 Sep '12

Dear Sir/ Madam, A very good day to you. I installed boost 1.50 installer (32-bit) which downloaded from http://www.boostpro.com/download/ and did the appropriate settings (including CGAL) in Microsoft Visual Studio 2010. I would like to run the following sample code: #include <iostream> #include <CGAL\Exact_predicates_inexact_constructions_kernel.h> #include <CGAL\convex_hull_2.h> typedef CGAL::Exact_predicates_inexact_constructions_kernel K; typedef K::Point_2 Point_2; int main() { Point_2 points[5] = { Point_2(0, 0), Point_2(10, 0), Point_2(10, 10), Point_2(6, 5), Point_2(4, 1) }; Point_2 result[5]; Point_2 *ptr = CGAL::convex_hull_2( points, points+5, result ); std::cout << ptr - result << " points on the convex hull" << std::endl; return 0; } There are no errors during compilation but there are errors during the build as shown below: 1>------ Build started: Project: Cgal_Hello, Configuration: Debug Win32 ------ 1>libboost_system-vc100-mt-gd-1_50.lib(error_code.obj) : error LNK2005: "public: __thiscall std::basic_string<char,struct std::char_traits<char>,class std::allocator<char> >::basic_string<char,struct std::char_traits<char>,class std::allocator<char> >(class std::basic_string<char,struct std::char_traits<char>,class std::allocator<char> > const &)" (??0?$basic_string@DU?$char_traits@D@std@@V?$allocator@D@2@@std@@QAE@ABV01@@Z) already defined in msvcprtd.lib(MSVCP90D.dll) 1>libboost_system-vc100-mt-gd-1_50.lib(error_code.obj) : error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol "__declspec(dllimport) void __cdecl std::_Xout_of_range(char const *)" (__imp_?_Xout_of_range@std@@YAXPBD@Z) referenced in function "public: void __thiscall std::basic_string<char,struct std::char_traits<char>,class std::allocator<char> >::_Xran(void)const " (?_Xran@?$basic_string@DU ?$char_traits@D@std@@V?$allocator@D@2@@std@@QBEXXZ) 1>D:\Cgal_Hello\Debug\Cgal_Hello.exe : fatal error LNK1120: 5 unresolved externals Can anyone please help me with this issues? desperately need help... In addition, if I have installed the installer, do I still have to use bjam.exe to build the libraries? Hope to hear from you soon. Thank you very much. -- Best Regards, Saw

2 1

[program_option] Better compiler checks?
by Klaim - Joël Lamotte 10 Sep '12

10 Sep '12

Hi I was adding program_option to my prorgam when I discovered a related leak. Fortunately it was false positive, but it pointed a hidden problem. I used: - Visual Studio 2012 - Boost 1.51.0 - Visual Leak Detector to detect the leak This, generate the leak: {{{ #include <boost/program_options.hpp> int main() { namespace bpo = boost::program_options; bpo::options_description options( "Options" ); options.add_options() ( "test" , "Test." ) , ( "value" , bpo::value<int>(), "Value." ) ; } }}} The second option is leaking. The reason is because of the comma in the beginning of the line. I first added it by reflex when using function arguments so it took me some time to find what was leaking. Part of the time I spend was figuring out why it don't leak if you don't set a value type: {{{ #include <boost/program_options.hpp> int main() { namespace bpo = boost::program_options; bpo::options_description options( "Options" ); options.add_options() ( "test" , "Test." ) , ( "value" , "Value." ) // no leak but still wrong! ; } }}} The main problem I see with this is that it is compiled without any problem nor warning. So here is my question: Would it be possible to forbid comma operator with options_description_easy_init? I added a ticket for this, #7361 : https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/7361 Joel Lamotte

1 0

Forward declaration headers
by Jens Auer 10 Sep '12

10 Sep '12

Hi, we often have to provide forward declarations of boost types by hand when we write interfaces. This is kind of dangerous because we will have to change the forward declarations when the boost libraries change and impossible for typedefs. Shouldn't there be a standard forward declaration headers in each of the boost libraries? Best regards, Jens

2 1

Sizes, signed and unsigned integers, MPL and Fusion
by Mathias Gaunard 10 Sep '12

10 Sep '12

Hi folks, I am writing this message to bring to your attention ticket #7304 <https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/7304> Sizes of fusion sequences are of type 'int', because it mimics MPL. However, sizes of standard containers, some of which are fusion sequences, are of type std::size_t, which is unsigned. This seems a bit inconsistent, and can lead to unexpected signed/unsigned mismatch warnings in certain scenarios. Should both MPL and Fusion be modified to use unsigned size types? I think it is best to discuss this with the whole of Boost.

