12 Oct
2017
12 Oct
'17
9:43 p.m.
On 12/10/2017 19:17, Ion Gaztañaga via Boost wrote:
On 12/10/2017 10:37, Thorsten Ottosen via Boost wrote:
That means your design where capacity is the the full buffer length can satisfy both situations. So I agree with you. But it also calls into question the need for anything else than capacity (i.e., there seem to be vanishingly little use for back_capacity/front_capacity and they probably confuse more than they help).
I agree. If capacity is the full buffer length, only back/front_capacity make sense.
I wanted to say only back/front_FREE-capacity makes sense if capacity is the full buffer length. Ion