For my team that bundles a version of Boost with VxWorks RTOS this would be great. We are not C++ experts, so when we offically adopt a newer C++ standard in our bundlled STL, figuring out if new regression errors in Boost are “our” fault is very time consuming.
On Nov 18, 2025, at 3:46 PM, Vinnie Falco via Boost <boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
On Tue, Nov 18, 2025 at 11:27 AM Jakob Lövhall <lovhall@protonmail.com> wrote:
some boost libraries are obsolete, some boost libraries are abandoned, some boost libraries are both active and relevant. I do not use Boost.Move nor Boost.Assign. Boost.Move indeed seems obsolete.
Exactly. I don't think I've seen you around before, Jakob - welcome!
Giving users a way to express "I'm using C++17 and later" is helpful in other ways. It gives us a direct measurement of the importance of each of the C++ language versions. And we'd like to give users more ways of helping us figure out what they find important, such as putting a star to "favorite" a library, or a survey they can fill out to tell us which Boost libraries they use most.
Thanks _______________________________________________ Boost mailing list -- boost@lists.boost.org To unsubscribe send an email to boost-leave@lists.boost.org https://lists.boost.org/mailman3/lists/boost.lists.boost.org/ Archived at: https://lists.boost.org/archives/list/boost@lists.boost.org/message/CRGK2KI7...