Re: [boost] program_options lib patch

From: "Vladimir Prus" <ghost@cs.msu.su> 2. What compilers did you test your modification with? I recall that std::tolower vs. tolower thing was hard to get working everywhere, so I'd rather no touch it unless it's broken somewhere.

This is how I deal with it: void function_using_tolower() { using namespace std; // use unqualified tolower } I haven't found a better way to tackle the issue (when using the <cxx> headers). In .cpp files, <xx.h> is an option.