Any reason GitLab is not being considered? I think that is also a community
maintained platform?
On Mon, 11 May 2026, 7:50 am Klemens Morgenstern via Boost, <
boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
> On Mon, May 11, 2026 at 9:53 AM Vinnie Falco via Boost <
> boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, May 10, 2026 at 9:07 PM Marshall Clow via Boost <
> > boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
> >
> > > On May 10, 2026, at 5:02 PM, Peter Taraba via Boost <
> > boost@lists.boost.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > Then they showed that they could no longer run it well
> >
> >
> > I've used Gitea a few years ago and it looks like Codeberg's Forgejo is a
> clone.
> Back then Drone CI worked great with Gitea.
> It seems that drone has been forked into Woodpeckers CI as well, which
> Forgejo is using by default.
>
> Thus, the existing drone scripts should largely work.
>
> So either Gitea + Drone or Forgejo + Woodpeckers sound great to me.
>
>
> > Yep. So, there is no urgency, and we should start thinking about what a
> > migration plan might look like. How do we extract the open issues and
> > transfer them? What do we do with the CI system? Release packages? Open
> > pull requests?
> >
>
> I think the first attempt should be to spin up a mirror of either Forgejo
> and/or Gitea
> and see how it works.
> And then we set a date, at which we disable issues and PRs on Github
> and use github as a pure (and automated) mirror.
>
>
> > If for example we want to transfer the open issues then we should start
> > collecting them now, because of rate limits (it could take weeks or
> months
> > to collect all the data which is not stored in the repo).
> >
>
> Both have an "import from github" function, that allows you to import a
> full project.
> This is probably a good default, unless a maintainer wants to do it another
> way (e.g. only transfer certains issues).
>
>
>
>
> > We also might think about the libraries which are not actively maintained
> > (if any?) we could reach out to authors and make sure everyone is aware
> and
> > involved in planning a migration.
> >
> > If we prepare now, we can be ready ahead of time, instead of having the
> > issue forced on us when things become untenable at GitHub.
> >
> > Thanks
> > _______________________________________________
> > Boost mailing list -- boost@lists.boost.org
> > To unsubscribe send an email to boost-leave@lists.boost.org
> >
https://lists.boost.org/mailman3/lists/boost.lists.boost.org/
> > Archived at:
> >
>
https://lists.boost.org/archives/list/boost@lists.boost.org/message/3SYG4QWSU6MV5U7WYQDJMPMIXFPZG5VD/
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Boost mailing list -- boost@lists.boost.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to boost-leave@lists.boost.org
>
https://lists.boost.org/mailman3/lists/boost.lists.boost.org/
> Archived at:
>
https://lists.boost.org/archives/list/boost@lists.boost.org/message/JQFOILZOCBSZBSFDAPKC5MXU6OJYKHBT/
>
_______________________________________________
Boost mailing list -- boost@lists.boost.org
To unsubscribe send an email to boost-leave@lists.boost.org
https://lists.boost.org/mailman3/lists/boost.lists.boost.org/
Archived at:
https://lists.boost.org/archives/list/boost@lists.boost.org/message/JSBFACOV7724MUCLGDUG5XQWKBBE3NOP/