Re: [boost] wgcc 2.0 RC1 released

"Duft Markus" <Markus.Duft@salomon.at> writes:

Hi again!

For all interested in native Windows binaries built with Autotools and mnay other interesting things:

I'm not sure whether this is on-topic for Boost; it seems of somewhat borderline relevance. However, now that you've started the thread, one obvious question leaps to mind: why would anyone want to use wgcc in lieu of Cygwin or MinGW gcc? -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com