24 Apr
2013
24 Apr
'13
6:47 p.m.
Le 24/04/13 18:02, Gottlob Frege a écrit :
One thing I missed in this conversation:
Are we considering the Alexandrescu behaviour of throwing in the destructor if the expected<> has not been read? Why would you want to that?
I was imagining just an excepted<likely_type, error_type> class. I forgot about the novel throwing behaviour.
This will correspond to expected_or_error. Best, Vicente