4 Jan
2021
4 Jan
'21
9:50 a.m.
On 30. Dec 2020, at 13:20, Paul A Bristow via Boost <boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
Boost.Math has a documented minimum requirement of C++11 (but many library functions, distributions etc still work with C++03, and some new library items require C++17, and some are likely to require C++20 very soon).
I'm sorry that this doesn't fit neatly into your schema ☹
Paul
I am curious, which parts of Boost.Math have a minimum requirement of C++17 or later? I could not tell from a quick glance at the github page or the docs... Can a math library consisting mostly of functions and algorithms not be written in a way to have a minimum requirement of C++11 and optionally support later standards? Best regards, Hans