20 Nov
2006
20 Nov
'06
10:52 a.m.
Douglas Gregor wrote:
IIRC, at one point we were supporting a platform that had <iostream> but not <istream> or <ostream>, so I got in the habit of using <iostream> despite its cost. That platform might not matter any more, and I'd support fixing Boost's headers to avoid including iostream.... just not for 1.34.0 :)
gcc 2.95 Regards, m Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com