- Boost - lists.boost.org

[make_shared]
by Yuriy Zubritsky 30 Jun '12

30 Jun '12

Regarding https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/6829 (make_shared is slower than shared_ptr(new) in MSVC) Does anyone want to apply it? It contains patch inside. Thanks

1 0

[BGL] How can I measure the memory used by a Boost graph ?
by ShNaYkHs ShNaYkHs 29 Jun '12

29 Jun '12

Hi, I have a graph defined as follow: struct NodeData{ /*...*/ }; struct EdgeData{ /*...*/ }; typedef adjacency_list<setS, setS, undirectedS, NodeData, EdgeData> MyGraph; MyGraph G; This graph is updated iteratively (by adding/deleting some edges/vertices). At each iteration, I want to evaluate the memory space occupied by this graph G. How can I do that ?

2 1

Tickets 6123 an 7023
by Luke Camden 29 Jun '12

29 Jun '12

Hi, Is anyone willing to commit these patches for me? If the process is not too involved I don't mind rtfm & DIY as an answer. Cheers, Luke

2 1

[1.50.0] Boost release 1.50.0 available
by Beman Dawes 29 Jun '12

29 Jun '12

Release 1.50.0 of the Boost C++ Libraries is now available. These open-source libraries work well with the C++ Standard Library, and are usable across a broad spectrum of applications. The Boost license encourages both commercial and non-commercial use. This release contains four new libraries (Algorithm, Functional/OverloadedFunction, LocalFunction and Utility/IdentityType) and numerous enhancements and bug fixes for existing libraries. For details, including download links, see http://www.boost.org/users/news/version_1_50_0 You can also download directly from SourceForge: http://sourceforge.net/projects/boost/files/boost/1.50.0/ To install this release on your system, see http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/release/more/getting_started/index.html Thanks, --The Boost release team Beman Dawes Daniel James Eric Niebler Marshall Clow Rene Rivera Vladimir Prus

3 4

Re: [boost] Policy proposal: All user-visible exceptions should be thrown through BOOST_THROW_EXCEPTION
by Brian Wood 29 Jun '12

29 Jun '12

Emil Dotchevski: >On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 7:46 AM, Brian Wood <woodbrian77(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> Emil Dotchevski: >> >> > >> > There are 3 aspects of boost::throw_exception: >> > >> > 1) it enables libraries to support BOOST_NO_EXCEPTIONS configurations, >> > 2) it enables boost::error_info, and >> > 3) it enables boost::exception_ptr. >> > >> > 1) and 2) have nothing to do with threads; 3) implements >> > std::exception_ptr, which mostly benefits multi-thread programs (until >> > compilers catch up with std::exception_ptr support.) >> > >> > The cost imposed by libraries that use boost::throw_exception to programs >> > that don't use boost::exception_ptr or boost::error_info is that sizeof() >> > the exception object grows a little. >> >> I'd appreciate a way at compile time to let Boost Exception know >> I'm using it in a single threaded application and it wouldn't add stuff >> to the exception object that isn't needed. Also MSDN says, >> "Most applications do not have to transport exceptions between threads." >> > > There are exception_ptr use cases for single threaded programs. I'm not asking for this to be the default even for single threaded programs. I'd like it to be something that a user could opt out of if they want to. (This is all based on the possibilty that Boost Exception could become required. If that doesn't happen, this request wouldn't be very pressing from my perspective.) I haven't found much on use cases in single threaded programs. Do you have any links? I did find the following comment in some code that uses exception_ptr. "The reason here is that construction/destruction of an exception_ptr are not "cheap"" Shalom, Brian Wood Ebenezer Enterprises http://webEbenezer.net

