Re: [boost] Why no non-null smart pointers?

29 Apr 2014


      So I deleted the wrong post. This is the version of the proposed change that
I intended to keep.

template < typename T>
void shared_ptr < T > :: reset ( T * p = 0 )
{
    if ( p ) {
          /* what happens in shared_ptr now */
    }
    else {
        /* new behavior in shared_ptr, when it detects a nill raw pointer */
        *this = NullObjectTypes < T > :: factory ();
    }
}


--
View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/Why-no-non-null-smart-pointers-tp2642959p...
Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [boost] Why no non-null smart pointers?

Jeff Hill