On 04/02/2026 13:56, Ruben Perez via Boost wrote:
As a community, do we want to somehow do some (positive) self-criticism to see what went wrong here? IMHO that would be the best course of action to try to avoid further damage like this in the future.
I'm a relatively fresh member of this list and still mainly inactive. I read (yes, really) the Discussion Policy before joining and liked what I read. All the more sad that it seems that even the boost community does not always achieve a purely factual and friendly discussion (though I do see this objectivity in the vast majority of contributions!). Maybe it could be a good first step, if everyone re-read said document on this occasion? https://www.boost.org/doc/user-guide/discussion-policy.html Cheers, Kai -- "[The internet] doesn't work in couch-potato mode." [Philip Elmer-DeWitt in TIME] D-55120 Meenz fon :+49 6131 6063865 fast: kaibar (aT] posteo(dot)net ++ PGP Key fingerprint 1E92 F0AA 25DA 028A 229A 645E 00F2 596A 9662 CEB2 ++ -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- VERSION: 3.12 GCS/IT d- s: a++>-----(?) C++$ UL++(++++) P++ L++$ E-(+) W--(+) N !w--- !O !M V? PS+ PE-() Y+ PGP++ t R@* tv--(-) b+>++ DI++ G e+++(*) h? y? ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------