Rene Rivera <grafik.list@redshift-software.com> writes:
David Abrahams wrote:
"Jonathan Turkanis" <technews@kangaroologic.com> writes:
2. #10 - simple recognizable, easily scalable (including icon), brings a connotation of ++. Though I would definitely change a colors. May be some extra text are in order
I think I rejected that one without looking very closely. I think black is a bad choice; it looks better with a deep blue (see attached) The symbol looks like it's trying to be two plus signs with pointy ends, mapped onto a sphere. But the sphere mapping isn't quite done right. If we could fix that, I think this could be a real candidate.
I'll see what I can do :-)
Great. I have to say, I probably didn't consider it enough. I think maybe 67 was most appealing because its execution was top-notch. There are few other logos in the contest that were as polished. This just goes to show that a good idea with sub-par execution will probably make a negative impression on at least some people. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com