18 Mar
2006
18 Mar
'06
2:50 a.m.
Howard Hinnant wrote:
Sorry for the delay in the follow up.
On Mar 16, 2006, at 7:03 PM, Peter Dimov wrote:
Can you try the +m change on as many g++ versions as possible? I may be misremembering things. Or can you try the potentially safer alternative of adding "m"( *pw ) as an input and see whether this also works?
Yes, that seems to work just fine too.
Added to CVS, and thanks.