4 5

Exact Decimal library
by Andrew Robb 29 Jun '12

29 Jun '12

Introduction C++ needs UTF-8 text (Boost.Locale) and exact decimal types support. Together they allow full processing of modern business text. Normal existing binary exponent types (float, double and long double) are not suitable for exact decimal numbers. The IEEE 754-2008 decimal exponent types should be allowed in binary files. Most processors already use IEEE 754-1985 for binary exponent types. IBM processors already support IEEE 754-2008 decimal exponent types in hardware and can used for optimization for exact decimal. Other processors may use fixed-point exact decimal. Exact Decimal Exact decimal numbers indicate not only the value but also the precision. Thus 0.3 and 0.30 indicate the same value but with different precisions. With rounding, the value 0.3 indicates a value between 0.25 and 0.35 but the value 0.30 indicates a value between 0.295 and 0.305. These are different ranges albeit different around the same centres but must be considered different because of their precisions. Currency values are ‘exact’ as there is no legal or commercial meaning in between the smallest adjacent values defined precision. Even when the GBP went decimal with a halfpenny coin, most banks would only keep values to the penny. A lot of normal commercial exact decimal values can be held in 32-bit with fixed-point decimal to 2 places (USD, EUR and GBP currencies) up to about 20,000.00 - more than enough for weekly groceries. As such, they are as quick as 32-bit integers for addition and subtraction an nearly as fast for multiplying too. Exact decimal processing would not require IEEE 754-2008 decimal exponent types and could use decimal fixed-point indest. Indeed, the range of significand could be more than used by IEEE 754-2008 decimal exponent types (e.g. java.math.BigDecimal). Embedded processors can support fast exact decimal their own way (floating or fixed). http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n1169.pdf Extensions to support embedded processors must not give a general range decimal fixed-points. http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n1176.pdf Extension for the programming language C to support decimal floating-point arithmetic. Again, from IBM and not for decimal fixed-point type. http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2009/n2849.pdf Extension for the programming language C++ to support decimal floating-point arithmetic. Unfortunately the paper looks only at the IEEE 754-2008 hardware implementation rather than using decimal fixed-point implementation. The proposed solution might be enough for high-end database servers but not would helpful for x86 and ARM type embedded processors, where power savings for would be allowed by turning off the binary exponential processor as well as improved accuracy. For existing binary exponent types (float, double and long double), I think there should be new format string type (e.g “-123U-12”). This has a signed integer significand and a signed integer binary exponent. The significand cannot have decimals (no decimal point). Those IEEE 754 formats can indicate “Inf” and “NaN” as well (numeric_limits::is_iec559). There is no conversion error from binary exponent to decimal as is suffered currently. The new decimal types use a opaque arrangement. This allows each platform to use its own hardware to best effect. Each value is defined as a fixed number of decimal points. The significand grows or shrinks opaquely to take any value and can change how it works for each type. The fixed number of decimal points can be over the thousands before or after the decimal point. Thus the range of the decimal fixed points will be the same or more than those for decimal exponent types (-6143..6144). The significand has a least maximum 34 digits, again to match for decimal exponent - probably at least 38.23 for 128-bit significand. The method of keeping the significand can change with size and processor. For instance, 32-bit binary is fast on 32-bit processors (or 64-bit native binary). 30-bit (9 digit) or 10-bit (3 digit) decimal can grow (BigDecimal) for thousands of digits. IEEE 754 2008 decimal exponent types for IBM processors (also 10-bit groups of 3 digits) but slow without hardware support. Much of the work of exact decimal are similar to the SQL-92 types for NUMERIC (variable decimal places) and DECIMAL (fixed-point decimal) differ by variable or fixed decimal point. The NUMERIC type is similar to decimal exponent. The DECIMAL fixed-point decimal can be set by template or constructor. Only run-time decimal places available for NUMERIC. We don’t limit the number of decimal places but the SQL-92 types limit decimal places to 0 and number of digits (MySQL 5.0.3 supports 65 digits for NUMERIC and DECIMAL and DB2 supports 31 digits.) Accumulators There should be _Accum that can opaquely contain several decimal fixed-point accumulators of all different sizes (with the same fixed number of decimal points). Thus small efficient accumulators are used with small values. Whereas a _Decimal has a union defining the value, a _Accum might have a structure with similar members. If a overflow comes, its old accumulator value is added the to a slower bigger accumulator and reset the small accumulator. The small accumulator receives small values again. When the values are accumulated, the small accumulators are combined into the largest used accumulator for the final answer. Such a complicated behaviors arrangement needs compilation rather than C++ coding. For instance, using the overflow flag uses information from to the compiler. Operations We are only interested in (commercial) safe exact decimal operations for the following types: _Numeric: decimal exponent _Decimal: decimal fixed-point _Accum: several sized decimal fixed-point accumulators Multiply The exact decimal can be multiplied by other exact decimals and integers. The resulting decimal places are the sum of the right hand side. lhs = one * two; lhs *= integer; // or 0 decimal place Divide We can only divide by integers (or exact decimal with 0 place). The results have the same number of decimals. A divisor of zero will be thrown (no infinity). lhs = rhs / integer; lhs /= integer; Modulo There will be a remainder from a divide. Again with the same number decimals. lhs = rhs % integer; lhs %= integer; Add and Subtract We can add/subtract with other exact decimals with the same number of decimal places. Mixing values with different decimal places may cause problems for exact values (different truncation for instance). lhs = rhs + val; lhs = rhs - val; lhs += val; lhs -= val; Where values with different decimal places need combining explicitly we use trunc() to match the decimal places first. This can increase as well as decrease decimal places. It also allows tracks of errors. Comparison <, <=, ==, !=, >= and > between exact decimals with the same number of decimal places. Collections Any _Decimal collection can be limited to values with the same decimal fixed-point places. Truncation The binary exponent values float, double and long double have separate approximate values 1.3f, 1.3 or 1.3L for different sizes. I propose another exact decimal value, for example 1.300d for three decimal places. Alternatively use exact decimal exponent 1300e-3d version (using integer significand). Value Approximation 1.3f - 1.2999999523162841796875.. 1.3 - 1.3000000000000000444089209850062616169452.. 1.3L - 1.3000000000000000000000000000000000385185.. 1.300d or 1300e-3d - 1.300 (exact) Where a value is not the precision, we must expand or truncate to required decimals places and should choose a method of truncation (matched to IEEE 754-2008): ceil - the most negative answer not less than the original floor - the most positive answer not greater than the original zero - the answer furthest from zero not further than the original (the usual C method) round - the answer nearest the original choosing the most positive in case of a tie bank# - like round but choosing the even last digit in case of a tie expand - not truncation (zero padding) and the error should be zero As well as tructaton is then required value, there were be a leftover (similar in % value with a /). By keeping a record of truncation we can assess of errors. template <typename T> _Decimal & _Decimal::trunc(TRUNC, T const &source, T *error = 0); This will be a preferred way to convert binary exponent types into a decimal value for printing. Formatting For place 0 decimal format like integer and between places 1 and 9, the format will be decimal and trailing zeros are significant. Otherwise with the default format will be a exponent (matched to the decimal) with a integer significand. They will resemble binary float types, except that they are accurate and avoid decimals in the significand. 123 (0 decimal place so no decimal point) -0.012340 (6 decimal places) -12340e-12 (12 decimal places or decimal exponent -12) Final number formatting will be up to Boost.Locale using Unicode.

