10 May
2005
10 May
'05
6:19 p.m.
From: "Pavel Vozenilek" <pavel_vozenilek@hotmail.com>
"Dan Rosen" wrote:
1. Creator policy is redundant with the standard Allocator concept, I think. Though the standard Allocator concept has some subtle, tricky semantics, I think it's nevertheless worth using: that would permit interoperability with existing allocator implementations.
Thinking it again: you are likely right here.
Handling of constructor arguments could be separated from allocation.
I don't know about that, but perhaps an adapter could be provided to make a standard allocator look like a creator? -- Rob Stewart stewart@sig.com Software Engineer http://www.sig.com Susquehanna International Group, LLP using std::disclaimer;