6 Mar
2026
6 Mar
'26
8:22 p.m.
Review managers never ask for this part, but I think it is equally important. How likely is it that the library will be well maintained after the adoption?
That is a good question, but I'm not sure where in the process that should go. Perhaps this is something potential review managers should consider before agreeing to manage the review of the library?
I recommend that the library be CONDITIONALLY ACCEPTED into Boost. The condition being improving the reference section of the documentation.
Thank you for your review; your acceptance condition is noted. I am not going to open a separate issue on the repo for this since it looks like it is already being handled in #130. Matt