"Thorsten Ottosen" <nesotto@cs.auc.dk> writes:
"JOAQUIN LOPEZ MU?Z" <joaquin@tid.es> wrote in message news:32ded832c0cd.32c0cd32ded8@tid.es...
Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
I think tr components should be allowed special status. What's the point in putting tr components through a normal review, when there can be no interface changes?
| As for my negative vote to accepting Boost.Unordered for | fasttrack, my main concern is that other authors are patiently | standing in line for their own reviews, and the size and scope | of this library does not justify for a fasttrack treatment, in | my humble opinion. Other than that I think the lib is needed | and will eventually make it into Boost.
IMO any TR compliant component should be allowed into boost without any major review. It's already been through a major year-long review in the standard committee.
As far as I'm concerned, the test suite for a TR component is the most important part of any submission that implements it. The test suite deserves careful scrutiny. Maybe not two weeks of scrutiny, but probably a week. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com