15 Sep
2006
15 Sep
'06
4:28 a.m.
"Manfred Doudar" wrote
Please see my brief reply to Geoffrey Irving; ... and apologies for any apprehension caused, but its my fault - the best name to use really depends on context.
Then I guess in fusion you would do : fusion::inner_product<SequenceA, SequenceB,Function1,Function2>{...} fusion::dot_product<SequenceA, SequenceB> : fusion::inner_product< SequenceA,SequenceB, boost:functional::multiplies,boost::functional::plus
{};
regards Andy Little