2 1

Range notation grammar
by Dave Abrahams 29 Jun '12

29 Jun '12

This ship has undoubtedly sailed, but I'd like to register my displeasure with names like "uniqued," "taken," and "strided" et. al. The effect (subjectively of course) is to take a beautiful, minimal abstract notation that reflects a common practice (seriously, it's "grep," which is a verb, not "grepped") and mess it up with unconventional and awkward linguistic insurance against misunderstanding. this-has-been-a-test-of-the-emergency-nattering-system-ly y'rs, -- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com

3 3

date_time bug.
by GAURAV GUPTA 29 Jun '12

29 Jun '12

Hi All, I have reported one bug: Ticket No:7022. (Link is https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/7022 ) As I have tracked. the owner (you can see it on ticket information) assigned to my ticket is not active. I have not found any posts by him newer that year 2007. So, could anyone help in verifying my patch for the reported bug?. I found this bug using some tool. Please reffer the ticket No. 7022 -- Regards, Gaurav

2 4

[review] status of Boost.Conversion?
by Nathan Ridge 29 Jun '12

29 Jun '12

Hi, I am wondering, what is the status of the Boost.Conversion library? On the Review Schedule page, it indicates that a review had taken place in August 2011 and the results of the review are "pending". Does anyone when the results will be forthcoming? Thanks, Nate

4 7

JNI library
by Felipe Magno de Almeida 28 Jun '12

28 Jun '12

Hello Boosters, I'm developing a JNI library for writing native code in C++ for Java and calling Java code within C++, using JNI as interface to the JVM. Is there any interest in this library? Regards, -- Felipe Magno de Almeida

3 10