2 1

Making use of extern template
by Jens Auer 10 Sep '12

10 Sep '12

Hi, I tried to use C++11 extern template mechanism to reduce the turn-around time for our main project, but it turns out that the way people write template code in libraries is not suited well for that purpose. I tried to explicitly instantiate the template base class of boost::posix_time_ptime, date_time::base_time<ptime, posix_time_system>, because ptime is a value class which is used quite often in our project. The base class is then instantiated in every translation unit and later removed by the linker (we use MS Visual C++ 2010. The linker is single threaded and dead slow). The problem with extern template and the boost library is that inline template code is still instantiated in every translation unit even when using extern template, so it basically has no effect with the current boost code: $14.7.2.10: "Except for inline functions and class template specializations, explicit instantiation declarations have the effect of suppressing the implicit instantiation of the entity to which they refer." I would like to have a discussion of how boost could support extern template to reduce built times, maybe by changing the coding style to not write template code inline and use extern template in the library to automatically suppress instantiation of library instantiations such as the base class of ptime. Best regards, Jens

1 0

[atomic, 1.52] adoption & merge request
by Tim Blechmann 09 Sep '12

09 Sep '12

hi all, boost.atomic has been accepted as boost library and has been in trunk for a few months. however there are some issues and pending patches and helge bahmann, the original author, did not comment on any of them. therefore, hartmut and me would like to adopt the library temporarily to support helge, and merge these pending patches. we also like to add the library into the release branch, so that it will make it into 1.52. any objections? thanks, tim

3 2

[atomic] ia32/cmpxchg8b fix
by Tim Blechmann 09 Sep '12

09 Sep '12

one of my users reported an issue with atomic on gcc/ia32, related to const-correctness. ok to commit this fix? thanks, tim Index: boost/atomic/detail/gcc-x86.hpp =================================================================== --- boost/atomic/detail/gcc-x86.hpp (revision 80433) +++ boost/atomic/detail/gcc-x86.hpp (working copy) @@ -1556,11 +1556,11 @@ template<typename T> T -platform_load64(volatile T * ptr) +platform_load64(const volatile T * ptr) { T expected = *ptr; do { - } while (!platform_cmpxchg64_strong(expected, expected, ptr)); + } while (!platform_cmpxchg64_strong(expected, expected, const_cast<volatile T*>(ptr))); return expected; }

2 1

Re: [boost] C++ Boost library - passing Shared pointer to a function
by abhishek goswami 09 Sep '12

09 Sep '12

I am looking for a project which is converting c malloc/realloc to shared_ptr. During my Analysis, I found the issue Can anyone provide me some input how to fix below issue typedef boost::shared_ptr<Employee_t> srdpointer; srdpointer ptr((Employee_t*)malloc(sizeof(Employee_t)),std::ptr_fun(free)); I need to pass the shared pointer which will allocate memory Pointed by the ptr. Something like this. void allocateBlocks(int **ptr, int *cnt) { *ptr = (int*)malloc(sizeof(int) * 10); *cnt = 10; /*do something*/ } int main() { int *p = NULL; int count = 0; allocateBlocks(&p, &count); /*do something*/ free(p); } How can I achieve the similar functionality using shared ptr as shown in above code

2 1

[intrusive] patch to resolve compiler error for WinCE
by David Deakins 09 Sep '12

09 Sep '12

Hi Ion, I had a little bit of time to look into the compile error mentioned in ticket 6841 and determine a patch from detail/mpl.hpp that I think should resolve it. The patch is attached to that Trac ticket, although I could also just go ahead and apply it if you like. Thanks, -Dave

2 1